Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence.
Elawad, Terteel; Scott, Georgia; Bone, Jeffrey N; Elwell, Helen; Lopez, Cristina Escalona; Filippi, Veronique; Green, Marcus; Khalil, Asma; Kinshella, Mai-Lei W; Mistry, Hiten D; Pickerill, Kelly; Shanmugam, Reshma; Singer, Joel; Townsend, Rosemarie; Tsigas, Eleni Z; Vidler, Marianne; Volvert, Marie-Laure; von Dadelszen, Peter; Magee, Laura A.
Afiliación
  • Elawad T; Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Scott G; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Bone JN; Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Elwell H; North West London Foundation School, London, UK.
  • Lopez CE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Filippi V; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Green M; British Medical Association (BMA) Library, BMA, London, UK.
  • Khalil A; Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Kinshella MW; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Mistry HD; Action on Pre-Eclampsia (APEC), Evesham, UK.
  • Pickerill K; St George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Shanmugam R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Singer J; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Townsend R; Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Tsigas EZ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Vidler M; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Volvert ML; Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • von Dadelszen P; West Midlands Central Foundation School, Birmingham, UK.
  • Magee LA; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
BJOG ; 131(1): 46-62, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36209504
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare pre-eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre-eclampsia prevention.

DESIGN:

Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre-eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021.

SETTING:

Published studies and CPGs. POPULATION Pregnant women.

METHODS:

We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Pre-eclampsia.

RESULTS:

Of 78 pre-eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually 'probable' (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The 'major' and 'moderate' risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten 'major' risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre-eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity ('moderate' risk factor) was definitely associated with pre-eclampsia (high-quality evidence). The other ten 'moderate' risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre-eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality) being overweight; 'prehypertension' at booking; and blood pressure of 130-139/80-89 mmHg in early pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pre-eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preeclampsia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Preeclampsia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido