Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(7): 1301-1309, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334938

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Survival of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with sarcoma is lower than in younger patients. The objective of this study was to describe the regional healthcare circuits, the differences in the management between adult, paediatric and mixed units and to assess the prognostic impact of compliance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on overall survival (OS) and on relapse free survival (RFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the management and long term follow-up of all 13-25 year old patients with a sarcoma diagnosed in the Rhône-Alpes area between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS: 140 patients satisfied inclusion criteria and were selected. The majority of 13-25 year old patients were treated in paediatric units. Joint management resulted in a higher rate of discussion in multidisciplinary tumour board, inclusion in clinical trials, and fertility preservation. Non-compliance with guidelines was observed in 65% of cases. Overall compliance was not reported to correlate to survival. Compliance of radiotherapy with CPG's seemed associated with a better prognosis for OS (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = [0.10-0.40]; p < 0.0001) and RFS (HR = 0.18, 95% CI = [0.09-0.37; p < 0.0001) as well as compliance of surgery for OS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI = [0.23-0.81]; p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed other independent predictors of OS like age at diagnosis, stage and histological subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Management of AYA in joint units seems to improve the quality of care. Compliance of surgery and radiotherapy with CGP's seems to improve survival.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radioterapia/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 104(3): 381-389, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31790743

RESUMEN

Recently, molecular assays have been demonstrated to be reliable for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) directly from positive blood cultures, reducing significantly the time for identification. Few studies have tested their performance on rectal swabs and no comprehensive conclusions have been reached regarding their utility for infection control management. Our aim was to review and assess the overall diagnostic test accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for the detection of CPE in rectal swabs. The electronic database PubMed was searched, up to October 1st, 2019, without language restriction or publication date restrictions. First, the concepts of the research questions were defined: 'carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae', 'molecular testing', 'test detection', and 'rectal screening'. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the QUADAS-2 instrument. Statistical analyses were carried out in Stata software using the bivariate model. In all, 143 articles were screened and 16 studies were included. Five (31%) of the studies were conducted in the context of a CPE outbreak; one study (6%) included patients pre-identified with CPE in clinical samples (blood or tracheal secretions), whereas the rest (63%) collected rectal swabs from patients considered at high risk of colonization. The molecular assays evaluated had a relatively good sensitivity of 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.902-0.989), and an excellent specificity of 0.994 (95% CI: 0.965-1). Molecular techniques seem to be a useful, accurate diagnostic tool in screening for carriage of CPE in contact patients around a fortuitous discovery of a non-isolated hospitalized carrier patient.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Recto/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Factores de Tiempo
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 102(3): 245-255, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500389

RESUMEN

Systematic cultures of drain tips or drainage fluids for the early detection of surgical site infections (SSIs) are controversial. To examine the association between the results of systematic drain tip or drainage fluid cultures and the occurrence of SSIs in clean or clean-contaminated surgery. Searches were performed in the PubMed, and Cat.inist databases for observational studies published before 31st March 2017. Studies reporting results of drain tip or drainage fluid systematic cultures and SSIs after clean or clean-contaminated surgeries were included, and meta-analyses were performed. Seventeen studies, including 4390 patients for drain tip cultures and 1288 for drainage fluid cultures, were selected. The pooled negative predictive values were high (99%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 98-100 for drain tip cultures and 98%, 95% CI 94-100 for drainage fluid cultures). The positive predictive values were low (11%, 95% CI 2-24 for drain tip cultures and 12%, 95% CI 3-24 for drainage fluid cultures). The sensitivities were low (41%, 95% CI 12-73 for drain tip cultures and 37%, 95% CI 16-60 for drainage fluid cultures). The specificities were high (93%, 95% CI 88-96) for drain tip cultures and moderate (77%, 95% CI 54-94) for drainage fluid cultures. Systematic cultures of drain tips or drainage fluids appear not to be relevant, because their positive predictive values were low in the prediction of SSIs.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Catéteres/microbiología , Drenaje , Exudados y Transudados/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 101(2): 196-209, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 1990, several studies have focused on safety and patient satisfaction in connection with day surgery. However, to date, no meta-analysis has investigated the overall prevalence of surgical site infections (SSI). AIM: To estimate the overall prevalence of SSI following day surgery, regardless of the type of surgery. METHOD: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the prevalence of SSI following day surgery, regardless of the type of surgery, was conducted, seeking all studies before June 2016. A pooled random effects model using the DerSimonian and Laird approach was used to estimate overall prevalence. A double arcsine transformation was used to stabilize the variance of proportions. After performing a sensitivity analysis to validate the robustness of the method, univariate and multi-variate meta-regressions were used to test the effect of date of publication, country of study, study population, type of specialty, contamination class, time of postoperative patient visit after day surgery, and duration of hospital care. FINDINGS: Ninety articles, both observational and randomized, were analysed. The estimated overall prevalence of SSI among patients who underwent day surgery was 1.36% (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.6), with a Bayesian probability between 1 and 2% of 96.5%. The date of publication was associated with the prevalence of SSI (coefficient -0.001, P = 0.04), and the specialty (digestive vs non-digestive surgery) tended to be associated with the prevalence of SSI (coefficient 0.03, P = 0.064). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis showed a low prevalence of SSI following day surgery, regardless of the surgical procedure.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Teorema de Bayes , Humanos , Prevalencia
5.
Diabetes Metab ; 42(2): 88-95, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385557

RESUMEN

AIM: Type A personality, although classically known as a factor linked to increased vascular risk, has recently been associated with increased survival in patients with diabetes. As low-grade inflammation predicts a poor outcome, the present study explored the potential associations between Type A and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in diabetes. METHODS: Type A personality was assessed by the Bortner questionnaire in people with diabetes. The association between Type A and plasma CRP levels was examined by multivariable linear regression, and structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed to determine the impact of the major clinical, biological and psychological confounders. RESULTS: The study included 626 participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes from the Diabetes and Psychological Profile study. Multivariable analyses showed an independent inverse association between Type A score and CRP levels. The structural model adjusted for age, gender, diabetes type and duration, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol abuse, oral antidiabetic and statin treatments, HbA1c levels, lipids, perceived stress, anxiety and depression revealed significant associations between CRP and Type A (ß=-0.135, 95% CI: -0.242, -0.028; P=0.014), BMI (ß=0.194, 95% CI: 0.038, 0.350; P=0.015) and HDL cholesterol (ß=-0.132, 95% CI: -0.245, -0.020; P=0.014). CONCLUSION: Our present study data indicate that Type A personality is independently associated with lower CRP levels. This lower level of inflammation might explain the better clinical outcomes associated with Type A personality in patients with diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Personalidad Tipo A , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada , Humanos , Inflamación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
Prog Urol ; 24(9): 545-50, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24975788

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The surgical site infections (SSI) are rare adverse events that may have severe consequences in terms of morbidity, mortality and costs. Guidelines on the preparation of the patient can reduce the risk of SSI. Previous guidelines were published in 2004. MATERIAL: A steering committee and a group of experts were established after seeking professional societies that had participated in the previous guidelines. The working group has defined the objectives of revising and retained two main themes: skin preparation and nasal decolonization of patients with Staphylococcus aureus. We chose to report only the work done on the patient skin preparation. The working group relied on the method of recommendation for clinical practice of the High Authority for Health (HAS). The GRADE approach was used to analyze the articles published since 2004. RESULTS: It is recommended to perform a preoperative shower but when does not matter. The use of a simple soap seems sufficient. Shampoo does not seem essential nor removal of varnish in the field of urology. Impregnated fabrics, adhesives fields and bacteriological insulating films are of little use to reduce the risk of infection. The depilation is not routinely required. It is recommended to perform a cleansing on contaminated skin. The use of an alcohol antiseptic is preferred, the successive application of two different antiseptics range is possible. CONCLUSIONS: The updated guidelines on the patient skin preparation before urological surgery was necessary. It changed some guidelines that should appear in our daily practice.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Gestión de Riesgos/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Humanos
7.
Br J Surg ; 97(11): 1603-13, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20878943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of intraoperative povidone-iodine (PVI) application in the reduction of surgical-site infection (SSI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of intraoperative PVI application compared with no antiseptic solution (saline or nothing) on the SSI rate. METHODS: The meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that compared intraoperative PVI lavage with no PVI in patients undergoing surgery with SSI as the primary outcome. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, and heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochran Q and the I(2) value. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials totalling 5004 patients (2465 patients with PVI and 2539 patients without) were included: 15 in the main analysis and nine in the sensitivity analysis. The rate of SSI was 8.0 per cent in the PVI group and 13.4 per cent in the control group. Intraoperative PVI application significantly decreased the SSI rate (relative risk 0.58, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.40 to 0.83; P = 0.003) and consistent results were observed in subgroup analyses according to the method of PVI administration, its timing and the type of surgery. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis results suggested that the use of intraoperative PVI reduced rates of SSI.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA