Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures
Fleury, Anna Maria; Silva, Antonio Carlos da; Pochini, Alberto; Ejnisman, Benno; Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de; Andrade, Marilia dos Santos.
Afiliação
  • Fleury, Anna Maria; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Fisiologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Silva, Antonio Carlos da; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Fisiologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Pochini, Alberto; Universidade Federal de Saio Paulo. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Ejnisman, Benno; Universidade Federal de Saio Paulo. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Lira, Claudio Andre Barbosa de; Universidade Federal de Goias. Unidade Jatobá. Jataí. BR
  • Andrade, Marilia dos Santos; Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Departamento de Fisiologia. São Paulo. BR
Clinics ; Clinics;66(2): 313-320, 2011. graf, tab
Article em En | LILACS | ID: lil-581520
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture.

METHODS:

We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured.

RESULTS:

Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20 percent) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60 percent and 57.80 percent and non-surgical, 62.06 percent and 54.06 percent, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27 percent; non-surgical, 98.61 percent).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Músculos Peitorais / Articulação do Ombro / Força Muscular Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clinics Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Músculos Peitorais / Articulação do Ombro / Força Muscular Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clinics Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil