Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Engaging health care professionals in quality improvement: A qualitative study exploring the synergies between projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation in quality improvement collaborative implementation in Denmark.
Carstensen, Kathrine; Goldman, Joanne; Kjeldsen, Anne Mette; Lou, Stina; Nielsen, Camilla Palmhøj.
Afiliación
  • Carstensen K; PhD Student, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Goldman J; Assistant Professor, Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety and Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Kjeldsen AM; Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Lou S; Senior Researcher and Associate Professor, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Nielsen CP; Research Director and Associate Professor, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region and Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Health Serv Res Policy ; 29(3): 163-172, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308439
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation forming health care professions' engagement in quality improvement collaborative (QIC) implementation in Denmark, and to analyse the synergies and tensions between the two projects given the opportunities afforded by the QICs.

METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional interview study with professionals involved in the implementation of two national QICs in Denmark involving 23 individual interviews and focus group discussions with 75 people representing different professional groups. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the data, drawing on institutional contributions to organisational studies of professions.

RESULTS:

Study participants engaged widely in QIC implementation. This engagement was formed by a constructive interplay between the professions' projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation, with only few tensions identified. The project of professionalisation relates to a self-oriented agenda of contributing professional expertise and promoting professional recognition and development, while the project of institutionalisation focuses on improving health care processes and outcomes and advancing quality improvement. Both projects were largely similar across professional groups. The interplay between the two projects was enabled by the bottom-up approach to implementation, participation of QI specialists, and a clear focus on developing and delivering high-quality patient care.

CONCLUSIONS:

Future strategies for QIC implementation should position QICs as a framework that promotes the integration of professions' projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation to successfully engage professionals in the implementation process, and thereby optimise the effectiveness of QICs in health care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personal de Salud / Conducta Cooperativa / Investigación Cualitativa / Mejoramiento de la Calidad Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Health Serv Res Policy Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personal de Salud / Conducta Cooperativa / Investigación Cualitativa / Mejoramiento de la Calidad Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Health Serv Res Policy Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca