Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hospital Variation in Epinephrine Administration Before Defibrillation for Cardiac Arrest Due to Shockable Rhythm.
Stewart, Colten; Chan, Paul S; Kennedy, Kevin; Swanson, Morgan B; Girotra, Saket.
Afiliación
  • Stewart C; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
  • Chan PS; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO.
  • Kennedy K; Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
  • Swanson MB; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO.
  • Girotra S; Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Crit Care Med ; 52(6): 878-886, 2024 06 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502800
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Contrary to advanced cardiac life support guidelines that recommend immediate defibrillation for shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), epinephrine administration before first defibrillation is common and associated with lower survival at a "patient-level." Whether this practice varies across hospitals and its association with "hospital-level" IHCA survival remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine hospital variation in rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation for shockable IHCA and its association with IHCA survival.

DESIGN:

Observational cohort study.

SETTING:

Five hundred thirteen hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines Resuscitation Registry. PATIENTS A total of 37,668 adult patients with IHCA due to an initial shockable rhythm from 2000 to 2019.

INTERVENTIONS:

Epinephrine before first defibrillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Using multivariable hierarchical regression, we examined hospital variation in epinephrine administration before first defibrillation and its association with hospital-level rates of risk-adjusted survival. The median hospital rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation was 18.8%, with large variation across sites (range, 0-68.8%; median odds ratio 1.54; 95% CI, 1.47-1.61). Major teaching status and annual IHCA volume were associated with hospital rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation. Compared with hospitals with the lowest rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation (Q1), there was a stepwise decline in risk-adjusted survival at hospitals with higher rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation (Q1 44.3%, Q2 43.4%; Q3 41.9%; Q4 40.3%; p for trend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Administration of epinephrine before defibrillation in shockable IHCA is common and varies markedly across U.S. hospitals. Hospital rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation were associated with a significant stepwise decrease in hospital rates of risk-adjusted survival. Efforts to prioritize immediate defibrillation for patients with shockable IHCA and avoid early epinephrine administration are urgently needed.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardioversión Eléctrica / Epinefrina / Paro Cardíaco Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardioversión Eléctrica / Epinefrina / Paro Cardíaco Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article