LANDMARK comparison of early outcomes of newer-generation Myval transcatheter heart valve series with contemporary valves (Sapien and Evolut) in real-world individuals with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an established, guideline-endorsed treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Precise sizing of the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) series with the aortic annulus is facilitated by increasing its diameter in 1•5 mm increments, compared with the usual 3 mm increments in valve size. The LANDMARK trial aimed to show non-inferiority of the Myval THV series compared with the contemporary THVs Sapien Series (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) or Evolut Series (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). METHODS In this prospective, multinational, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial across 31 hospitals in 16 countries (Germany, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, New Zealand, Portugal, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Estonia, and Brazil), 768 participants with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis were randomly assigned (1:1) to the Myval THV or a contemporary THV. Eligibility was primarily decided by the heart team in accordance with 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. As per the criteria of the third Valve Academic Research Consortium, the primary endpoint at 30 days was a composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke, bleeding (types 3 and 4), acute kidney injury (stages 2­4), major vascular complications, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, and conduction system disturbances resulting in a permanent pacemaker implantation. Non-inferiority of the study device was tested in the intention-to-treat population using a non-inferiority margin of 10•44% and assuming an event rate of 26•10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04275726, and EudraCT, 2020-000137-40, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS Between Jan 6, 2021, and Dec 5, 2023, 768 participants with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis were randomly assigned, 384 to the Myval THV and 384 to a contemporary THV. 369 (48%) participants had their sex recorded as female, and 399 (52%) as male. The mean age of participants was 80•0 years (SD 5•7) for those treated with the Myval THV and 80•4 years (5•4) for those treated with a contemporary THV. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were the same in both groups (Myval 2•6% [IQR 1•7­4•0] vs contemporary 2•6% [1•7­4•0]). The primary endpoint showed non-inferiority of the Myval (25%) compared with contemporary THV (27%), with a risk difference of ­2•3% (one-sided upper 95% CI 3•8, pnon-inferiority<0•0001). No significant difference was seen in individual components of the primary composite endpoint. INTERPRETATION In individuals with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis, the Myval THV met its primary endpoint at 30 days.

A Next-Generation Bioresorbable CoronaryScaffold System: From Bench toFirst Clinical Evaluation

This study sought to perform clinical and imaging assessments of the DESolveBioresorbable Coronary Scaffold (BCS).Background BCS, which is drug eluting, may have potential advantages compared with conventionalmetallic drug-eluting stents. The DESolve system, designed to provide vessel support and neointimalsuppression, combines a poly-L-lactic acid–based scaffold with the antiproliferative myolimus.Methods The DESolve First-in-Man (A NON-RANDOMIZED, CONSECUTIVE ENROLLMENT EVALUATIONOF THE DESolve MYOLIMUS ELUTING BIORESORBABLE CORONARY STENT IN THE TREATMENT OFPATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS) trial was a prospective multicenterstudy enrolling 16 patients eligible for treatment. The principal safety endpoint was a composite ofcardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Theprincipal imaging endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) assessed by quantitative coronaryangiography (QCA) at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography(OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6 months; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) wasperformed at 12 months.Results Acute procedural success was achieved in 15 of 15 patients receiving a study scaffold. At12 months, there was no scaffold thrombosis and no major adverse cardiac events directly attributableto the scaffold. At 6 months, in-scaffold LLL (by QCA) was 0.19 0.19 mm; neointimal volume (by IVUS)was 7.19 3.56%, with no evidence of scaffold recoil or late malapposition. Findings were confirmedwith OCT and showed uniform, thin neointimal coverage (0.12 0.04 mm). At 12 months, MSCTdemonstrated excellent vessel patency.

IMPACT trial: angiographic and intravascular ultrasound observations of the first human experience with mycophenolic acid-eluting polymer stent system

The purpose of the study was to examine the safety and efficacy of two different formulations of mycophenolic acid (MPA)-eluting Duraflex stents on coronary de novo lesions. Recent data indicate that local delivery of MPA in the porcine overstretch coronary

model significantly reduces neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). Patients were divided into three consecutive groups. The first (n 5 50) and second (n 5 55) groups received moderate- and slow-release MPA-eluting Duraflex stent, respectively. The last group (n 5 50) received the bare metal Duraflex stent. Clinical, angiographic, and intravascular

ultrasound analysis were performed at 6-month follow-up. All stents were successfully deployed and patients were discharged home without clinical events. Compared to controls, 6-month in-lesion and in-stent minimum luminal diameter as well as late

lumen loss were not significantly different in the moderate- and slow-release treatment groups. At follow-up, percentage obstruction and NIH volume were also similar between the three groups. At 30 days and 6 and 12 months, there were no differences

noted between the three groups with respect to major adverse cardiac events as well as the individual rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization.

There were no cases of subacute or late thrombosis. In this feasibility trial, the MPAeluting Duraflex stents in either slow- or moderate-release formulations were well tolerated, but showed no benefit for treatment of coronary lesions when compared to

controls. Further testing with different drug dosing or delivery rate might improve these results.