Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated Prognosis Marker Assessment in Breast Cancers Using BLEACH&STAIN Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry.
Mandelkow, Tim; Bady, Elena; Lurati, Magalie C J; Raedler, Jonas B; Müller, Jan H; Huang, Zhihao; Vettorazzi, Eik; Lennartz, Maximilian; Clauditz, Till S; Lebok, Patrick; Steinhilper, Lisa; Woelber, Linn; Sauter, Guido; Berkes, Enikö; Bühler, Simon; Paluchowski, Peter; Heilenkötter, Uwe; Müller, Volkmar; Schmalfeldt, Barbara; von der Assen, Albert; Jacobsen, Frank; Krech, Till; Krech, Rainer H; Simon, Ronald; Bernreuther, Christian; Steurer, Stefan; Burandt, Eike; Blessin, Niclas C.
Afiliación
  • Mandelkow T; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bady E; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Lurati MCJ; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Raedler JB; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Müller JH; College of Arts and Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • Huang Z; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Vettorazzi E; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Lennartz M; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Clauditz TS; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Lebok P; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Steinhilper L; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Woelber L; Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
  • Sauter G; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Berkes E; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bühler S; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Paluchowski P; Department of Gynecology, Albertinen Clinic Schnelsen, 22457 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Heilenkötter U; Department of Gynecology, Amalie Sieveking Clinic, 22359 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Müller V; Department of Gynecology, Regio Clinic Pinneberg, 25421 Pinneberg, Germany.
  • Schmalfeldt B; Department of Gynecology, Clinical Centre Itzehoe, 25524 Itzehoe, Germany.
  • von der Assen A; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Jacobsen F; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Krech T; Breast Center Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
  • Krech RH; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Simon R; Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
  • Bernreuther C; Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
  • Steurer S; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Burandt E; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Blessin NC; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Biomedicines ; 11(12)2023 Nov 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38137396
ABSTRACT
Prognostic markers in routine clinical management of breast cancer are often assessed using RNA-based multi-gene panels that depend on fluctuating tumor purity. Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) holds the potential for an improved risk assessment. To enable automated prognosis marker detection (i.e., progesterone receptor [PR], estrogen receptor [ER], androgen receptor [AR], GATA3, TROP2, HER2, PD-L1, Ki67, TOP2A), a framework for automated breast cancer identification was developed and validated involving thirteen different artificial intelligence analysis steps and an algorithm for cell distance analysis using 11+1-marker-BLEACH&STAIN-mfIHC staining in 1404 invasive breast cancers of no special type (NST). The framework for automated breast cancer detection discriminated normal glands from malignant glands with an accuracy of 98.4%. This approach identified that five (PR, ER, AR, GATA3, PD-L1) of nine biomarkers were associated with prolonged overall survival (p ≤ 0.0095 each) and two of these (PR, AR) were found to be independent risk factors in multivariate analysis (p ≤ 0.0151 each). The combined assessment of PR-ER-AR-GATA3-PD-L1 as a five-marker prognosis score showed strong prognostic relevance (p < 0.0001) and was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0034). Automated breast cancer detection in combination with an artificial intelligence-based analysis of mfIHC enables a rapid and reliable analysis of multiple prognostic parameters. The strict limitation of the analysis to malignant cells excludes the impact of fluctuating tumor purity on assay precision.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biomedicines Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biomedicines Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania