Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined perforator flaps and lymphatic procedures in reconstructions after sarcoma resection.
Poskevicius, Audrius; Meroni, Matteo; Fuchs, Bruno; Scaglioni, Mario F.
Afiliación
  • Poskevicius A; Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Meroni M; Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Fuchs B; Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Scaglioni MF; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Microsurgery ; 44(1): e31119, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743714
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Soft tissue sarcomas are a subtle category of tumors that often require an extensive surgical resection for definitive treatment. This kind of intervention inevitably leads to large tissue damage and, when regions with rich lymphatic network are involved, postoperative complications such as lymphocele or lymphedema are quite common. In this report we present our experience with the combination of lymphatic procedures with perforator flaps for defects reconstruction and lymphatic complications preventions after sarcoma resection throughout the body.

METHODS:

Between 2019 and 2021, 15 patients underwent a surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma, also including bone tissue in 2 cases, requiring soft tissue reconstruction. A perforator flap reconstruction surgery was performed in all cases. The median age was 59.8 years old (ranging 23-84), 8 patients were females and 7 were males. The lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery concept was applied to all cases, while other additional lymphatic procedures were chosen individually for every patient.

RESULTS:

All patients were successfully treated without any perioperative complications. In 3 cases infected seroma was encountered in the acceptor site and then successfully treated by means of debridement and vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy. 2 patients experienced postoperative lymphedema in the acceptor site which was managed by secondary procedures. Good functional and aesthetic outcomes were achieved in all cases. The mean follow-up was 19.6 months (range 10-33 months).

CONCLUSIONS:

Different combinations of modern lymphatic procedures can be created to find the best solution and tailor the treatment to the patient's needs. Preventative measures regarding lymphatic complications can be highly effective and should be taken into consideration in every reconstructive approach following large soft tissue defects with impairment of the lymphatic network.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sarcoma / Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Colgajo Perforante / Linfedema Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Microsurgery Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sarcoma / Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Colgajo Perforante / Linfedema Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Microsurgery Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza