Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The COVID Psychosocial Impacts Scale: A Reliable and Valid Tool to Examine the Psychosocial Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Tanveer, Sandila; Schluter, Philip J; Beaglehole, Ben; Porter, Richard J; Boden, Joseph; Sulaiman-Hill, Ruqayya; Scarf, Damian; Dean, Shaystah; Assad, Fatima; Hasnat, Mahammad Abul; Bell, Caroline.
Afiliación
  • Tanveer S; Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
  • Schluter PJ; Te Kaupeka Oranga|Faculty of Health, Te Whare Wananga o Waitaha|University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand.
  • Beaglehole B; School of Clinical Medicine, Primary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • Porter RJ; Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
  • Boden J; Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
  • Sulaiman-Hill R; Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
  • Scarf D; Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
  • Dean S; Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
  • Assad F; Department of Psychological Medicine, Wellington Campus, University of Otago, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.
  • Hasnat MA; Department of Psychiatry, HITEC Institute of Medical Sciences, Taxila 47078, Pakistan.
  • Bell C; Department of Education, Milestone College, Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37297593
This paper reports on the development and validation of the COVID Psychosocial Impacts Scale (CPIS), a self-report measure that comprehensively examines both positive and negative psychosocial impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the first part of the program of work in which the CPIS was administered and compared with a measure of psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K-10) and wellbeing (World Health Organization Well-Being Index, WHO-5). The data were obtained online in 2020 and 2022 at two distinct time points to capture different exposures to the pandemic in the New Zealand population to a non-representative sample of 663 and 687 adults, respectively. Two hundred seventy-one participants took part in both surveys. Findings indicate a unidimensional structure within CPIS subscales and inter-relatedness among CPIS stress-related subscales. The scatter plots and correlation matrix indicate CPIS having a positive moderate correlation with K10 and a negative moderate correlation with WHO-5, indicative of construct validity. The paper outlines contextual factors surrounding CPIS development and makes suggestions for future iterations of CPIS. Further work will examine its psychometric properties across cultures.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda