Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family).
Wyman, Danielle; Butler, Laurie T; Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah; Bright, Peter; Barber, Julie; Budgett, Jessica; Walters, Kate; Lang, Iain; Rapaport, Penny; Banks, Sara; Palomo, Marina; Orgeta, Vasiliki; Livingston, Gill; Rockwood, Kenneth; Lord, Kathryn; Manthorpe, Jill; Dow, Briony; Hoe, Juanita; Cooper, Claudia.
Afiliación
  • Wyman D; Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Psychology and Sport Science at Anglia Ruskin University, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
  • Butler LT; Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Psychology and Sport Science at Anglia Ruskin University, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
  • Morgan-Trimmer S; University of Exeter, The Medical School, Exeter, UK.
  • Bright P; Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Psychology and Sport Science at Anglia Ruskin University, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
  • Barber J; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
  • Budgett J; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK.
  • Walters K; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
  • Lang I; University of Exeter, The Medical School, Exeter, UK.
  • Rapaport P; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK.
  • Banks S; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK.
  • Palomo M; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Clinical Psychology, St. Pancras Hospital, 4 St. Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK.
  • Orgeta V; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
  • Livingston G; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, Floor 6 Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
  • Rockwood K; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Suite 1421-5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
  • Lord K; Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, UK.
  • Manthorpe J; Social Care Workforce Research Unit, Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NN, UK.
  • Dow B; National Ageing Research Institute Ltd, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Hoe J; Gellar Institute of Ageing and Memory, School of Medicine, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK.
  • Cooper C; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London E1 2AB, UK.
Age Ageing ; 53(8)2024 Aug 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39171389
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We report a mixed-methods process evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled trial. We aimed to test and refine a theory of change model hypothesising key causal assumptions to understand how the New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-Family (a manualised, multimodal psychosocial intervention), was effective relative to usual care, on the primary outcome of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) over 1 year.

METHODS:

In 2021-2022, intervention-arm dyads completed an acceptability questionnaire developed to test causal assumptions. We conducted qualitative interviews with dyads and intervention facilitators, purposively selected for diverse follow-up GAS scores. We collected observational data from intervention session recordings. We thematically analysed data, then integrated qualitative and quantitative data.

RESULTS:

174/204 (85.3%) dyads allocated to NIDUS-Family, fully completed it, 18 partially completed, while 12 received no intervention. We interviewed 27/192 (14%) of dyads receiving any sessions, and 9/10 facilitators; and observed 12 sessions. 47/192 (24.5%) of carers completed the acceptability questionnaire. We identified four themes (A) 'Someone to talk to helps dyads feel supported'; (B) 'NIDUS-Family helps carers change their perspective'; (C) 'Personalisation helps people living with dementia maintain their identity' and (D) 'Small steps help dyads move forward'.

CONCLUSION:

Key causal pathway mechanisms were a respectful, trusting and impartial relationship with the facilitator supporting the development of meaningful goals and support to find manageable solutions. Core implementation factors were delivery of the modules from a consistent facilitator across regular sessions. Core contextual factors influencing these mechanisms were dyadic participation and understanding of abilities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Demencia / Objetivos Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Age Ageing Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Demencia / Objetivos Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Age Ageing Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article