Live, attenuated, tetravalent Butantan- Dengue vaccine in children and adults

BACKGROUND Butantan–Dengue Vaccine (Butantan-DV) is an investigational, single-dose, live, attenuated, tetravalent vaccine against dengue disease, but data on its overall efficacy are needed. METHODS In an ongoing phase 3, double-blind trial in Brazil, we randomly assigned participants to receive Butantan-DV or placebo, with stratification according to age (2 to 6 years, 7 to 17 years, and 18 to 59 years); 5 years of follow-up is planned. The objectives of the trial were to evaluate overall vaccine efficacy against symptomatic, virologically con firmed dengue of any serotype occurring more than 28 days after vaccination (the primary efficacy end point), regardless of serostatus at baseline, and to describe safety up to day 21 (the primary safety end point). Here, vaccine efficacy was assessed on the basis of 2 years of follow-up for each participant, and safety as solicited vaccine-related adverse events reported up to day 21 after injection. Key secondary objectives were to assess vaccine efficacy among participants according to dengue serostatus at baseline and according to the dengue viral serotype; efficacy according to age was also assessed. RESULTS Over a 3-year enrollment period, 16,235 participants received either Butantan-DV (10,259 participants) or placebo (5976 participants). The overall 2-year vaccine effi cacy was 79.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.0 to 86.3) — 73.6% (95% CI, 57.6 to 83.7) among participants with no evidence of previous dengue exposure and 89.2% (95% CI, 77.6 to 95.6) among those with a history of exposure. Vaccine effi cacy was 80.1% (95% CI, 66.0 to 88.4) among participants 2 to 6 years of age, 77.8% (95% CI, 55.6 to 89.6) among those 7 to 17 years of age, and 90.0% (95% CI, 68.2 to 97.5) among those 18 to 59 years of age. Efficacy against DENV-1 was 89.5% (95% CI, 78.7 to 95.0) and against DENV-2 was 69.6% (95% CI, 50.8 to 81.5). DENV-3 and DENV-4 were not detected during the follow-up period. Solicited systemic vaccine- or placebo-related adverse events within 21 days after injection were more common with Butantan-DV than with placebo (58.3% of participants, vs. 45.6%). CONCLUSIONS A single dose of Butantan-DV prevented symptomatic DENV-1 and DENV-2, regard less of dengue serostatus at baseline, through 2 years of follow-up. (Funded by Instituto Butantan and others; DEN-03-IB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02406729, and WHO ICTRP number, U1111-1168-8679.)

Overview of SARS-COV-2 infection at the butantan penitentiary progression center

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus among individuals living in restricted freedom. METHODS: A seroprevalence survey was carried out with the population of the female penitentiary of the Centro de Progressão Penitenciária (CPP) in Butantan (municipality of São Paulo), between June 24 and August 20, 2020. During this period, according to the Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration (SAP), the positivity of rapid tests among inmates ranged from 65% to 78%. The evaluation method used in the study was the “One Step COVID-19” rapid test (chromatography), from the company Wondfo, also using the RT-PCR method in symptomatic participants to confirm the viral condition. The study population consisted of 879 female inmates and 170 employees of the institution. RESULTS: The prevalence of total antibodies (IgG/IgM) against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the total population of 1049 study participants was 6.1%; among the population of 879 inmates, a prevalence of 5.8% was observed, and among the institution’s employees, 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of covid-19 at the Butantan CPP was low, which is due to the implementation of simple prevention measures at the institution, such as the use of masks (with appropriate changes), emphasis on hygiene, hand washing and social distancing, in addition to other strategies, such as suspending inmates’ visits from relatives and friends and cutting back on elective medical appointments and outside work.

Antibody response dynamics to CoronaVac vaccine and booster immunization in adults and the elderly: a long-term, longitudinal prospective study

Background The long-term humoral immune response after vaccination varies between vaccines and is dependent on the accuracy of the antibody test. A better understanding of the vaccine immune response may help to define vaccination strategies against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective To investigate the long-term immunological response to CoronaVac vaccine and determinants of breakthrough COVID-19 infection. Methods A long-term, prospective cohort study involving vaccinated adult and elderly subjects was conducted to investigate the presence of anti-RBD-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G, anti-nucleocapsid IgG and anti-spike trimeric protein IgG. Antibody level dynamics and risk factors associated with breakthrough COVID-19 infection were investigated. Results In total, 3902 participants were included in this study. Vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac and a booster dose increased the levels of anti-RBD-specific IgG, anti-nucleocapsid IgG and anti-spike trimeric IgG significantly. In adults, anti-nucleocapsid IgG and anti-spike trimeric IgG levels decreased significantly 7 months after the second dose. In adults and the elderly, the levels of anti-spike trimeric IgG and anti-RBD IgG decreased significantly 4 and 6 months after the booster dose, respectively. Previous exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and anti-spike trimeric IgG titres was independently associated with a lower probability of post-vaccination infection. Conclusions A significant increase in antibody levels was found after two doses of CoronaVac and a booster dose. Antibody titres declined significantly 7 months post-vaccination in participants who did not receive a booster dose. Higher levels of antibodies and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with protection against breakthrough COVID-19.

A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial comparing the immunogenicity and safety of two seasonal inactivated influenza vaccines in adults

Background To enhance the production and availability of influenza vaccines in different regions of the world is paramount to mitigate the global burden of this disease. Instituto Butantan developed and manufactured an embryonated egg-based inactivated split-virion trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine as part of a technology transfer partnership with Sanofi Pasteur. Methods This is a phase IV, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter clinical trial including adults 18–60 and > 60 years recruited during the 2019 southern hemisphere influenza season. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either the Sanofi Pasteur Trivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (SP-TIV) or Instituto Butantan Trivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (IB-TIV). Hemagglutinin inhibition antibody titers were assessed pre-vaccination and 21 days post-vaccination. Results 624 participants were randomized and vaccinated. In both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis, non-inferiority of the SP-TIV versus IB-TIV was demonstrated for the three influenza strains. In the per-protocol analysis, the SP-GMT/IB-GMT ratios for H1N1, H3N2, and B were 0.9 (95%CI, 0.7–1.1), 1.2 (95%CI, 1.0–1.4), and 1.1 (95%CI, 0.9–1.3), respectively. Across vaccination groups, the most common adverse reactions (AR) were limited to the injection-site, including pain and tenderness. The majority of the ARs were graded 1 and/or 2 and lasted less than one day. No serious adverse reaction was observed. Conclusion This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of a single-dose of Instituto Butantan versus a single dose of the Sanofi Pasteur Seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in adults. Both vaccines were well tolerated and presented similar safety profiles.

Overview of SARS-COV-2 infection at the Butantan Penitentiary Progression Center / Panorama da infecção pelo SARS-COV-2 no Centro de Progressão Penitenciária do Butantan

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus among individuals living in restricted freedom. METHODS A seroprevalence survey was carried out with the population of the female penitentiary of the Centro de Progressão Penitenciária (CPP) in Butantan (municipality of São Paulo), between June 24 and August 20, 2020. During this period, according to the Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration (SAP), the positivity of rapid tests among inmates ranged from 65% to 78%. The evaluation method used in the study was the "One Step COVID-19" rapid test (chromatography), from the company Wondfo, also using the RT-PCR method in symptomatic participants to confirm the viral condition. The study population consisted of 879 female inmates and 170 employees of the institution. RESULTS The prevalence of total antibodies (IgG/IgM) against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the total population of 1049 study participants was 6.1%; among the population of 879 inmates,a prevalence of 5.8% was observed, and among the institution's employees, 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of covid-19 at the Butantan CPP was low, which is due to the implementation of simple prevention measures at the institution, such as the use of masks (with appropriate changes), emphasis on hygiene, hand washing and social distancing, in addition to other strategies, such as suspending inmates' visits from relatives and friends and cutting back on elective medical appointments and outside work.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Estimar a prevalência da exposição ao vírus SARS-CoV-2 entre indivíduos vivendo em restrição de liberdade. MÉTODOS Foi realizado inquérito de soroprevalência com a população da penitenciária feminina do Centro de Progressão Penitenciária (CPP) do Butantan (município de São Paulo), entre 24 de junho e 20 de agosto de 2020. Nesse período, segundo a Secretaria de Administração Penitenciária (SAP), a positividade dos testes rápidos entre detentos variou de 65 a 78%. O método de avaliação utilizado no estudo foi o teste rápido "One Step COVID-19" (cromatografia), da empresa Wondfo, empregando-se também o método RT-PCR em participantes sintomáticos para confirmação do quadro viral. A população do estudo foi constituída por 879 reeducandas e 170 funcionários da instituição. RESULTADOS A prevalência de anticorpos totais (IgG/IgM) contra o vírus SARS-CoV-2 na população total de 1.049 participantes do estudo foi de 6,1%; entre a população de 879 reeducandas foi observada prevalência de 5,8% e entre os servidores da instituição, 7,5%. CONCLUSÃO Houve baixa prevalência de covid-19 no CPP do Butantan, o que se deve à implementação de medidas de prevenção simples na instituição, como o uso de máscaras (com trocas adequadas), ênfase na higiene, lavagem das mãos e distanciamento social, além de outras estratégias, como suspensão de visitas de familiares e amigos das reeducandas, cortes de consultas médicas eletivas e do trabalho externo.

Dose-sparing effect of two adjuvant formulations with a pandemic influenza A/H7N9 vaccine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial

The emergence of potentially pandemic viruses has resulted in preparedness efforts to develop candidate vaccines and adjuvant formulations. We evaluated the dose-sparing effect and safety of two distinct squalene-based oil-in-water adjuvant emulsion formulations (IB160 and SE) with influenza A/H7N9 antigen. This phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial (NCT03330899), enrolled 432 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 59. Participants were randomly allocated to 8 groups: 1A) IB160 + 15μg H7N9, 1B) IB160 + 7.5μg H7N9, 1C) IB160 + 3.75μg H7N9, 2A) SE + 15μg H7N9, 2B) SE + 7.5μg H7N9, 2C) SE + 3.75μg H7N9, 3) unadjuvanted vaccine 15μg H7N9 and 4) placebo. Immunogenicity was evaluated through haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) tests. Safety was evaluated by monitoring local and systemic, solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AE) and reactions (AR) 7 and 28 days after each study injection, respectively, whereas serious adverse events (SAE) were monitored up to 194 days post-second dose. A greater increase in antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) was observed in groups receiving adjuvanted vaccines. Vaccinees receiving IB160-adjuvanted formulations showed the greatest response in group 1B, which induced an HI GMT increase of 4.7 times, HI titers ≥40 in 45.2% of participants (MN titers ≥40 in 80.8%). Vaccinees receiving SE-adjuvanted vaccines showed the greatest response in group 2A, with an HI GMT increase of 2.5 times, HI titers ≥40 in 22.9% of participants (MN titers ≥40 in 65.7%). Frequencies of AE and AR were similar among groups. Pain at the administration site and headache were the most frequent local and systemic solicited ARs. The vaccine candidates were safe and the adjuvanted formulations have a potential dose-sparing effect on immunogenicity against influenza A/H7N9. The magnitude of this effect could be further explored.

An open-label randomized controlled parallel-group pilot study comparing the immunogenicity of a standard-, double- and booster-dose regimens of the 2014 seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in kidney transplant recipients

Background: Immunogenicity of influenza vaccine in transplant recipients is suboptimal and alternative vaccination regimens are necessary. Methods: We compared the immunogenicity of a standard-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination (SDTIIV), double-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination (DDTIIV) and booster-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination (BDTIIV) of the 2014 seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in kidney transplant recipients. We randomized 176 participants to SDTIIV (59), DDTIIV (59) and BDTIIV regimens (58). Antibody titres were determined by hemagglutination inhibition at enrollment and 21 days post-vaccination. Seroprotection rates (SPR), seroconversion rates (SCR) and geometric mean ratios (GMR) were analyzed separately for participants with low (<1:40) and high (≥1:40) pre-vaccination antibody titres. Results: Vaccination was confirmed for 172 participants. Immunogenicity analysis was done for 149 participants who provided post-vaccination blood samples. In the subgroup with high pre-vaccination antibody titres, all vaccination regimens induced SPR >70% to all antigens, but SCR and GMR were below the recommendations. In the subgroup with low pre-vaccination antibody titres, DDTIIV and BDTIIV regimens induced adequate SCR >40% and GMR >2,5 for all antigens, while SDTIIV achieved the same outcomes only for influenza B. SPR were >70% only after DDTIIV (A/H1N1 - 77.8%) and BDTIIV (A/H3N2 - 77.8%). BDTIIV regimen independently increased seroprotection to A/H1N1 (PR=2.58; p=0.021) and A/H3N2 (PR=2.21; p=0.004), while DDTIIV independently increased seroprotection to A/H1N1 (PR=2.59; p=0.021). Conclusion: Our results suggest that DDTIIV and BDTIIV regimens are more immunogenic than SDTIIV, indicating the need for head-to-head multicenter clinical trials to further evaluate their efficacy.

Active pharmacovigilance of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine produced by Instituto Butantan: a prospective cohort study of five target groups

Active pharmacovigilance studies are pivotal to better characterize vaccine safety. Methods: These are multicenter prospective cohort studies to evaluate the safety of the 2017 and 2018 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) manufactured by Instituto Butantan, by means of active pharmacovigilance practices. Elderly, children, healthcare workers, pregnant women, and women in the puerperium period were invited to participate in the study during the 2017 and 2018 Brazilian national seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. Following immunization, participants were observed for 30 minutes and they received a participant card to register adverse events information. All safety information registered were checked at a clinical site visit 14 days after immunization and by a telephone contact 42 days after immunization for unsolicited Adverse Events (AE) and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). Results: A total of 942 volunteers participated in the two studies: 305 elderly, 109 children, 108 pregnant women, 32 women in the postpartum period, and 388 health workers. Overall, the median number of AR per participant ranged from 1 to 4. The lowest median number of AR per participant was observed among healthcare workers (1 AR per participant) and the highest among pregnant women (4 AR per participant). Overall, local pain (46.6%) was the most frequent solicited local AR. The most frequent systemic ARs were: headache (22.5%) followed by fatigue (16.0%), and malaise (11.0%). The majority of solicited ARs (96%) were mild, Grades 1 or 2), only 3% were Grade 3, and 1% was Grade 4. No serious AEs, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome, were reported up to 42 days postvaccination. Conclusion: The results from the two studies confirmed that the 2017 and 2018 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan were safe and that active pharmacovigilance studies should be considered, when it is feasible, as an important initiative to monitor vaccine safety in the post-marketing period.

COVID-19 in long-term care facilities in Brazil: serological survey in a post-outbreak setting

This cross-sectional seroepidemiological survey presents the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in a population living in 15 Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCFs), after two intra-institutional outbreaks of COVID-19 in the city of Botucatu, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Residents were invited to participate in the serological survey performed in June and July 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical characterization of the participants as well as the LTCF profile were recorded. Blood samples were collected, processed and serum samples were tested using the rapid One Step COVID-19 immunochromatography test to detect IgM and IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2. Among 209 residents, the median of age was 81 years old, 135 (64.6%) were female and 171 (81.8%) self-referred as being white. An overall seroprevalence of 11.5% (95% CI: 7.5% – 16.6%) was found. The highest seroprevalences of 100% and 76.9% were observed in LTCFs that had experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. Most residents with positive immunochromatography tests (70.8%) referred previous contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Although there was a relatively low seroprevalence of COVID-19 in the total number of elderly people, this population is highly vulnerable and LTCFs are environments at higher risk for COVID-19 dissemination. A well-established test for COVID-19 policies, the adequate characterization of the level of interaction between residents and the healthcare provider team and the level of complexity of care are crucial to monitor and control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in these institutions.

Safety assessment of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine produced by Instituto Butantan from 2013 to 2017

Vaccination has been a successful strategy in influenza prevention. However, despite the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, they can cause adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Moreover, due to the vaccination success, most of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) have become rare, and public attention has been shifted from VPD to the AEFI associated with vaccination. This manuscript describes the safety of Instituto Butantan (IB) seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) from 2013 to 2017. AEFI data were received by the Department of Pharmacovigilance of IB (PV-IB), from January the 1st 2013 to December the 31st 2017, and were recorded in an electronic database (OpenClinica (c)). PV-IB received 1,415 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) associated with the TIV; 1,253 ICSR with at least one AEFI were analyzed and 4,140 AEFI were identified. The other 162 (11.4%) cases did not present any symptom. Among the total of AEFI, 405 (9.8%) were classified as serious. AEFI with the highest incidence rates per 100,000 doses of TIV were: "local pain" (0.28), "local erythema" (0.23), "local warmth" (0.22), "local swelling" (0.20) and "fever" (0.19). PV-IB received 175 (4.2%) occurrences of SAE of special interest, of which 75 (1.8%) anaphylaxis/anaphylactic reactions, 56 (1.4%) neurological syndromes (including seven Guillain-Barre Syndrome) and 44 (1.1%) convulsion/febrile convulsion. The results of this manuscript suggested that Instituto Butantan trivalent influenza vaccine (IB-TIV) is safe, as most of the reported AEFI were classified as non-serious. AEFI described for the IB-TIV are in agreement with the ones described in the literature for similar vaccines.

Safety assessment of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine produced by Instituto Butantan from 2013 to 2017

Vaccination has been a successful strategy in influenza prevention. However, despite the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, they can cause adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Moreover, due to the vaccination success, most of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) have become rare, and public attention has been shifted from VPD to the AEFI associated with vaccination. This manuscript describes the safety of Instituto Butantan (IB) seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) from 2013 to 2017. AEFI data were received by the Department of Pharmacovigilance of IB (PV-IB), from January the 1st 2013 to December the 31st 2017, and were recorded in an electronic database (OpenClinica (c)). PV-IB received 1,415 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) associated with the TIV; 1,253 ICSR with at least one AEFI were analyzed and 4,140 AEFI were identified. The other 162 (11.4%) cases did not present any symptom. Among the total of AEFI, 405 (9.8%) were classified as serious. AEFI with the highest incidence rates per 100,000 doses of TIV were: "local pain" (0.28), "local erythema" (0.23), "local warmth" (0.22), "local swelling" (0.20) and "fever" (0.19). PV-IB received 175 (4.2%) occurrences of SAE of special interest, of which 75 (1.8%) anaphylaxis/anaphylactic reactions, 56 (1.4%) neurological syndromes (including seven Guillain-Barre Syndrome) and 44 (1.1%) convulsion/febrile convulsion. The results of this manuscript suggested that Instituto Butantan trivalent influenza vaccine (IB-TIV) is safe, as most of the reported AEFI were classified as non-serious. AEFI described for the IB-TIV are in agreement with the ones described in the literature for similar vaccines.

Prospective cohort studies to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the 2013, 2014, and 2015 seasonal influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan

Annual vaccination is the most effective way to prevent seasonal influenza illness. Instituto Butantan (IB) performed clinical studies with its 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (inactivated split-virion). Prospective cohort studies were carried out to describe the safety and immunogenicity of Instituto Butantan influenza vaccines, in healthy adults and elderly, from 2013 to 2015. Immediately after the informed consent was signed, participants underwent blood collection followed by vaccination. On study days 1, 2 and 3 post-vaccination participants were contacted by the staff to evaluate the occurrence of solicited (local and systemic) and non-solicited adverse reactions. On study day 21 (+7) subjects returned to the clinical site for final safety assessments and blood collection to evaluate post-vaccination immunogenicity. The immunogenicity analyses were performed by means of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. The immunogenicity endpoints were: seroprotection (SPR) and seroconversion (SCR) rates and the geometric mean HI antibody titer ratio (GMTR). The 2013 study was conducted at the Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais (CRIE) and at the Centro de Pesquisa Clínica do Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo while the 2014 and 2015 studies were conducted at CRIE. The vaccine composition followed the WHO recommendation for the Southern hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccine. Forty-seven healthy adults and 13 elderly participated in the 2013 study, 60 healthy adults and 60 elderly in the 2014 study, and 62 healthy adults and 57 elderly in the 2015 study. In the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies, pain was the most frequent local adverse reaction and headache the most frequent systemic adverse reaction. All observed adverse reactions were classified as mild or moderate and none as severe. SPR >70% and SPR >60% were observed in adults and elderly, respectively, for the three vaccine viruses, in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies. SCR >40% was observed in adults, for the three vaccine viruses, only in the 2014 study and SCR >30% was observed in the elderly, for the three vaccine viruses, only in the 2013 and 2014 studies. GMTR >2.5 among adults, for the three vaccine viruses was only observed in the 2013 study and GMTR >2.0 was observed among elderly, for the three vaccine viruses, in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies. The 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasonal influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan were safe and immunogenic according to the immunogenicity criteria defined by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Prospective cohort studies to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the 2013, 2014, and 2015 seasonal influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan

Annual vaccination is the most effective way to prevent seasonal influenza illness. Instituto Butantan (IB) performed clinical studies with its 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (inactivated split-virion). Prospective cohort studies were carried out to describe the safety and immunogenicity of Instituto Butantan influenza vaccines, in healthy adults and elderly, from 2013 to 2015. Immediately after the informed consent was signed, participants underwent blood collection followed by vaccination. On study days 1, 2 and 3 post-vaccination participants were contacted by the staff to evaluate the occurrence of solicited (local and systemic) and non-solicited adverse reactions. On study day 21 (+7) subjects returned to the clinical site for final safety assessments and blood collection to evaluate post-vaccination immunogenicity. The immunogenicity analyses were performed by means of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. The immunogenicity endpoints were: seroprotection (SPR) and seroconversion (SCR) rates and the geometric mean HI antibody titer ratio (GMTR). The 2013 study was conducted at the Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais (CRIE) and at the Centro de Pesquisa Clínica do Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo while the 2014 and 2015 studies were conducted at CRIE. The vaccine composition followed the WHO recommendation for the Southern hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccine. Forty-seven healthy adults and 13 elderly participated in the 2013 study, 60 healthy adults and 60 elderly in the 2014 study, and 62 healthy adults and 57 elderly in the 2015 study. In the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies, pain was the most frequent local adverse reaction and headache the most frequent systemic adverse reaction. All observed adverse reactions were classified as mild or moderate and none as severe. SPR >70% and SPR >60% were observed in adults and elderly, respectively, for the three vaccine viruses, in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies. SCR >40% was observed in adults, for the three vaccine viruses, only in the 2014 study and SCR >30% was observed in the elderly, for the three vaccine viruses, only in the 2013 and 2014 studies. GMTR >2.5 among adults, for the three vaccine viruses was only observed in the 2013 study and GMTR >2.0 was observed among elderly, for the three vaccine viruses, in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies. The 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasonal influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan were safe and immunogenic according to the immunogenicity criteria defined by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Perfil de segurança dos soros heterólogos produzidos pelo Instituto Butantan, São Paulo-SP, no período de 2012 a 2015 / Safety profile of heterologous serum produced by the Butantan Institute, in São Paulo-SP, Brazil, from 2012 to 2015 / Perfil de seguridad de los sueros heterólogos producidos por el Instituto Butantan, São Paulo-SP, Brasil, en el período de 2012 al 2015

Resumo OBJETIVO: descrever o perfil de segurança dos soros heterólogos produzidos pelo Instituto Butantan (IB) de São Paulo-SP, Brasil. MÉTODOS: estudo descritivo dos relatos de eventos adversos (EA) pós-exposição aos soros produzidos pelo IB, codificados pela terminologia do Dicionário Médico para Atividades Regulatórias (MedDRA), notificados espontaneamente ao IB entre 2012 e 2015. RESULTADOS: foram notificados 52 usuários com algum evento adverso relacionado, principalmente, aos soros antibotrópico (n=11), antidiftérico (n=9) e antiofídico não especificado (n=9); observaram-se, em média, 3,2 EA por indivíduo; dos 173 EA notificados, 63,0% eram esperados por serem eventos descritos em bula; os EA mais notificados foram categorizados como afecções dos tecidos cutâneos e subcutâneos (30,6%); houve seis óbitos temporalmente relacionados ao uso de soros, porém essa associação foi descartada. CONCLUSÃO: no período estudado, os soros produzidos pelo IB não apresentaram alteração em seu perfil de segurança, já que os EA relatados eram esperados conforme informação descrita em bula.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: to describe the safety profile of the heterologous serum produced by the Butantan Institute (BI) of São Paulo-SP, Brazil. METHODS: a descriptive study of adverse events (AEs) post-exposure to serum produced by the BI, encoded in the medical terminology of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and spontaneously reported to BI from 2012 to 2015. RESULTS: 52 individuals reported AEs, mainly related to Bothrops antivenom (n=11), diphtheria antitoxin (n=9) and unspecified snakebite serum (n=9); a mean of 3.2 AEs per individual was observed; among the total of 173 AEs, 63.0% were expected considering that they were described in the package insert; most of them were classified as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (30.6%); there were six deaths temporally related to the use of serum, but this association was discarded. CONCLUSION: in the studied period, the serum produced by the BI had no changes in their safety profiles, considering that the AEs were expected, according to the information previously described in the package insert.

Resumen OBJETIVO: describir el perfil de seguridad de los sueros heterólogos producidos por el Instituto Butantan (IB) de São Paulo-SP, Brasil. MÉTODOS: estudio descriptivo de los informes de eventos adversos (EAs) post-exposición a los sueros del IB y codificados según el Diccionario Médico para Actividades Regulatorias (MedDRA). RESULTADOS: 52 usuarios presentaron EAs relacionados con los sueros antibotrópico (n=11), antidiftérico (n=9) y antiofídico no especificado (n=9); se observó, en los EAs, 3,2 de media por persona; de los 173 EAs reportados, 63,0% fueron "esperados", ya que figuran descritos en la bula farmacológica; los EAs más reportados fueron los trastornos de piel y tejido subcutáneo (30,6%); hubo seis muertes, pero se descartó la asociación con el uso de suero. CONCLUSIÓN: durante el período de estudio, los sueros del IB no mostraron ningún cambio en su perfil de seguridad, ya que los EAs reportados eran esperados conforme información descrita en la bula.

Prevalence and titers of yellow fever virus neutralizing antibodies in previously vaccinated adults

ABSTRACT Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends one single dose of the Yellow Fever (YF) vaccine based on studies of antibody persistency in healthy adults. We assessed the prevalence and titers of YF virus neutralizing antibodies in previously vaccinated persons aged ≥ 60 years, in comparison to younger adults. We also evaluated the correlation between antibody titers and the time since vaccination among participants who received one vaccine dose, and the seropositivity among participants vaccinated prior to or within the past 10 years. Methods: previously vaccinated healthy persons aged ≥ 18 years were included. YF virus neutralizing antibody titers were determined by means of the 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. Results: 46 persons aged ≥ 60 years and 48 persons aged 18 to 59 years were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of YF virus neutralizing antibodies between the two groups (p = 0.263). However, titers were significantly lower in the elderly (p = 0.022). There was no correlation between YF virus neutralizing antibody titers and the time since vaccination. There was no significant difference in seropositivity among participants vaccinated prior to or within the past 10 years. Conclusions: the clinical relevance of the observed difference in YF virus neutralizing antibody titers between the two groups is not clear.

Prevalence and titers of yellow fever virus neutralizing antibodies in previously vaccinated adults

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends one single dose of the Yellow Fever (YF) vaccine based on studies of antibody persistency in healthy adults. We assessed the prevalence and titers of YF virus neutralizing antibodies in previously vaccinated persons aged = 60 years, in comparison to younger adults. We also evaluated the correlation between antibody titers and the time since vaccination among participants who received one vaccine dose, and the seropositivity among participants vaccinated prior to or within the past 10 years. Methods previously vaccinated healthy persons aged = 18 years were included. YF virus neutralizing antibody titers were determined by means of the 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. Results: 46 persons aged = 60 years and 48 persons aged 18 to 59 years were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of YF virus neutralizing antibodies between the two groups (p = 0.263). However, titers were significantly lower in the elderly (p = 0.022). There was no correlation between YF virus neutralizing antibody titers and the time since vaccination. There was no significant difference in seropositivity among participants vaccinated prior to or within the past 10 years. Conclusions: the clinical relevance of the observed difference in YF virus neutralizing antibody titers between the two groups is not clear.

Perfil de segurança dos soros heterólogos produzidos pelo Instituto Butantan, São Paulo-SP, no período de 2012 a 2015 / Safety profile of heterologous serum produced by the Butantan Institute, in Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil, from 2012 to 2015

OBJETIVO: descrever o perfil de segurança dos soros heterólogos produzidos pelo Instituto Butantan (IB) de São Paulo-SP, Brasil. MÉTODOS: estudo descritivo dos relatos de eventos adversos (EA) pós-exposição aos soros produzidos pelo IB, codificados pela terminologia do Dicionário Médico para Atividades Regulatórias (MedDRA), notificados espontaneamente ao IB entre 2012 e 2015. RESULTADOS: foram notificados 52 usuários com algum evento adverso relacionado, principalmente, aos soros antibotrópico (n=11), antidiftérico (n=9) e antiofídico não especificado (n=9); observaram-se, em média, 3,2 EA por indivíduo; dos 173 EA notificados, 63,0% eram esperados por serem eventos descritos em bula; os EA mais notificados foram categorizados como afecções dos tecidos cutâneos e subcutâneos (30,6%); houve seis óbitos temporalmente relacionados ao uso de soros, porém essa associação foi descartada. CONCLUSÃO: no período estudado, os soros produzidos pelo IB não apresentaram alteração em seu perfil de segurança, já que os EA relatados eram esperados conforme informação descrita em bula.

Objective: to describe the safety profile of the heterologous serum produced by the Butantan Institute (BI) of Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Methods: a descriptive study of adverse events (AEs) post-exposure to serum produced by the BI, encoded in the medical terminology of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and spontaneously reported to BI from 2012 to 2015. Results: 52 individuals reported AEs, mainly related to Bothrops antivenom (n= 11), diphtheria antitoxin (n= 9) and unspecified snakebite serum (n= 9); a mean of 3.2 AEs per individual was observed; among the total of 173 AEs, 63.0% were expected considering that they were described in the package insert; most of them were classified as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (30.6%); there were six deaths temporally related to the use of serum, but this association was discarded. Conclusion: in the studied period, the serum produced by the BI had no changes in their safety profiles, considering that the AEs were expected, according to the information previously described in the package insert.

Fadiga clínicamente relevante em mulheres com câncer de mama: prevalência e fatores associados / Fatiga clínicamente relevante en las mujeres con cáncer de mama: prevalencia y factores asociados / Clinical Relevant Fatigue in Women with Breast Cancer: Prevalence and Associated Factors

Introdução: A fadiga é um sintoma prevalente em pacientes com câncer. Objetivo: O estudo analisou a prevaléncia e os preditores independentes de fadiga em mulheres com câncer de mama. Material e método: Trata-se de estudo transversal com amostra não probabilistica de 163 pacientes em acompanhamento ambulatorial. Fadiga foi avaliada pela Escala de Fadiga de Piper. Resultados: Fadiga clinicamente relevante (escore > 4) esteve presente em 31,9% da amostra e a intensidade mèdia foi 6,0 (DP = 1,3). Dor e depressão foram fatores independentemente associados à fadiga. Con-clusões: A associação fadiga, dor e depressão confirmou a existéncia de cluster de sintomas. O controle da fadiga è pouco conhecido, mas depressão e dor podem ser tratadas e talvez, proporcionar alivio da fadiga.

Introducción: La fatiga es un sintoma frecuente en pacientes con cáncer. Objetivo: Examinar la prevalencia y los predictores independientes de la fatiga en las mujeres con cáncer de mama. Material e método: Se trata de un estudio transversal con una muestra no probabilistica de 163 pacientes en acompañamiento ambulatorio. La fatiga fue evaluada por la Escala de Fatiga de Piper. Resultados: La fatiga clinicamente relevante (puntuación > 4) estuvo presente en el 31,9% de la muestra y la intensidad media fue de 6 (DP = 1,3). El dolor y la depresión fueron factores independientemente asociados con la fatiga. Conclusiones: La asociación de la fatiga, el dolor y la depresión confirmaron la existencia de clúster de sintomas. El control de la fatiga es poco conocido, pero la depresión y el dolor pueden ser tratados y tal vez proporcionar alivio de la fatiga.

Introduction: Fatigue is a common symptom in patients with cancer. Objective: To examine the prevalence and independent predictors of fatigue in women with breast cancer. Material and Method: A cross-sectional study with a nonrandom sample of 163 patients in outpatient follow-up. Fatigue was assessed by the Piper Fatigue Scale. Results: Clinical relevant fatigue (score > 4) was present in 31.9% of the sample and the average intensity was 6 (SD = 1.3).Pain and depression were factors independently associated with fatigue. Conclusions: The association of fatigue, pain and depression confirmed the existence of cluster of symptoms. The management of fatigue is poorly understood, but depression and pain may be treated and may provide relief from fatigue.