Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metagenomic analysis of endemic viruses in oral secretions from Chinese pigs.
Umar, Sajid; Anderson, Benjamin D; Chen, Kuanfu; Wang, Guo-Lin; Ma, Mai-Juan; Gray, Gregory C.
Afiliación
  • Umar S; Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
  • Anderson BD; Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
  • Chen K; Division of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
  • Wang GL; Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
  • Ma MJ; State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China.
  • Gray GC; State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China.
Vet Med Sci ; 8(5): 1982-1992, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36047475
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pigs are unique reservoirs for virus ecology. Despite the increased use of improved biosecurity measures, pig viruses readily circulate in Chinese swine farms.

OBJECTIVES:

The main objective of this study was to examine archived swine oral secretion samples with a panel of pan-species viral assays such that we might better describe the viral ecology of swine endemic viruses in Chinese farms.

METHODOLOGY:

Two hundred (n = 200) swine oral secretion samples, collected during 2015 and 2016 from healthy pigs on six swine farms in two provinces in China, were screened with molecular pan-species assays for coronaviruses (CoVs), adenoviruses (AdVs), enteroviruses (EVs), and paramyxoviruses (PMV). Samples were also screened for porcine circovirus (PCV) 3, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and influenza A virus (IAV).

RESULTS:

Among 200 swine oral secretion samples, 152 (76.0%) were found to have at least one viral detection. Thirty-four samples (17%) were positive for more than one virus, including 24 (70.5%) with dual detection and 10 (29.5%) with triple detection. Seventy-eight (39.0%) samples were positive for porcine AdVs, 22 (11.0%) were positive for porcine CoVs, 21 (10.5%) were positive for IAVs, 13 (6.5%) were positive for PCV, 7 (3.5%) were positive for PMV, six (3.0%) were positive for PRRSV and five (2.5%) were positive for porcine EV.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings underscore the high prevalence of numerous viruses among production pigs in China and highlight the need for routine, periodic surveillance for novel virus emergence with the goal of protecting pigs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Virus de la Influenza A / Enfermedades de los Porcinos / Circovirus / Virus del Síndrome Respiratorio y Reproductivo Porcino / Síndrome Respiratorio y de la Reproducción Porcina Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Med Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Virus de la Influenza A / Enfermedades de los Porcinos / Circovirus / Virus del Síndrome Respiratorio y Reproductivo Porcino / Síndrome Respiratorio y de la Reproducción Porcina Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Med Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China