Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Mycoplasma genitalium and Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Htaik, Kay; Vodstrcil, Lenka A; Plummer, Erica L; Sfameni, Amelia M; Machalek, Dorothy A; Manhart, Lisa E; Bradshaw, Catriona S.
Afiliación
  • Htaik K; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Vodstrcil LA; School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Plummer EL; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Sfameni AM; School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Machalek DA; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Manhart LE; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bradshaw CS; School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 Jun 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845565
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Differences in opinion concerning the contribution of M. genitalium to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has resulted in inconsistencies across global testing and treatment guidelines. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between M. genitalium and PID and M. genitalium positivity within PID cases to provide a contemporary evidence base to inform clinical practice (PROSPERO registration CRD42022382156).

METHODS:

PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science were searched to Dec 1, 2023 for studies that assessed women for PID using established clinical criteria and used nucleic acid amplification tests to detect M. genitalium. We calculated summary estimates of the 1) association of M. genitalium with PID (pooled odds ratio [OR]) and 2) proportion of PID cases with M. genitalium detected (pooled M. genitalium positivity in PID), using random-effects meta-analyses, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS:

Nineteen studies were included 10 estimated M. genitalium association with PID, and 19 estimated M. genitalium positivity in PID. M. genitalium infection was significantly associated with PID (pooled OR=1.67 [95%CI 1.24-2.24]). The pooled positivity of M. genitalium in PID was 10.3% [95%CI 5.63-15.99]. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that M. genitalium positivity in PID was highest in the Americas, in studies conducted in both inpatient and outpatient clinic settings, and in populations at high risk of sexually transmitted infections.

CONCLUSIONS:

M. genitalium was associated with a 67% increase in odds of PID and was detected in about one in ten clinical diagnoses of PID. These data support testing women for M. genitalium at initial PID diagnosis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis / Clin. infect. dis / Clinical infectious diseases Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis / Clin. infect. dis / Clinical infectious diseases Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia