Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance and safety of motorized spiral enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Papaefthymiou, Apostolis; Ramai, Daryl; Maida, Marcello; Tziatzios, Georgios; Viesca, Michael Fernandez Y; Papanikolaou, Ioannis; Paraskeva, Konstantina; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos; Repici, Alessandro; Hassan, Cesare; Binda, Cecilia; Beyna, Torsten; Facciorusso, Antonio; Arvanitakis, Marianna; Gkolfakis, Paraskevas.
Afiliación
  • Papaefthymiou A; Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London, UK; First Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.
  • Ramai D; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Maida M; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy.
  • Tziatzios G; Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision," Athens, Greece.
  • Viesca MFY; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Papanikolaou I; Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Paraskeva K; Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision," Athens, Greece.
  • Triantafyllou K; Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Repici A; Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Hassan C; Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Binda C; Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy.
  • Beyna T; Department of Internal Medicine, Evagelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Facciorusso A; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • Arvanitakis M; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Gkolfakis P; Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision," Athens, Greece; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 97(5): 849-858.e5, 2023 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36738795
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

The introduction of motorized spiral enteroscopy (mSE) into clinical practice holds diagnostic and therapeutic potential for small-bowel investigations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the performance of this modality in diagnosing and treating small-bowel lesions.

METHODS:

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were performed through September 2022. The primary outcome was diagnostic success, defined as the identification of a lesion relative to the indication. Secondary outcomes were successful therapeutic manipulation, total enteroscopy rate (examination from the duodenojejunal flexion to the cecum), technical success (passage from the ligament of Treitz or ileocecal valve for anterograde and retrograde approach, respectively), and adverse event rates. We performed meta-analyses using a random-effects model, and the results are reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS:

From 2016 to 2022, 9 studies (959 patients; 42% women; mean age >45 years; 474 patients [49.4%] investigated for mid-GI bleeding/anemia) were considered eligible and included in analysis. The diagnostic success rate of mSE was 78% (95% CI, 72-84; I2 = 78.3%). Considering secondary outcomes, total enteroscopy was attempted in 460 cases and completed with a rate of 51% (95% CI, 30-72; I2 = 96.2%), whereas therapeutic interventions were successful in 98% of cases (95% CI, 96-100; I2 = 79.8%) where attempted. Technical success rates were 96% (95% CI, 94-97; I2 = 1.5%) for anterograde and 97% (95% CI, 94-100; I2 = 38.6%) for retrograde approaches, respectively. Finally, the incidence of adverse events was 17% (95% CI, 13-21; I2 = 65.1%), albeit most were minor adverse events (16%; 95% CI, 11-20; I2 = 67.2%) versus major adverse events (1%; 95% CI, 0-1; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS:

mSE provides high rates of diagnostic and therapeutic success with a low prevalence of severe adverse events.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Endoscopía Gastrointestinal / Intestino Delgado Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Endoscopía Gastrointestinal / Intestino Delgado Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia