Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of baseline hemodynamics after the Fontan procedure: a retrospective cohort study on the comparison of 4D Flow MRI and computational fluid dynamics.
Lee, Gyu-Han; Koo, Hyun Jung; Park, Kyung Jin; Yang, Dong Hyun; Ha, Hojin.
Afiliación
  • Lee GH; Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Biohealth-Machinery Convergence Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Koo HJ; Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KJ; Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yang DH; Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ha H; Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Physiol ; 14: 1199771, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37304827
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to characterize the hemodynamics of Fontan patients using both four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow MRI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

Methods:

Twenty-nine patients (3.5 ± 0.5 years) who had undergone the Fontan procedure were enrolled, and the superior vena cava (SVC), left pulmonary artery (LPA), right pulmonary artery (RPA), and conduit were segmented based on 4D Flow MRI images. Velocity fields from 4D Flow MRI were used as boundary conditions for CFD simulations. Hemodynamic parameters such as peak velocity (Vmax), pulmonary flow distribution (PFD), kinetic energy (KE), and viscous dissipation (VD) were estimated and compared between the two modalities. Results and

discussion:

The Vmax, KE, VD, PFDTotal to LPA, and PFDTotal to RPA of the Fontan circulation were 0.61 ± 0.18 m/s, 0.15 ± 0.04 mJ, 0.14 ± 0.04 mW, 41.3 ± 15.7%, and 58.7 ± 15.7% from 4D Flow MRI; and 0.42 ± 0.20 m/s, 0.12 ± 0.05 mJ, 0.59 ± 0.30 mW, 40.2 ± 16.4%, and 59.8 ± 16.4% from CFD, respectively. The overall velocity field, KE, and PFD from the SVC were in agreement between modalities. However, PFD from the conduit and VD showed a large discrepancy between 4D Flow MRI and CFD, most likely due to spatial resolution and data noise. This study highlights the necessity for careful consideration when analyzing hemodynamic data from different modalities in Fontan patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article