Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Navigated augmented reality through a head-mounted display leads to low deviation between planned, intra- and postoperative parameters during glenoid component placement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept case series.
Rojas, J Tomás; Menzemer, Jennifer; Rashid, Mustafa S; Hayoz, Annabel; Lädermann, Alexandre; Zumstein, Matthias A.
Afiliación
  • Rojas JT; Shoulder, Elbow and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Sonnenhof Orthopaedics, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital San José-Clínica Santa María, Santiago, Chile.
  • Menzemer J; Shoulder, Elbow and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Sonnenhof Orthopaedics, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Rashid MS; East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, England, United Kingdom.
  • Hayoz A; Shoulder, Elbow and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Sonnenhof Orthopaedics, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Lädermann A; Research Department, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Zumstein MA; Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland. Electronic address: ses@sonnenhof.ch.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942222
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Navigated augmented reality (AR) through a head-mounted display (HMD) has led to accurate glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in an in-vitro setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the deviation between planned, intraoperative, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, and depth of the glenoid component placement during RSA, assisted by navigated AR through an HMD, in a surgical setting.

METHODS:

A prospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive patients undergoing RSA in 2 institutions, between August 2021 and January 2023, were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows age >18 years, surgery assisted by AR through an HMD, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at 6 weeks. All participants agreed to participate in the study and informed consent was provided in all cases. Preoperative CT scans were undertaken for all cases and used for 3-dimensional (3D) planning. Intraoperatively, glenoid preparation and component placement were assisted by a navigated AR system through an HMD in all patients. Intraoperative parameters were recorded by the system. A postoperative CT scan was undertaken at 6 weeks, and 3D reconstruction was performed to obtain postoperative parameters. The deviation between planned, intraoperative, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, and depth of the glenoid component placement was calculated. Outliers were defined as >5° for inclination and retroversion and >5 mm for entry point.

RESULTS:

Seventeen patients (9 females, 12 right shoulders) with a mean age of 72.8 ± 9.1 years (range, 47.0-82.0) met inclusion criteria. The mean deviation between intra- and postoperative measurements was 1.5° ± 1.0° (range, 0.0°-3.0°) for inclination, 2.8° ± 1.5° (range, 1.0°-4.5°) for retroversion, 1.8 ± 1.0 mm (range, 0.7-3.0 mm) for entry point, and 1.9 ± 1.9 mm (range, 0.0-4.5 mm) for depth. The mean deviation between planned and postoperative values was 2.5° ± 3.2° (range, 0.0°-11.0°) for inclination, 3.4° ± 4.6° (range, 0.0°-18.0°) for retroversion, 2.0 ± 2.5 mm (range, 0.0°-9.7°) for entry point, and 1.3 ± 1.6 mm (range, 1.3-4.5 mm) for depth. There were no outliers between intra- and postoperative values and there were 3 outliers between planned and postoperative values. The mean time (minutes seconds) for the tracker unit placement and the scapula registration was 0302 (range, 0148 to 0426) and 0816 (range, 0209 to 1758), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The use of a navigated AR system through an HMD in RSA led to low deviations between planned, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters for glenoid component placement.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg / J. shoulder elbow surg / Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Chile

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg / J. shoulder elbow surg / Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Chile