Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mitral valve repair using a semi-rigid posterior band: a 10-year Japanese single-center experience of 244 patients.
Takagi, Kazuyoshi; Arinaga, Koichi; Takaseya, Tohru; Otsuka, Hiroyuki; Shojima, Takahiro; Kono, Takanori; Zaima, Yasuyuki; Saku, Kosuke; Oryoji, Atsunobu; Tayama, Eiki.
Afiliación
  • Takagi K; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Arinaga K; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Takaseya T; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Otsuka H; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Shojima T; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Kono T; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Zaima Y; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Saku K; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Oryoji A; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
  • Tayama E; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
J Thorac Dis ; 16(1): 333-343, 2024 Jan 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410614
ABSTRACT

Background:

Mitral valve repair (MVr) is an established procedure for patients who require surgery for primary mitral regurgitation (PMR). The Colvin-Galloway Future Band (CGFB) is a semi-rigid posterior band expected to improve the clinical outcomes of MVr. However, information on the hemodynamic and functional performance and long-term outcomes of CGFB is limited. We evaluated the quality, durability, and clinical performance after MVr using CGFB for PMR as the cohort study.

Methods:

A total of 244 patients who underwent MVr with CGFB were enrolled. Clinical and echocardiographic assessments were performed (mean follow-up period, 4.0±2.4 years).

Results:

Posterior mitral leaflet resection was the most common MVr procedure. CGFBs measuring 28 mm (35.2%) and 30 mm (36.5%) were used. The incidence of systolic anterior motion (SAM) was 1.6%. A total of 93.4% of the patients had no or trace MR at discharge. Over 90% of patients had no or mild MR at the last follow-up. The mean pressure gradient and mitral valve orifice area one year after MVr ranged between 2.6 and 3.6 mmHg and 2.3 and 3.4 cm2, respectively. At follow-up, 85.4% of the patients were New York Heart Association class I. Three patients underwent repeat mitral valve surgery.

Conclusions:

The CGFB demonstrates satisfactory quality and durability in MVr for PMR. Other advantages include a low occurrence of SAM and acceptable hemodynamic outcomes, particularly in patients requiring a smaller annuloplasty device.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón