Determinants of success and hemodynamic impact of balloon postdilatation of self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves

OBJECTIVES: To explore the rate, the determinants of success, and the hemodynamic impact of balloon postdilatation (BPD) of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (SE-THVs) Background: BPD is commonly used to optimize valve expansion and reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without clearly knowing its hemodynamic benefits. METHODS: Patients (n 5 307) who received a SE-THV were stratified according to whether a BPD was performed or not. Patients who received BPD were stratified according to the severity of PVL remaining after BPD into two groups: Successful BPD ( mild PVL 1 BPD) and Failed BPD (moderate-severe PVL 1 BPD). RESULTS: BPD was performed in 121 patients (39.4%) and was successful in 106 patients (87.6% of attempts). A ratio of the postdilatation balloon diameter to the annulus diameter 0.95 was an independent predictor of BPD failure (OR: 10.72 [2.02-56.76], P 5 .005). Peak transvalvular pressure gradient (PG) was lower in the Successful BPD group (14[12-22] mm Hg) than in the Failed BPD group (18[16-23] mm Hg, P 5 .029), and did not rise in either group during follow-up (median [IQR], 364[161-739] days). CONCLUSION: BPD was performed in 39% of patients who received a SE-THV, and was successful in the majority of attempts. BPD failure was more likely in patients with a small postdilatation balloon-to-annulus diameter ratio. Effective BPD improved THV hemodynamic performance, and this was maintained in the intermediate-term post-TAVI.

The Role of Quantitative Aortographic Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation by Videodensitometry in the Guidance of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation / Papel da Avaliação Aortográfica Quantitativa da Regurgitação Aórtica por Videodensitometria na Orientação do Implante da Valva Aórtica Transcateter

Abstract Background: Balloon post-dilatation (BPD) is often needed for optimizing transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, since paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with poor outcome and mortality. Quantitative assessment of PVL severity before and after BPD is mandatory to properly assess PVL, thus improving implantation results and outcomes. Objective: To investigate a quantitative angiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) by videodensitometry before and after BPD. Methods: Videodensitometric-AR assessments (VD-AR) before and after BPD were analysed in 61 cases. Results: VD-AR decreased significantly from 24.0[18.0-30.5]% to 12.0[5.5-19.0]% (p < 0.001, a two-tailed p < 0.05 defined the statistical significance). The relative delta of VD-AR after BPD ranged from -100% (improvement) to +40% (deterioration) and its median value was -46.2%. The frequency of improvement, no change, and deterioration were 70% (n = 43), 25% (n = 15) and 5% (n = 3), respectively. Significant AR (VD-AR > 17%) was observed in 47 patients (77%) before and in 19 patients (31%) after BPD. Conclusions: VD-AR after THV implantation provides a quantitative assessment of post-TAVI regurgitation and can help in the decision-making process on performing BPD and in determining its efficacy.

Resumo Fundamento: A pós-dilatação com balão (PDB) é normalmente necessária para otimização do implante da válvula cardíaca transcateter (THV), uma vez que o "escape" ou leak paravalvar (PVL) após implante de valva aórtica transcateter está associada com desfecho ruim e mortalidade. A avaliação quantitativa da gravidade do PVL antes e após a PDB é mandatória para se avaliar adequadamente o PVL e, assim, melhorar os resultados e os desfechos do implante. Objetivo: Investigar uma avalição angiográfica quantitativa da regurgitação aórtica (RA) por videodensitometria (VD-RA) antes e após a PDB. Métodos: Resultados da VD-RA antes e após a PDB foram analisados em 61 casos. Resultados Houve diminuição significativa da VD-RA de 24,0(18,0-30,5)% para 12,0(5,5-19,0)% (p < 0,001; p < 0,05 bilateral foi definido como significância estatística). O delta relativo de VD-RA após a PDB variou de -100% (melhora) a +40% (piora) e o valor mediano foi -46,2%. As frequências de melhora, ausência de mudança, e piora foram 70% (n = 43), 25% (n = 15) e 5% (n = 3), respectivamente. Observou-se RA significativo (VD-RA > 17%) em 47 pacientes (77%) antes e em 19 pacientes (31%) após a PDB. Conclusões: A VD-RA após o implante de THV possibilita a avaliação quantitativa da regurgitação pós-TAVI, e pode auxiliar na tomada de decisão quanto à realização ou não da PDB, bem como na avaliação de sua eficácia.

Angiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation by video-densitometry in the setting of TAVI: echocardiographic and clinical correlates

We sought to investigate a new angiographic method for aortic regurgitation (AR) severity assessment in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). AR after TAVI is common but challenging to quantitate, especially in the cath-lab. In 228 patients, AR was quantitated before and after TAVI by echocardiography and by video-densitometric analysis of aortograms. Contrast time– density curves for the aortic root (the reference region) and the left ventricular outflow tract, LVOT were generated. LVOT-AR was calculated as the area under the curve of the LVOT as a fraction of the area under the curve of the reference region. LVOT-AR was 0.10 6 0.08, 0.13 6 0.10 and 0.28 6 0.14 in none-trace, mild and moderate-severe post-TAVI AR as defined by echocardiography (P 0.17 corresponded to moderate-severe AR on echocardiography (area under the curve 5 0.84). At follow-up (median, 496 days), patients with LVOT-AR 0.17 showed a significant reduction of LV mass index (LVMi; 121 [95–148] vs. 140 [112– 169] g/m2 , P 5 0.009) and the prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LVH; 64 vs. 88%, P 5 0.001) compared to baseline. In patients with LVOT-AR > 0.17, LVMi (149 [121–178] vs. 166 [144–188] g/m2 , P 5 0.14) and the prevalence of LVH (74 vs. 87%, P 5 0.23) did not show a significant change. Compared to patients with LVOT-AR 0.17, those with LVOT-AR > 0.17 had an increased 30-day (16.4% vs. 7.1%, P 5 0.035) and one year mortality (32.9 vs. 14.2%, log rank P value 5 0.001; HR: 2.690 [1.461–4.953], P 5 0.001). LVOT-AR > 0.17 corresponds to greater than mild AR as defined by echocardiography and predicts impaired LV reverse remodeling and increased early and midterm mortality after TAVI.

The interaction of de novo and pre-existing aortic regurgitation after TAVI: insights from a new quantitative aortographic technique

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intermediate-term clinical impact of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a novel quantitative angiographic method taking into account the influence of pre-existing AR.METHODS AND RESULTS:AR after TAVI was quantified in 338 patients (age 82 [78-86] years; 55% male) and the influence on intermediate-term all-cause mortality was evaluated. In 228 aortograms, AR was quantitated using a dedicated videodensitometric method focused in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT-AR). Patients with LVOT-AR >0.17 had a significantly increased all-cause mortality at three years, compared with patients who had LVOT-AR ≤0.17 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-2.86, p=0.032). Taking the influence of pre-existing AR into account, patients with post-procedural LVOT-AR >0.17 and ≤mild pre-existing AR had a significantly increased mortality at two years, compared to patients with LVOT-AR >0.17 and >mild pre-existing AR (HR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.16-5.58, p=0.029). In those with >mild pre-existing AR (n=70), post-TAVI LVOT-AR >0.17 was not associated with increased mortality (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.31-1.91, p=0.578).CONCLUSIONS:AR after TAVI could be quantitated utilising LVOT-AR. The cut-point of >0.17 indicates a significant AR pertaining to increased intermediate-term mortality, especially in those with no significant pre-existing AR...

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for mixed versus pure stenotic aortic valve disease

In addition to patients with pure/predominant aortic stenosis (PAS), real-world transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI) referrals include patients with mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD; severe stenosis+moderate-severe regurgitation). We sought to compare TAVI outcomes in patients with MAVD vs. PAS. Out of 793 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI, 106 (13.4%) had MAVD. Patients with MAVD were younger and had a higher operative risk, a more severe adverse cardiac remodelling, and a worse functional status than patients with PAS. Moderate-severe prosthetic valve regurgitation (PVR) was significantly more frequent in patients with MAVD than in patients with PAS (15.7% vs. 3.6%, p=0.003), even after propensity-score and multivariable adjustments. Moderate-severe PVR was associated with increased one-year mortality in patients with PAS (log-rank p=0.002), but not in patients with MAVD (log-rank p=0.27). Eventually, all-cause and cardiac mortality as well as the functional capacity were similar in the two study groups up to one year. A significant proportion of patients referred for TAVI in a real-world registry has MAVD. Moderate-severe AR at baseline can influence the rate and modify the clinical sequelae of post-TAVI PVR. Eventually, clinical outcomes in patients with MAVD are comparable to those in patients with PAS in the acute and midterm phases, in spite of a baseline higher risk. MAVD should not be considered a contraindication for TAVI.