Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concordance and discordance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and conventional culture method for diagnosis of Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.
Zahid, Qurat-Ul-Ain; Khursheed, Nazia; Adnan, Fareeha; Zafar, Adeel.
Afiliación
  • Zahid QU; Dr. Qurat-ul-Ain Zahid, Department of Pathology, Section of Microbiology Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Khursheed N; Dr. Nazia Khursheed, FCPS. Department of Pathology, Section of Microbiology Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Adnan F; Dr. Fareeha Adnana, FCPS. Department of Pathology, Section of Microbiology Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Zafar A; Dr. Adeel Zafar, Department of Pathology, Section of Microbiology Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci ; 40(2ICON Suppl): S64-S69, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328643
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To identify concordance and discordance between GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and gold standard bacteriologic culture for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in Extra-Pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) specimens in our region.

Methods:

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the Indus Hospital and Health Network. Data from 1st January, 2020 to 31st December, 2021 was analyzed. A total of 1499 EPTB specimens were included for which GeneXpert was requested along with acid-fast bacteria (AFB) culture from the same specimen. Specimens were processed according to specimen type following standard operating procedures of the laboratory. Fluorescent staining was performed on all specimens along with bacteriologic culture. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay was carried out in exact accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Results:

Out of 1499 EPTB specimens, 1370 (91.39%) specimens exhibited concordance between GeneXpert and conventional culture method, while 129 (8.60%) specimens showed discordance. GeneXpert exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 69.4% and 94.3% respectively in comparison to culture.

Conclusion:

GeneXpert sensitivity for the diagnosis of EPTB varied with the site involved. Lower sensitivity was observed in ascitic and pleural fluids as compared to higher sensitivity observed among urine samples and pus aspirates. However, given the quick turnaround time and ease of use, it is a helpful tool in the diagnosis of EPTB when utilized in the appropriate clinical context. Caution is advised while interpreting negative GeneXpert results in endemic settings and should be interpreted along with other supporting clinical and diagnostic features.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pak J Med Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pak J Med Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán