Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Competency-Based Frameworks in Medical School Education Programs: A Thematic Analysis of the Academic Medicine Snapshots, 2020.
Ryan, Michael S; Blood, Angela D; Park, Yoon Soo; Farnan, Jeanne M.
Afiliación
  • Ryan MS; M.S. Ryan is professor and vice chair of education, Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, and a PhD student, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID: 0000-0003-3266-9289 .
  • Blood AD; A.D. Blood is director of curricular resources, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC; ORCID: 0000-0003-2275-923X .
  • Park YS; Y.S. Park is associate professor, Harvard Medical School, and director, health professions education research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ORCID: 0000-0001-8583-4335 .
  • Farnan JM; J.M. Farnan is professor of medicine and associate dean for medical school education, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; ORCID: 0000-0002-1138-9416 .
Acad Med ; 97(11S): S63-S70, 2022 11 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35947463
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Educational program objectives (EPOs) provide the foundation for a medical school's curriculum. In recent years, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) endorsed an outcomes-based approach to objectives, to embrace the movement toward competency-based medical education (CBME). The purpose of this study was to explore the CBME frameworks used by medical schools in formulating their EPOs. A secondary aim was to determine factors related to the selection of specific frameworks.

METHOD:

The authors performed a quantitative content analysis of entries to the 2020 Academic Medicine Snapshot. Publicly available data gathered included demographic features of each program (e.g., year founded, accreditation status, affiliation, etc.), participation in national medical education consortia, and presence of specific CBME frameworks identified in EPOs. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends in frameworks used by medical schools. Bivariate comparisons between factors and frameworks were conducted using chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to examine factors predicting use of more recently developed CBME frameworks.

RESULTS:

A total of 135 institutions submitted Snapshots (RR = 88%). All institutions endorsed 1 or more CBME frameworks, with 37% endorsing 2 and 20% endorsing 3 or more. The most common was the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies (63%). In addition to published frameworks, 36% of institutions developed their own competencies. Schools with pending LCME visits were 2.61 times more likely to use a more recently developed curricular framework, P = .022.

CONCLUSIONS:

Medical schools in the United States have embraced the CBME movement through incorporation of competency-based frameworks in their EPOs. While it is encouraging that CBME frameworks have been integrated in medical school EPOs, the variability and use of multiple frameworks identifies the pressing need for a unified CBME framework in undergraduate medical education.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación Médica / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación Médica / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article