Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Initial validation of the Turkish version of the defense mechanisms rating scales-self-report-30.
Yilmaz, Meltem; Tas, Berke; Çelik, Deniz; Perry, J Christopher; Tanzilli, Annalisa; Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia; Lingiardi, Vittorio.
Afiliación
  • Yilmaz M; Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Tas B; Department of Psychology, TED University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Çelik D; Department of Psychology, Çankaya University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Perry JC; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University and Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry at Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Tanzilli A; Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Giuseppe M; Department of History, Humanities and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Lingiardi V; Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol ; 15: 1432170, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988381
ABSTRACT
The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30) was recently developed to add a self-report alternative to the assessment of defenses, reflecting their generally accepted hierarchical organization. In this study, we aimed to examine psychometric properties and factor structure of the Turkish language version of the DMRS-SR-30. The sample consisted of 1.002 participants who filled out a survey comprising the DMRS-SR-30, the Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Inventory of Personality Organization through Qualtrics. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a three-factor structure (CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.05) that confirms the DMRS theoretical frame with a relatively acceptable fit. Defensive categories and total scale scores showed good to excellent reliability (α values ranging from 0.64 to 0.89). Correlations between defenses, symptoms, and personality functioning demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. The individuals with clinically significant BSI scores (T-score ≥ 63) differed on the DMRS-SR-30 scores from the individuals in the non-clinical range. The Turkish version of the DMRS-SR-30 is a reliable and valid instrument to self-assess the hierarchy of defense mechanisms and overall defensive functioning. Moreover, the current study supports the validity of the tripartite model of defenses in a language and culture different from the origins of the DMRS and DMRS-SR-30.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia