Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and update on diagnosis and treatment of new onset sacroiliac joint dysfunction after lumbar fusion.
Karimi, Helen; Rodrigues, Rahul; Patel, Shrey; Patel, Jainith; Kosarchuk, Jacob; Kryzanski, James.
Afiliación
  • Karimi H; Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. helen.karimi@tufts.edu.
  • Rodrigues R; Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
  • Patel S; Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
  • Patel J; Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
  • Kosarchuk J; Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
  • Kryzanski J; Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 43, 2024 Jan 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280117
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion has become increasingly recognized as the utilization of lumbar fusion has grown. Despite the significant morbidity associated with this condition, uncertainty regarding its diagnosis and treatment remains. We aim to update the current knowledge of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of post-lumbar surgery SIJD.

METHODS:

PRISMA guidelines were used to search the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and OVID databases for literature published in the last 10 years. The ROBIS tool was utilized for risk of bias assessment. Statistical analyses were performed using the R foundation. A Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the risk of SIJD based on operative technique, gender, and symptom onset timeline. Odds ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals. A p-value [Formula see text] 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

Seventeen publications were included. The incidence of new onset SIJD was 7.0%. The mean age was 56 years, and the follow-up length was 30 months. SIJD was more common with fixed lumbar fusion vs floating fusion (OR = 1.48 [0.92, 2.37], p = 0.083), fusion of [Formula see text] 3 segments (p < 0.05), and male gender increased incidence of SIJD (OR = 1.93 [1.27, 2.98], p = 0.001). Intra-articular injection decreased the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score by 75%, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduced the score by 90%. An open approach resulted in a 13% reduction in VAS score versus 68 and 29% for SIJ fixation using the iFuse and DIANA approaches, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Lumbar fusion predisposes patients to SIJD, likely through manipulation of the SIJ's biomechanics. Definitive diagnosis of SIJD remains multifaceted and a newer modality such as SPECT/CT may find a future role. When conservative measures are ineffective, RFA and SIJ fixation using the iFuse System yield the greatest improvement VAS and ODI.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación Sacroiliaca / Fusión Vertebral Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación Sacroiliaca / Fusión Vertebral Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos