Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Competency profiles for evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM): a rapid review.
Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia; Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques; Setti, Cecilia; Machado, Maria Lúcia Teixeira; Riera, Rachel; Gomes, Romeu; da Silva, Silvio Fernandes.
Afiliación
  • Barreto JOM; Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil. jorgeomaia@hotmail.com.
  • Romão DMM; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, Brazil. jorgeomaia@hotmail.com.
  • Setti C; Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Machado MLT; Instituto Veredas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Riera R; Instituto Veredas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gomes R; Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • da Silva SF; Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Paulo, Brazil.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 21(1): 16, 2023 Feb 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36755283
BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational capacities, linked with background factors and needs. The identification of essential knowledge, skills and attitudes for EIPM can support the development of competency profiles and their application in different contexts. PURPOSE: To identify elements of competency (knowledge, skills and attitudes) for EIPM, according to different professional profiles (researcher, health professional, decision-maker and citizen). METHODS: Rapid umbrella review. A structured search was conducted and later updated in two comprehensive repositories (BVSalud and PubMed). Review studies with distinctive designs were included, published from 2010 onwards, without language restrictions. Assessment of the methodological quality of the studies was not performed. A meta-aggregative narrative synthesis was used to report the findings. RESULTS: Ten reviews were included. A total of 37 elements of competency were identified, eight were categorized as knowledge, 19 as skills and 10 as attitudes. These elements were aggregated into four competency profiles: researcher, health professional, decision-maker and citizen. The competency profiles included different sets of EIPM-related knowledge, skills and attitudes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study is innovative because it aggregates different profiles of competency from a practical perspective, favouring the application of its results in different contexts to support EIPM. Methodological limitations are related to the shortcuts adopted in this review: complementary searches of the grey literature were not performed, and the study selection and data extraction were not conducted in duplicate. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: EIPM requires the development of individual and organizational capacities. This rapid review contributes to the discussion on the institutionalization of EIPM in health systems. The competency profiles presented here can support discussions about the availability of capacity and the need for its development in different contexts.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Formulación de Políticas / Actitud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Formulación de Políticas / Actitud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil