Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inline dynamometry provides reliable measurements of quadriceps strength in healthy and ACL-reconstructed individuals and is a valid substitute for isometric electromechanical dynamometry following ACL reconstruction.
Norris, Richard; Morrison, Scot; Price, Alan; Pulford, Sian; Meira, Erik; O'Neill, Seth; Williams, Huw; Maddox, Thomas W; Carter, Paul; Oldershaw, Rachel A.
Afiliación
  • Norris R; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and L
  • Morrison S; Physio Praxis PLLC, University Place, WA, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy.
  • Price A; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom.
  • Pulford S; Department of Medical Therapy and Support Services, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Thomas Dr, Liverpool L14 3LB, United Kingdom.
  • Meira E; Physical Therapy Science Communication Group, Happy Valley, Oregon, USA.
  • O'Neill S; School of Healthcare, Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.
  • Williams H; Department of Medical Therapy and Support Services, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Thomas Dr, Liverpool L14 3LB, United Kingdom.
  • Maddox TW; Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, United Kingdom; Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Institute of Infection
  • Carter P; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom.
  • Oldershaw RA; Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, United Kingdom; MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in
Knee ; 46: 136-147, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142660
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quadriceps strength testing is recommended to guide rehabilitation and mitigate the risk of second injury following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hand-held dynamometry is a practical alternative to electromechanical dynamometry but demonstrates insufficient reliability and criterion validity in healthy and ACL-reconstructed participants respectively. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of inline dynamometry for measuring quadriceps strength. The hypotheses are that intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values will be >0.90 for reliability and concurrent validity.

METHODS:

This was a cross sectional study using a within-participant, repeated measures design. Isometric quadriceps testing was performed at 60° knee flexion in 50 healthy and 52 ACL-reconstructed participants. Interrater reliability, intrarater reliability, and concurrent validity of inline dynamometry was investigated through calculation of ICCs, Bland-Altman analysis, linear regression, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).

RESULTS:

The lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals were >0.90 for all reliability and validity ICCs in healthy and ACL-reconstructed participants, except for intrarater reliability in healthy participants using absolute scores (ICC = 0.936 [95% CI 0.890-0.963]). In ACL-reconstructed participants, Bland-Altman bias was 0.01 Nm/kg for absolute and average scores, limits of agreement were -11.74% to 12.59% for absolute scores, the SEM was 0.13Nm/kg (95% CI 0.10-0.17) and the MDC was 0.36Nm/kg (95% CI 0.28 - 0.47).

CONCLUSION:

Inline dynamometry is a reliable and economical alternative to electromechanical dynamometry for the assessment of quadriceps strength following ACL-reconstruction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05109871).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Knee Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Knee Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article