Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resting and activated bovine neutrophils and eosinophils differ in their responses to adrenergic agonists.
Howell, Angela; Arsic, Natasa; Griebel, Philip.
Afiliación
  • Howell A; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO), University of Saskatchewan, 120-Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E3, Canada; Global Institute for Food Security (GIFS), University of Saskatchewan, 421 Downey Rd, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4L8, Canada.
  • Arsic N; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO), University of Saskatchewan, 120-Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E3, Canada.
  • Griebel P; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO), University of Saskatchewan, 120-Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E3, Canada; School of Public Health, 104 Clinic Place, University of Saskatchewan, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada. Electronic address: philip.griebel@usask.ca.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 272: 110758, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669937
ABSTRACT
Polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) provide a rapid response to infection and tissue damage and stress can modify these critical innate immune defences. The study of adrenergic receptor (AR) expression and function in bovine PMNs is limited but both neutrophils and eosinophils express numerous AR genes but differ significantly in their expression of individual AR genes. A flow cytometric technique was developed to differentiate between bovine neutrophils and eosinophils so both neutrophil and eosinophil responses to adrenergic agonists could be analysed. Neutrophils and eosinophils displayed significantly different changes in CD11b, L-selectin, and CD44 expression when activated by bovine serum opsonized zymosan and recombinant bovine interferon gamma. The responses of activated and resting neutrophils and eosinophils were then compared following stimulation with endogenous adrenergic agonists, epinephrine (E) norepinephrine (NE), and synthetic agonists targeting α1-, α2-, or ß-ARs. Both resting and activated neutrophils and eosinophils displayed differences in iROS, CD44, and L-selectin expression following stimulation with E and NE. Resting neutrophils displayed pro-inflammatory responses to both E and NE, while resting eosinophils displayed a pro-inflammatory response to only NE. No single synthetic adrenergic agonist fully recapitulated responses observed with either E or NE and responses to adrenergic agonists were dose-dependent. In conclusion, bovine eosinophils and neutrophils responded to multiple adrenergic agonists by altering expression of proteins involved in immune surveillance and pro-inflammatory responses. Significant differences in neutrophil and eosinophil responses to adrenergic agonists are consistent with their differences in AR gene expression. This highlights the importance of analysing separately these two PMN subpopulations when investigating the effects of either endogenous or synthetic AR agonists.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Epinefrina / Norepinefrina / Selectina L / Eosinófilos / Neutrófilos Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Immunol Immunopathol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Epinefrina / Norepinefrina / Selectina L / Eosinófilos / Neutrófilos Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Immunol Immunopathol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article