Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validating cuffless continuous blood pressure monitoring devices.
Hu, Jiun-Ruey; Martin, Gabrielle; Iyengar, Sanjna; Kovell, Lara C; Plante, Timothy B; Helmond, Noud van; Dart, Richard A; Brady, Tammy M; Turkson-Ocran, Ruth-Alma N; Juraschek, Stephen P.
Afiliación
  • Hu JR; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Martin G; University of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Iyengar S; University of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Kovell LC; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Plante TB; Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
  • Helmond NV; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Dart RA; Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Brady TM; Center for Precision Medicine, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
  • Turkson-Ocran RN; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Juraschek SP; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Lahey Clinic/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cardiovasc Digit Health J ; 4(1): 9-20, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36865583
ABSTRACT
Cuff-based home blood pressure (BP) devices, which have been the standard for BP monitoring for decades, are limited by physical discomfort, convenience, and their ability to capture BP variability and patterns between intermittent readings. In recent years, cuffless BP devices, which do not require cuff inflation around a limb, have entered the market, offering the promise of continuous beat-to-beat measurement of BP. These devices take advantage of a variety of principles to determine BP, including (1) pulse arrival time, (2) pulse transit time, (3) pulse wave analysis, (4) volume clamping, and (5) applanation tonometry. Because BP is calculated indirectly, these devices require calibration with cuff-based devices at regular intervals. Unfortunately, the pace of regulation of these devices has failed to match the speed of innovation and direct availability to patient consumers. There is an urgent need to develop a consensus on standards by which cuffless BP devices can be tested for accuracy. In this narrative review, we describe the landscape of cuffless BP devices, summarize the current status of validation protocols, and provide recommendations for an ideal validation process for these devices.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Digit Health J Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Digit Health J Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article