Sonography vs. excretory urography in acute flank pain.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 144(6): 1235-8, 1985 Jun.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-3890487
A prospective study compared the diagnostic accuracy of sonography and excretory urography in determining the cause of acute flank pain in 61 patients. Forty-one patients had urinary tract stone disease. Of these, five had nonobstructing renal stones and 36 had obstructing stones. A correct diagnosis was made by urography in 85% and by sonography in 66%. Small stones at the ureterovesical junction were more accurately diagnosed by sonography (79%) than by urography (68%). In all the patients where sonography failed to detect the offending stone, the stone was calcified and evident on the plain radiographs. There were no false-positive diagnoses in the patients clinically judged to have passed a renal stone (nine patients) or whose pain was arising outside of the urinary tract (five patients). Neither sonography (17%) nor urography (50%) was accurate in diagnosing acute pyelonephritis in the six patients with this diagnosis. Although sonography is not as accurate overall as urography in acute flank pain, it is a viable alternative in those with recurrent renal colic due to stone disease and in the pregnant patient.
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Dolor
/
Urografía
/
Cálculos Urinarios
/
Ultrasonografía
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Año:
1985
Tipo del documento:
Article