Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Carbon emission prediction models: A review.
Jin, Yukai; Sharifi, Ayyoob; Li, Zhisheng; Chen, Sirui; Zeng, Suzhen; Zhao, Shanlun.
Afiliación
  • Jin Y; Urban Environmental Science Lab (URBES), Graduate School of Innovation and Practice for Smart Society, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8529, Japan; School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong, 510006, China.
  • Sharifi A; The IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8529, Japan; School of Architecture and Design, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon. Electronic address: sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
  • Li Z; School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong, 510006, China.
  • Chen S; School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong, 510006, China.
  • Zeng S; School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong, 510006, China; School of Ocean Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong, 519000, China.
  • Zhao S; School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Sci Total Environ ; 927: 172319, 2024 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599410
ABSTRACT
Amidst growing concerns over the greenhouse effect, especially its consequential impacts, establishing effective Carbon Emission Prediction Models (CEPMs) to comprehend and predict CO2 emission trends is imperative for climate change mitigation. A review of 147 Carbon Emission Prediction Model (CEPM) studies revealed three predominant functions-prediction, optimization, and prediction factor selection. Statistical models, comprising 75 instances, were the most prevalent among prediction models, followed by neural network models at 21.8 %. The consistent rise in neural network model usage, particularly feedforward architectures, was observed from 2019 to 2022. A majority of CEPMs incorporated optimized approaches, with 94.4 % utilizing metaheuristic models. Parameter optimization was the primary focus, followed by structure optimization. Prediction factor selection models, employing Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for statistical and machine learning models, respectively, filtered factors effectively. Scrutinizing accuracy, pre-optimized CEPMs exhibited varied performance, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values spanned from 0.112 to 1635 Mt, while post-optimization led to a notable improvement, the minimum RMSE reached 0.0003 Mt, and the maximum was 95.14 Mt. Finally, we summarized the pros and cons of existing models, classified and counted the factors that influence carbon emissions, clarified the research objectives in CEPM and assessed the applied model evaluation methods and the spatial and temporal scales of existing research.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China