Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neurocognitive and psychiatric outcomes associated with postacute COVID-19 infection without severe medical complication: a meta-analysis.
Knapp, Sarah A B; Austin, David S; Aita, Stephen L; Caron, Joshua E; Owen, Tyler; Borgogna, Nicholas C; Del Bene, Victor A; Roth, Robert M; Milberg, William P; Hill, Benjamin D.
Afiliación
  • Knapp SAB; Department of Mental Health, VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, Maine, USA.
  • Austin DS; Department of Mental Health, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
  • Aita SL; Department of Mental Health, VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, Maine, USA.
  • Caron JE; Department of Mental Health, VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, Maine, USA stephen.aita@va.gov.
  • Owen T; Department of Psychology, University of Maine System, Orono, Maine, USA.
  • Borgogna NC; Department of Mental Health, VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, Maine, USA.
  • Del Bene VA; Department of Psychology, University of Maine System, Orono, Maine, USA.
  • Roth RM; Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
  • Milberg WP; Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
  • Hill BD; Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914455
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cognitive symptoms are often reported by those with a history of COVID-19 infection. No comprehensive meta-analysis of neurocognitive outcomes related to COVID-19 exists despite the influx of studies after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study meta-analysed observational research comparing cross-sectional neurocognitive outcomes in adults with COVID-19 (without severe medical/psychiatric comorbidity) to healthy controls (HCs) or norm-referenced data.

METHODS:

Data were extracted from 54 studies published between January 2020 and June 2023. Hedges' g was used to index effect sizes, which were pooled using random-effects modelling. Moderating variables were investigated using meta-regression and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS:

Omnibus meta-analysis of 696 effect sizes extracted across 54 studies (COVID-19 n=6676, HC/norm-reference n=12 986; average time since infection=~6 months) yielded a small but significant effect indicating patients with COVID-19 performed slightly worse than HCs on cognitive measures (g=-0.36; 95% CI=-0.45 to -0.28), with high heterogeneity (Q=242.30, p<0.001, τ=0.26). Significant within-domain effects was yielded by cognitive screener (g=-0.55; 95% CI=-0.75 to -0.36), processing speed (g=-0.44; 95% CI=-0.57 to -0.32), global cognition (g=-0.40; 95% CI=-0.71 to -0.09), simple/complex attention (g=-0.38; 95% CI=-0.46 to -0.29), learning/memory (g=-0.34; 95% CI=-0.46 to -0.22), language (g=-0.34; 95% CI=-0.45 to -0.24) and executive function (g=-0.32; 95% CI=-0.43 to -0.21); but not motor (g=-0.40; 95% CI=-0.89 to 0.10), visuospatial/construction (g=-0.09; 95% CI=-0.23 to 0.05) and orientation (g=-0.02; 95% CI=-0.17 to 0.14). COVID-19 samples with elevated depression, anxiety, fatigue and disease severity yielded larger effects.

CONCLUSION:

Mild cognitive deficits are associated with COVID-19 infection, especially as detected by cognitive screeners and processing speed tasks. We failed to observe clinically meaningful cognitive impairments (as measured by standard neuropsychological instruments) in people with COVID-19 without severe medical or psychiatric comorbidities.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos