Relation between bioresorbable scaffold sizing using QCA-Dmax and clinical outcomes at 1 year in 1,232 patients from 3 study cohorts (ABSORB Cohort B, ABSORB EXTEND, and ABSORB II)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
; 8(13): 1715-1726, 2015.
Article
em En
| SES-SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, SES-SP
| ID: biblio-1064022
Biblioteca responsável:
BR79.1
Localização: BR79.1
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Assessment of pre-procedural Dmax of proximal and distal sites has been used for Absorb scaffold size selection in the ABSORB studies.METHODS:
A total of 1,248 patients received Absorb scaffolds in the ABSORB Cohort B (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort B) study (N = 101), ABSORB EXTEND (ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation) study (N = 812), and ABSORB II (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial) trial (N = 335). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction [MI], and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was analyzed according to the Dmax subclassification of scaffold oversize group versus scaffold nonoversize group...
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados:
CONASS
/
SES-SP
Assunto principal:
Stents
/
Stents Farmacológicos
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Etiology_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Article