Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is American Joint Replacement Registry Data Consistent With International Survivorship in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Analysis.
Springer, Bryan D; Mullen, Kyle P; Donnelly, Patrick C; Tucker, Keith; Caton, Edward; Huddleston, James I.
Afiliación
  • Springer BD; OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center and Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Mullen KP; American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemount, Illinois.
  • Donnelly PC; American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemount, Illinois.
  • Tucker K; Orthopedic Device Evaluation Panel, London, England, UK.
  • Caton E; NEC Software Solutions, London, England.
  • Huddleston JI; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Standford University, Palo Alto, California.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(9S1): S46-S50, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417557
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In collaboration with the Orthopedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP), the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) investigated the consistency of hip and knee arthroplasty survivorship results compared to the UK National Joint Registry (NJR).

METHODS:

A total of three primary knee devices and three primary hip devices were selected by AJRR and ODEP with known variation in performance. Implant manufacturers independently produced Kaplan Meier survivorship based on NJR data and submitted to ODEP for comparison. The AJRR mirrored the methodology, and results from both sources were stratified into three cohorts (all-age, < 65, and ≥ 65 years).

RESULTS:

There were 42,671 AJRR and 60,439 NJR primary knee cases and 70,169 AJRR and 422,657 NJR primary total hip arthroplasty cases. For TKA, performance between the AJRR and NJR were consistent, showing similar trends for comparatively high and low performing devices. Both PS and CR devices showed statistical agreement in survivorship for all 3 cohorts. Unicompartmental comparison also showed statistical agreement for the Medicare cohort. The all-age and < 65-year-old cohorts showed similar trends and reached statistical agreement through 7 and 6 years. For total hip arthroplasty, performance between the AJRR and NJR were consistent, showing similar trends for comparatively high and low performing devices; 0.18% average difference in survivorship at final follow-up (8 years). One femoral device did not reach statistical agreement but showed only 0.61% difference in survivorship. The remaining acetabular and femoral devices reached statistical agreement in all-ages and through 7 and 8 years in the ≥ 65-year-old cohort.

CONCLUSIONS:

AJRR and NJR performance trends and survivorship were similar across hip and knee arthroplasty with greatest consistency in the all-age and ≥ 65 cohorts. This focused comparison of survivorship showed encouraging results for reliability of patient outcomes in AJRR compared to the world's largest joint arthroplasty registry which has strong implications for global improvement in patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Falla de Prótesis / Sistema de Registros / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Falla de Prótesis / Sistema de Registros / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article