Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Informational letters or postcards to initiate remote monitoring among veterans with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A randomized, controlled trial.
Kratka, Allison; Rotering, Thomas L; Raitt, Merritt H; Whooley, Mary A; Dhruva, Sanket S.
Afiliación
  • Kratka A; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Rotering TL; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Raitt MH; Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Whooley MA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, United States.
  • Dhruva SS; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 47(5): 642-649, 2024 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556540
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Remote monitoring (RM) of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is a Class 1, Level of Evidence A recommendation because of its multitude of clinical benefits. However, RM adherence rates are suboptimal, precluding patients from achieving these benefits. There is a need for direct-to-patient efforts to improve adherence.

METHODS:

In this national randomized, controlled trial conducted in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), 2120 patients with a pacemaker or ICD who had not sent an RM transmission for ≥1 year (and usually ≥3 years) while under VHA care for their device were randomly assigned to be mailed a postcard (n = 1076) or a detailed letter (n = 1044). The postcard described what RM does and its key benefits (reduced mortality and fewer in-person visits). The letter provided a similar message but included more details about RM benefits and the process. The primary outcome was an RM transmission sent within 90 days of mailing, and a secondary outcome was an RM transmission sent within 365 days.

RESULTS:

The primary outcome was achieved in 121 (11.3%) in the postcard and 96 patients (9.2%) in the letter group (p = .12). The secondary outcome was achieved in 266 (24.7%) and 239 (22.9%), respectively (p = .32).

CONCLUSIONS:

This randomized trial showed no significant difference in the proportion of chronically non-adherent patients who sent an RM transmission after receiving a low-cost postcard or a detailed, higher-cost letter encouraging their participation in RM. However, as only a minority of patients responded to either, further work is needed to engage patients in the life-saving benefits of RM.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Veteranos / Desfibriladores Implantables Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Veteranos / Desfibriladores Implantables Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos