Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomarker Qualification for Neurofilament Light Chain in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Theory and Practice.
Benatar, Michael; Ostrow, Lyle W; Lewcock, Joseph W; Bennett, Frank; Shefner, Jeremy; Bowser, Robert; Larkin, Paul; Bruijn, Lucie; Wuu, Joanne.
Afiliación
  • Benatar M; Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Ostrow LW; Department of Neurology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lewcock JW; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
  • Bennett F; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
  • Shefner J; Denali Therapeutics, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Bowser R; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
  • Larkin P; Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
  • Bruijn L; CReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
  • Wuu J; Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ann Neurol ; 95(2): 211-216, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110839
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore whether the utility of neurofilament light chain (NfL), as a biomarker to aid amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development, would be enhanced by obtaining formal qualification from the US Food and Drug Administration for a defined context-of-use.

METHODS:

Consensus discussion among academic, industry, and patient advocacy group representatives.

RESULTS:

A wealth of scientific evidence supports the use of NfL as a prognostic, response, and potential safety biomarker in the broad ALS population, and as a risk/susceptibility biomarker among the subset of SOD1 pathogenic variant carriers. Although NfL has not yet been formally qualified for any of these contexts-of-use, the US Food and Drug Administration has provided accelerated approval for an SOD1-lowering antisense oligonucleotide, based partially on the recognition that a reduction in NfL is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit.

INTERPRETATION:

The increasing incorporation of NfL into ALS therapy development plans provides evidence that its utility-as a prognostic, response, risk/susceptibility, and/or safety biomarker-is already widely accepted by the community. The willingness of the US Food and Drug Administration to base regulatory decisions on rigorous peer-reviewed data-absent formal qualification, leads us to conclude that formal qualification, despite some benefits, is not essential for ongoing and future use of NfL as a tool to aid ALS therapy development. Although the balance of considerations for and against seeking NfL biomarker qualification will undoubtedly vary across different diseases and contexts-of-use, the robustness of the published data and careful deliberations of the ALS community may offer valuable insights for other disease communities grappling with the same issues. ANN NEUROL 2024;95211-216.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Neurol / Ann. neurol / Annals of neurology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Neurol / Ann. neurol / Annals of neurology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos