Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19.
Ma, Ting Martin; Parikh, Neil R; Philipson, Rebecca G; van Dams, Ritchell; Chang, Eric M; Hegde, John V; Kishan, Amar U; Kaprealian, Tania B; Steinberg, Michael L; Raldow, Ann C.
Afiliación
  • Ma TM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Parikh NR; San Antonio Cancer Center, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Philipson RG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, California.
  • van Dams R; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Chang EM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Hegde JV; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kishan AU; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kaprealian TB; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Steinberg ML; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Raldow AC; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 8(1): 100924, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36532603
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists.

Results:

One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on-treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients' inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow-up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.

Conclusions:

Telemedicine will likely remain part of the radiation oncology workflow in most clinics after the pandemic. It should be used in conjunction with in-person visits, and may be best used for conducting follow-up visits in certain disease sites such as genitourinary and thoracic malignancies.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Adv Radiat Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Adv Radiat Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article