Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing ocrelizumab to interferon/glatiramer acetate in people with multiple sclerosis over age 60.
Foong, Yi Chao; Merlo, Daniel; Gresle, Melissa; Buzzard, Katherine; Zhong, Michael; Yeh, Wei Zhen; Jokubaitis, Vilija; Monif, Mastura; Skibina, Olga; Ozakbas, Serkan; Patti, Francesco; Grammond, Pierre; Amato, Maria Pia; Kalincik, Tomas; Horakova, Dana; Kubala Havrdova, Eva; Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca; Lechner Scott, Jeanette; Boz, Cavit; Sa, Maria Jose; Butzkueven, Helmut; van der Walt, Anneke; Zhu, Chao.
Afiliación
  • Foong YC; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Merlo D; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gresle M; Department of Neurology, Tasmanian Health Service, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Buzzard K; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Zhong M; Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
  • Yeh WZ; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Jokubaitis V; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Monif M; Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Skibina O; Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ozakbas S; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Patti F; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Grammond P; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Amato MP; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kalincik T; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Horakova D; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kubala Havrdova E; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Weinstock-Guttman B; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lechner Scott J; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Boz C; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Sa MJ; Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
  • Butzkueven H; Medical Point Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • van der Walt A; Neuroscience, University of Catania Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Advanced Technologies 'G.F. Ingrassia', Catania, Italy.
  • Zhu C; University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453478
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ongoing controversy exists regarding optimal management of disease modifying therapy (DMT) in older people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). There is concern that the lower relapse rate, combined with a higher risk of DMT-related infections and side effects, may alter the risk-benefit balance in older pwMS. Given the lack of pwMS above age 60 in randomised controlled trials, the comparative efficacy of high-efficacy DMTs such as ocrelizumab has not been shown in older pwMS. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of ocrelizumab, a high-efficacy DMT, versus interferon/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) in pwMS over the age of 60.

METHODS:

Using data from MSBase registry, this multicentre cohort study included pwMS above 60 who switched to or started on ocrelizumab or IFN/GA. We analysed relapse and disability outcomes after balancing covariates using an inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Propensity scores were obtained based on age, country, disease duration, sex, baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale, prior relapses (all-time, 12 months and 24 months) and prior DMT exposure (overall number and high-efficacy DMTs). After weighting, all covariates were balanced. Primary outcomes were time to first relapse and annualised relapse rate (ARR). Secondary outcomes were 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) and confirmed disability improvement (CDI).

RESULTS:

A total of 248 participants received ocrelizumab, while 427 received IFN/GA. The IPTW-weighted ARR for ocrelizumab was 0.01 and 0.08 for IFN/GA. The IPTW-weighted ARR ratio was 0.15 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.33, p<0.001) for ocrelizumab compared with IFN/GA. On IPTW-weighted Cox regression models, HR for time to first relapse was 0.13 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.26, p<0.001). The hazard of first relapse was significantly reduced in ocrelizumab users after 5 months compared with IFN/GA users. However, the two groups did not differ in CDP or CDI over 3.57 years.

CONCLUSION:

In older pwMS, ocrelizumab effectively reduced relapses compared with IFN/GA. Overall relapse activity was low. This study adds valuable real-world data for informed DMT decision making with older pwMS. Our study also confirms that there is a treatment benefit in older people with MS, given the existence of a clear differential treatment effect between ocrelizumab and IFN/GA in the over 60 age group.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia