Analysis of bronchiectasis patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in a tertiary thoracic surgery center: Ten years of experience.

Background: This study aimed to analyze our video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) experience in the surgical treatment of bronchiectasis and the reasons limiting VATS application. Methods: Two hundred one patients (106 males, 95 females; mean age: 39.7±14.1 years; range, 12 to 68 years) who underwent surgical treatment for bronchiectasis between January 2012 and October 2021 were included in the retrospective study. Three groups were created based on the surgical technique used: VATS, thoracotomy, and patients who were converted from VATS to thoracotomy. Results: The most significant presenting symptoms were cough (43%) and excessive sputum expectoration (40%). Surgical intervention was applied to the left side of 60% of the patients, and the most common resection performed in all three groups was left lower lobectomy. The rate of conversion from VATS to thoracotomy was 28.8%, and it was found that dense pleural adhesions were the most common reason. Revision surgery was performed on a total of 11 (5.47%) patients. The frequency of revision surgery did not differ significantly among the three groups (p=0.943). The most common postoperative complication was prolonged air leakage. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complication rates among the groups (p=0.417). The rate of surgical treatment of bronchiectasis with VATS was observed to have increased from 11.1% to 77.7% in our clinic. Conclusion: In experienced hands, VATS can be safely applied in the surgical treatment of bronchiectasis.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elective Hip Surgery.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and lumbar erector spinae plane (L-ESP) blocks, both administered with a high volume (40 mL) of local anesthetic (LA), for multimodal postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hip surgery. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized study that included 75 adult patients who were divided into three equal groups: control, PENG, and L-ESP. The study compared pain intensity, morphine consumption, time to first morphine request, and postoperative satisfaction between the control group, which received standard multimodal analgesia, and the block groups, which received PENG or L-ESP block in addition to multimodal analgesia. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to measure pain intensity. Results: The results showed that the block groups had lower pain intensity scores and morphine consumption, a longer time to the first morphine request, and higher postoperative satisfaction compared to the control group. The median maximum NRS score during the first 12 h was four in the control group, two in the PENG group, and three in the L-ESP group. The control group (21.52 ± 9.63 mg) consumed more morphine than the two block groups (PENG, 11.20 ± 7.55 mg; L-ESP, 12.88 ± 8.87 mg) and requested morphine 6.8 h earlier and 5 h earlier than the PENG and L-ESP groups, respectively. The control group (median 3) had the lowest Likert satisfaction scores, while the PENG group (median 4) had the lowest NRS scores (L-ESP, median 4). Conclusions: The application of PENG or L-ESP blocks with high-volume LA in patients undergoing hip surgery reduces the need for postoperative analgesia and improves the quality of multimodal analgesia.

The effect of body mass index on thoracic paravertebral block analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; a prospective interventional study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of body mass index (BMI) on intensity postoperative pain in patients who underwent thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for postoperative analgesia after video-assissted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: Patients aged 18-80 years, ASA I-III, and BMI 18-40 kg/m2 who underwent elective VATS were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to their BMI levels. TPVB was performed under ultrasound-guidance at the fifth thoracic vertebrae, and 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. The patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed by using morphine and multimodal analgesia was performed. As a rescue analgesic agent, 0.5 mg/kg tramadol was given to patients intravenously when a score of visual analog scale (VAS) at rest was ≥ 4. The primary outcome was determined as VAS scores at rest and cough. Secondary outcomes were determined as postoperative morphine consumption, additional analgesic requirement, and side effects. RESULTS: The post-hoc test revealed that the VAS resting scores at the 4th hour (p: 0.007), 12th hour (p: 0.014), and 48th hour (p: 0.002) were statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II. Additionally, VAS resting scores were also statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group III at all time points (p < 0.05). Similarly, the post-hoc test indicated that the VAS coughing scores at the 4th hour (p: 0.023), 12th hour (p: 0.011), and 48th hour (p: 0.019) were statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II. Moreover, VAS coughing scores were statistically significantly lower in Group I compared to Group III at all time points (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in terms of additional analgesic use between the groups (p: 0.001). Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of morphine consumption via PCA and morphine milligram equivalent consumption between the groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher postoperative VAS scores with TPVB applied in obese patients and the consequent increase in additional analgesics and complications require more specific postoperative management in this patient group.

Comparison of the effects of one-level and bi-level pre-incisional erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of One-Level pre-incisional erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Bi-Level pre-incisional ESPB in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS: This pilot trial was conducted between April 2022 and February 2023 with sixty patients. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In One-Level ESPB Group (n = 30) block was performed at the thoracal(T)5 level with the 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. In the Bi-Level ESPB Group (n = 30) block was performed at T4 and T6 levels by using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for each level. In the postoperative period, 50 mg dexketoprofen every 12 h and 1 g paracetamol every 8 h were given intravenously (IV). Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) prepared with morphine was applied to the patients. 0.5 mg/kg of tramadol was administered via IV for rescue analgesia. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded in the postoperative 1st, 2nd, 4th, 12th, 24th, and 48th -hours. The need for additional analgesics and side effects were recorded. In two groups, patients' demographics and postoperative hemodynamic data were recorded. RESULTS: VAS scores at resting were statistically significantly higher at the 1st (p: 0.002) and 4th -hour (p: 0.001) in the One-Level ESPB. When the groups were evaluated in terms of VAS coughing scores, the 4th -hour (p: 0.001) VAS coughing scores results were found to be statistically significantly higher in the One-Level ESPB group. In terms of VAS values evaluated during follow-up, the rates of VAS coughing score > 3 values were found to be statistically significantly lower in the Bi-Level ESPB group (p: 0.011). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of side effects, morphine consumption, and additional analgesic use (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate analgesia was achieved in the early postoperative period in the group treated with Bi-Level ESPB with similar morphine consumption and side effects. This may be an advantage, especially in the early postoperative period when the pain is quite intense.

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of different local anesthetic volumes for erector spinae plane block in thoracotomy patients; a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a thoracic wall block that has been used frequently in recent years. It was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in different volumes for ESPB in patients undergoing thoracotomy. METHODS: Patients who were in the age range of 18 to 65 years, ASA I-III, had a body mass index (BMI) of 18-30 kg/m2 and were undergoing thoracotomy were included in the study. Patients were assigned to ESPB with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Group-1) or ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Group-2) groups according to the analgesia protocol. In the postoperative care unit, intravenous morphine was administered via a patient-controlled analgesia pump for 24 h. A paracetamol dose of 1 g every 8 h and a dexketoprofen dose of 50 mg twice daily were administered iv for multimodal analgesia. RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) resting scores, the 1st (p = 0.001), 2nd (< 0.001), 4th (< 0.001), 8th (< 0.001), 16th (< 0.010), 24th (< 0.044), and 48th (< 0.005)-hour VAS resting results were found to be statistically significantly higher in the 20 ml group than the 30 ml group. VAS cough scores were statistically significantly higher in the 20 ml group at the 1st (< 0.003), 2nd (< 0.001), 4th (< 0.001), 8th (< 0.001), 16th (< 0.004), 24th (< 0.031), and 48th (< 0.009)-hour. Morphine consumption, and additional analgesic use were found to be statistically significantly higher in the 20 ml group than in the 30 ml group (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of side effects (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of ESPB applied with 20 ml and 30 ml of local anesthetic before the surgical incision in thoracotomy patients showed that the use of 30 ml of local anesthetic provided more effective analgesia. In addition, similar side-effect rates show that 30 ml of local anesthetic can be used safely.

Comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block, thoracic paravertebral block, and erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combination for acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and ESPB and TPVB combination on acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: Seventy-five patients were evaluated (three groups: ESPB, TPVB, or combined ESPB-TPVB [comb-group], each 25 patients). All interventions were performed with the same volume of bupivacaine (20 mL). Primary outcome was VAS (Visual Analog Scale) during the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morphine consumption and rescue analgesic requirements. RESULTS: VAS during rest and coughing of TPVB was significantly higher compared to other groups (in all measurements compared to comb-group; and in all but 24 hours measurement to ESPB) ESPB and comb-group had similar VAS in all measurements (e.g., median VAS in ESPB, TPVB and comb-group at 8th hour: 3-4-2 [P=0.014] during coughing and 2-3-1 in rest [P<0.001], respectively). Morphine consumption was statistically significantly higher in TPVB than comb-group (ESPB: 15.28 mg; TPVB: 19.30 mg; ESPB+TPVB: 10.00 mg) (P=0.003). Rescue analgesic requirement was statistically significantly higher in the TPVB group than comb-group (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: ESPB alone and the combination of ESPB and TPVB provided superior primary outcomes compared to TPVB alone. Morphine and rescue analgesic consumptions were higher in TPVB than comb-group. ESPB and comb-group were statistically similar in terms of primary and secondary outcomes. This study is one of the first studies using the combination of ESBP and TPVB for pain after VATS, and shows the efficacy of this approach.

The effectiveness of ARISCAT Risk Index, other scoring systems, and parameters in predicting pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery.

The Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) risk index, which is frequently used in nonthoracic surgery, may not be sufficient to predict postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the ARISCAT risk index, ASA, preoperative albumin level, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and other parameters in predicting PPCs after thoracic surgery. Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with 1-lung ventilation (OLV) were prospectively analyzed. Demographic data, ARISCAT score, ASA, Nutritional Risk Score-2002, NLR, white blood cell counts, albumin, hemoglobin levels, intraoperative complications, postoperative average visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain at the 24th-hour, the length of stay in the postoperative intensive care unit, chest tube removal time, postoperative complications, and discharge time were recorded. Patients were assessed for morbidity and mortality on the 90th-day. 120 patients' data were analyzed. PPCs developed in 26 patients. The development of PPCs was statistically significant in patients with high ARISCAT scores (P = .002), high ARISCAT grades (P = .009), and ASA III (P = .002). The albumin level was statistically significantly lower in patients who had mortality within 3 months (P = .007). When scoring systems and laboratory parameters were evaluated together, patients with high ARISCAT grade, Albumin < 35g/L, and ASA III had significantly higher development of PPCs (P = .004). ARISCAT risk index and ASA were found to be significant in predicting PPCs after thoracic surgery. They were also valuable when evaluated in combination with preoperative albumin levels. Additionally; age, male gender, duration of surgery, and duration of OLV were also found to be associated with PPCs.

Is there a correlation between preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios and postoperative pain in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery?

ABSTRACT: Many thoracic surgery procedures are now performed with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Postoperative pain is a common condition in patients undergoing VATS. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) are effective in evaluating postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS.This prospective observational study was performed between March 2021 and September 2021 at a tertiary thoracic surgery center. The study included patients who had undergone elective VATS. Preoperative and postoperative NLR, PLR, LMR, hemogram values and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded.A total of 105 patients were analyzed. A positive correlation was observed between postoperative monocyte, neutrophils and VAS resting and VAS cough levels in the early postoperative period. No significant correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative NLR, PLR, and LMR values and VAS rest and VAS cough values. When compared to the preoperative period, a negative correlation was found between the change in the postoperative LMR value and the VAS rest and VAS cough values in the early postoperative period.When compared to the preoperative period, the change in postoperative neutrophil, postoperative monocytes, and postoperative LMR values in patients undergoing VATS in thoracic surgery can be used as a guide in the objective evaluation of postoperative acute pain. It is the belief of the researchers that comprehensive new studies on this subject will contribute significantly to the determination of objective criteria in postoperative pain evaluation.

Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under combination of erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block.

BACKGROUND: The use of anesthetics and analgesic drugs and techniques in combination yields a multimodal effect with increased efficiency. In this case series, we aimed to evaluate the anesthetic effect of the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) combination in patients, who underwent non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NIVATS). METHODS: Medical records of 16 patients, who underwent NIVATS for wedge resection under the combination of ESPB and TPVB were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data of patients, duration of the sensory block, amount of the anesthetic agent used for premedication and sedo-analgesia, any presence of perioperative cough, operative times, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the postoperative follow-up period, the need for additional analgesia, and patient satisfaction were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the patients included in the study, 12 were men and 4 were women. The mean age was 48.6 years and the mean BMI was 24.7 kg/m2. The mean time needed for the achievement of the sensorial block was 14 min and the mean skin-to-skin operative time was 21.4 min. During the procedure, patients received 81.5 ± 27.7 mg of propofol and 30 ± 13.6 micrograms of remifentanil infusions, respectively. The mean dose of ketamine administered in total was 58.1 ± 12.2 mg. Only 2 patients needed an extra dose of remifentanil because of recurrent cough. No patients developed postoperative nausea vomiting. During the first 24 h, the VAS static scores of the patients were 3 and below, while VAS dynamic scores were 4 and below. Morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h was 13.2 mg. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, combined ESPB and TPVB with added intravenous sedo-analgesia in the presence of good cooperation between the surgical team and the anesthesiologist in the perioperative period can provide optimal surgical conditions including the prevention of cough in NIVATS. It is not sufficient to state that this combination is superior to alone ESPB or alone TPVB, as it is a preliminary study with a limited number of cases.

The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combined Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Acute Pain After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and a combination of the deep and superficial serratus anterior plane block (C-SAPB) methods in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study. SETTING: At a single-center, high-volume, tertiary thoracic surgery center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing VATS. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided ESPB and C-SAPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assigned to ESPB (group 1) or C-SAPB (group 2) groups according to the analgesia protocol. All interventions were performed with single-needle insertion. Multimodal analgesia was achieved via paracetamol, dexketoprofen, and intravenous morphine for both study groups. Pain scores were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). Morphine consumption, rescue analgesic requirements, and side effects were recorded postoperatively for 24 hours. The primary outcome was determined as VAS scores at rest and coughing. The secondary outcomes of this study were postoperative morphine consumption and the requirement of rescue analgesics. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VAS scores (p > 0.05). The groups also were similar in terms of demographic characteristics, side effects, morphine consumption, additional analgesic use, and duration of block procedures (p > 0.05). There also were comparable results in terms of hemodynamic variables (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent VATS receiving ESPB or C-SAPB had similar pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects during the first postoperative 24 hours. At the same time, the fact that the duration of the block procedure was similar in both groups showed that multisite serratus anterior plane block can be an effective alternative method in analgesic treatment after VATS, considering that it easily can be applied. The authors here think that C-SAPB can be a good alternative to ESPB because the outcomes of both applications are similar, and C-SAPB easily can be seen and applied with ultrasound.

The Incidence of Itching in Thoracic Epidural Morphine Applications: Can Laboratory Parameters Be Effective in Predicting Itching?

Background Epidural morphine, a powerful analgesic, also causes significant itching in patients. This study aimed to determine the incidence of thoracic epidural morphine-induced pruritus (EMIP) after thoracotomy and to investigate preoperative laboratory parameters for predicting itching in patients who received thoracic epidural morphine (TEM). Methods The patients were divided into two groups. The itching (+) group consists of patients who developed itching (n=31). The no-itching (-) / control group (n=31) was selected among patients who did not develop itching after TEM. Preoperative hemogram values, neutrophil/lymphocyte rate (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte rate (PLR), lymphocyte/monocytes rate (LMR), preoperative and postoperative alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase values, and whether there was itching in the first 48 hours after surgery were determined. Results The incidence of thoracic EMIP after thoracotomy was 7.9%. While preoperative and postoperative ALP was found to be lower in patients with itching compared to those without itching. The cut-off value for preoperative/postoperative ALP was 84.5/53. Decreased white blood cell (WBC) could predict pruritus with a borderline statistical significance. Conclusions The incidence of EMIP after thoracotomy was lower compared to other literature data. Infusion of morphine only into the epidural area may cause a low incidence of EMIP. Laboratory parameters ALP and WBC can predict EMIP, but other hemogram parameters, NLR, LMR, and PLR cannot predict EMIP.

Parameters Affecting Nausea and Vomiting After Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection in Patients With Pneumothorax.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the complications that can occur frequently in the first 24 hours postoperatively. We aimed to investigate the parameters that could predict PONV in patients who underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection for pneumothorax. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee (ID: 2012-KEAK-15/2358, Date: 14.09.2021), the records of patients who underwent elective video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) between January 2018 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients who underwent elective thoracoscopic wedge resection for pneumothorax, who were between the ages of 18-65, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III, and whose body mass index (BMI) was between 18-30 kg/m2 were included in the study. However, patients who received a blood transfusion or used antiemetics, anticholinergic drugs, and analgesics continuously were not included. In addition, patients with a history of chronic pain were not included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, the PONV group (Group 1) and the control group (Group 2). The PONV incidence, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, 24-hour morphine consumption, additional analgesic requirement, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratios (PLR) were evaluated. RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of demographic data (p > 0.05). Additional analgesic requirement and 24-hour morphine consumption were significantly higher in the PONV group (p: 0.005, p < 0.001, respectively). Preoperative NLR (p < 0.001), postoperative NLR (p < 0.001), preoperative PLR (p < 0.022), the VAS scores of the first hour (p: 0.004), and 24th hour (p < 0.001) were statistically significantly higher in the PONV group compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: NLR parameters can be effective with high sensitivity and specificity in predicting PONV during the preoperative and postoperative period. Besides, preoperative PLR may also be effective in predicting PONV. A treatment that can be planned according to these parameters may play a key role in preventing PONV. In addition, efficient perioperative analgesia management may be effective in reducing PONV by limiting the emetogenic analgesics.

Is there a relationship between body mass index and postoperative pain scores in thoracotomy patients with thoracic epidural analgesia?

ABSTRACT: Postoperative efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) following thoracic surgery may vary in patients with different body mass index (BMI) values, regardless of the success of the method. This study aimed to investigate the effects of BMI on postoperative pain scores in patients who underwent thoracotomy with TEA.After obtaining the ethical committee approval (Date: May 11, 2021, Number: 2012-KEAK-15/2305) the data of 1326 patients, who underwent elective thoracic surgery in high volume tertiary thoracic surgery center between January 2017 and January 2021, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients between the age of 18 and 80 years, who underwent thoracotomy and thoracic epidural catheterization (TEC), and who were assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III physical status were included to the study. Of the 406 patients, who underwent a successful TEC, 378 received postoperative analgesia for 72 hours. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores of these patients were evaluated statistically. Based on BMI, patients were categorized into the following 5 groups: Group I: BMI < 20 kg/m2, Group II: BMI = 20 to 24.9 kg/m2, Group III: BMI = 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, Group IV: BMI = 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, and Group V: BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2.There were no statistically significant differences in TEC success across different BMI groups (P > .05). Catheter problems and VAS scores significantly increased with higher BMI values in the postoperative 72-hours period (P < .05). Rates of rescue analgesic use were higher in BMI groups of 30 toto 34.9 kg/m2 and ≥35 kg/m2 compared to the other BMI groups.This study revealed that higher BMI in patients may increase VAS scores, who administered TEA for pain management following thoracotomy. This correlation was supported by the increased need for additional analgesics in patients with high BMI. Therefore, patients with high BMI values would require close monitoring and follow-up.

Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Thoracic Paravertebral Block Applications in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Thoracotomy in Geriatric Patients.

Background Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) are commonly used in geriatric patients for pain management after thoracotomy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of TEA and TPVB on postoperative analgesia in geriatric patients who underwent thoracotomy. Methodology Postoperative analgesia follow-up files of patients over 65 years of age who underwent thoracotomy were analyzed retrospectively. Patient's demographic data, diagnosis, type of surgery, postoperative 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, static/dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) scores, need for additional analgesics, global pain assessment, and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated with TEA (Group 1) and those treated with TPVB (Group 2). Results There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data (p > 0.05). MAP in the TEA group was statistically significantly lower than in the second and sixth-hour TPVB group (p = 0.008, p < 0.001). VAS static scores in the TEA group were statistically significantly lower at 30 minutes (p = 0.001), and at one, two, six, twelve, and twenty-four hours compared to the TPVB group (p < 0.001, except at 30 minutes). VAS dynamic scores were statistically significantly lower in the TEA group at 30 minutes, and at one, two, six, twelve, and twenty-four hours compared to the TPVB group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia (p > 0.05). The use of additional analgesics in the TEA group was statistically significantly lower than in the TPVB group (p < 0.001). Conclusions More effective postoperative analgesia results with stable hemodynamic conditions were observed in geriatric patients who underwent TEA for thoracotomy compared to TPVB. Regarding side effects, although there was a lower incidence in TPVB, this was not statistically significant when compared to TEA. TEA, as a component of the multimodal analgesia approach, can be accepted as a safe and effective method in the elderly patient group who underwent thoracotomy.

Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Combination in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.

Background The combination of a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the combination of TPVB and ESPB particularly on postoperative pain scores in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Methods From January 1, 2021, to March 1, 2021, 13 patients older than 18 years who underwent combined ESPB and TPVB for analgesic treatment after elective VATS were included in the study. Standard anesthesia induction was performed for all patients, and the block was performed in the lateral decubitis position before surgery. Using the in-plane technique, an ultrasound (US)-compatible 22-gauge, 8-mm nerve block needle was introduced 2-3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the T6 vertebra and advanced in the caudocranial direction. Fifteen (15) ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered and pleural depression was observed. The same needle was withdrawn from the paravertebral space and advanced into the interfascial plane above the transverse process and below the erector spinae muscle at the T5 level. Then, 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. Results The combination of TPVB and ESPB was performed in 13 patients. The mean age was 44.3 (21-68) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.21 (16.9-35.9) kg/m2. Postoperative 24 hours morphine consumption was 24.5 (16-42) mg. In three cases, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest were ≥4; therefore, tramadol (25 mg, IV) was given as an additional analgesic. Nausea and vomiting were observed in only one case in the early postoperative period. Conclusions As a new technique, the combination of TPVB and ESPB in this preliminary study provided effective postoperative pain management along with the use of morphine in acceptable quantities. Large-scale, randomized-controlled, and comparative studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of the combination of TPVB and ESPB.

Unexpected difficult intubation with a double-lumen tube in a case of asymptomatic vallecular cyst.

Vallecular cyst (VC) can cause difficult intubation. If a double-lumentube (DLT) has to be placed, difficulty in tracheal intubation becomes more complicated. The gum elastic bougie (GEB) is a widely used device for facilitating tracheal intubation.However, there is not enough study with DLT to make a predictionfor success of GEB-guided intubation. Here, we aimed to describe our approach during unexpected difficult intubation due to VC in a patient required DLT insertion. We emphasize that, in case of confronting a patient with asymptomatic VC as a cause of difficult intubation, a successful DLT intubation is possible by sliding endobronchial lumen of DLT over pediatric GEB.

Is there any difference between oral preemptive pregabalin vs. placebo administration on response to EBUS-TBNA under sedation?

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of preemptive oral pregabalin on hemodynamic response, anxiety, sedation, and recovery in patients who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) under sedation with intravenous ketamine-propofol combination. Materials and methods: Sixty patients were included in this study, and patients were randomly divided into two equal groups to receive the placebo (Group 1) versus pregabalin 150 mg (Group 2) one hour prior to EBUS- TBNA procedure. Patients received 0.25 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0.25 mg kg-1 propofol mixture (ketofol) for sedation. Timing of the parameters was defined as follows; T0: in hospital ward before pregabalin or placebo administration, T1: premedication, T2: in operating room, T3: before the procedure, T4: initiation, T5: 3 min after induction, T6: 6 min after induction, T7: 9 min after induction, and T8: 12 min after induction. Hemodynamic parameters, severity of coughing, sedation and anxiety scores, and complications were recorded. The level of satisfaction of the bronchoscopist and the patients were evaluated at the end of the procedure. Results: The heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in Group 1 (P = 0.008, P = 0.04). Total doses of anesthetics, recovery time, and desaturation rate were significantly higher in Group 1 (P = 0.014, P = 0.001, P = 0.045). In Group 2, SpO2 level was significantly higher at various time periods (T1; P = 0.025, T4; P =0.043, T6; P = 0.001, T7; P = 0.003, T8; P < 0.001). The severity of coughing was found significantly lower in Group 2 (T4; P = 0.011, T5; P = 0.01, T6; P = 0.02, T7; P = 0.03, T8; P < 0.01). Anxiety scores were significantly lower in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Preemptive oral pregabalin, in addition to sedation with ketamine-propofol combination, was effective in providing limited hemodynamic response, restricted coughing reflex, and lower anxiety during EBUS-TBNA. Besides, with pregabalin usage, decreased anesthetics consumption, lower complication rate, and shorter recovery time might have contributed to safety of the procedure and comfort of the bronchoscopist.

Effects of sugammadex on ischemia reperfusion in a rat extremity model.

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of our study is that sugammadex has protective efficacy against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats. METHODS: Our study included 28 male Wistar Albino rats. The rats were assigned to four groups. The sham group had no procedure other than anesthesia administration. The control group received three hours of ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion. The Sgdx4 group received 4 mg/kg, and the Sgdx16 group received 16 mg/kg sugammadex intravenously, and then, reperfusion was applied. Histopathological investigation, and serum creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and serum and tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) analyses were performed. RESULTS: When the sham group and the control group were compared, there were statistically significant differences histopathologically (p<0.01). There was no significant difference between the Sgdx4 group compared with the sham and control groups histopathologically (p>0.01). There was a significant difference between the Sgdx16 group and the sham group histopathologically (p<0.01). There were significant differences between the sham and control groups concerning CK and LDH levels (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in the levels of CK between the control group and Sgdx4 group and in the levels of CK and LDH between the control group and Sgdx16 group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In our study, we examined the histological and biochemical protective effects of 4 mg/kg sugammadex on unilateral lower extremity I/R injury in rats. The findings suggest that a 4 mg/kg dose of sugammadex was more effective than a 16 mg/kg dose.

EBUS may arise as an initial time saving procedure in patients who are suspected to have small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) commonly presents as hilar/mediastinal masses. In some occasions, conventional flexible bronchoscopy fails and a substantial amount of time is lost until establishing the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the superiority of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) compared to conventional methods in establishing the diagnosis as an initial modality as well as to point out the saved time until the diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who were diagnosed as SCLC by EBUS-TBNA between April 2010 and January 2016. The demographics of the patients, smoking history were all recorded. We also compared the time between the first computed tomography (1stCT) and first diagnostic procedure (1stDP), 1stDP and final diagnosis (FDx), 1stCT and FDx, and 1stDP and EBUS procedure were also compared. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients were included in the study. The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was 98.5%. The mean time between the 1stCT and 1stDP; 1stDP and FDx; 1stCT and FDx; 1stDP and EBUS procedure were 7.0 ± 9.0; 11.8 ± 16.1; 18.8 ± 17.9; and 10.8 ± 16.0 days, respectively. The time between 1stCT to 1stDP was not significantly different in patients with or without previous diagnostic procedures. However, the time between 1stDP to FDx and 1stCT to FDx were significantly higher in the patients with previous procedures (P < .001). The difference in time between 1stDP to FDx and 1stCT to FDx was also similar in patients with only hilar and/or mediastinal lesions (P = .001, P = .006, respectively). CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA may be an initial diagnostic procedure in SCLC. Patients with only hilar/mediastinal masses without any endobronchial lesion could be directed to centers with the capability for performing EBUS-TBNA to have a rapid diagnosis without any time loss.

Teaching practices of thoracic epidural catheterizations in different grade of anesthesia residents / Ensino da prática de cateterismo epidural torácico em diferentes anos de residência em anestesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to clarify the importance of residency grade and other factors which influence the success of thoracic epidural catheterization in thoracotomy patients. METHODS: After the ethical committee approval, data were recorded retrospectively from the charts of 415 patients. All patients had given written informed consent. The thoracic epidural catheterization attempts were divided into two groups as second-third year (Group I) and fourth year (Group II) according to residency grade. We retrospectively collected demographic data, characteristics of thoracic epidural catheterization attempts, and all difficulties and complications during thoracic epidural catheterization. RESULTS: Overall success rate of thoracic epidural catheterization was similar between the groups. Levels of catheter placement, number and duration of thoracic epidural catheterization attempts were not different between the groups (p > 0.05). Change of needle insertion level was statistically higher in Group II (p = 0.008), whereas paresthesia was significantly higher in Group I (p = 0.007). Dural puncture and postdural puncture headache rates were higher in Group I. Higher body mass index and level of the insertion site were significant factors for thoracic epidural catheterization failure and postoperative complication rate and those were independence from residents' experience (p < 0.001, 0.005). CONCLUSION: Body mass index and level of insertion site were significant on thoracic epidural catheterization failure and postoperative complication rate. We think that residents' grade is not a significant factor in terms overall success rate of thoracic epidural catheterization, but it is important for outcome of these procedures.

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Esclarecer a importância do ano de residência e outros fatores que influenciam o sucesso do cateterismo epidural torácico (CET) em pacientes submetidos à toracotomia. MÉTODOS: Após a aprovação do Comitê de Ética, os dados foram retrospectivamente analisados a partir dos prontuários de 415 pacientes. Todos os pacientes assinaram os termos de consentimento informado. As tentativas de CET foram divididas em dois grupos: segundo-terceiro ano (Grupo I) e quarto ano (Grupo II), de acordo com o ano de residência. Dados demográficos, características das tentativas de CET e todas as dificuldades e complicações durante o CET foram registrados retrospectivamente. RESULTADOS: A taxa de sucesso global de CET foi semelhante entre os grupos. Os níveis de colocação do cateter, o número e a duração das tentativas não foram diferentes entre os grupos (p > 0,05). A alteração do nível de inserção da agulha foi estatisticamente maior no Grupo II (p = 0,008), enquanto que a parestesia foi significativamente maior no Grupo I (p = 0,007). As taxas de cefaleia durante e após punção dural foram maiores no Grupo I. Um índice de massa corporal (IMC) maior e o nível do local de inserção foram fatores significativos para o fracasso do CET e para as taxas de complicações no pós-operatório, mas independentes da experiência dos residentes (p < 0,001, 0,005). CONCLUSÃO: O IMC e o nível do local de inserção foram significativos para o fracasso do CET e para as taxas de complicações no pós-operatório. Pensamos que o ano de residência não é um fator significativo em termos de taxa de sucesso global para o CET, mas é importante para o resultado desses procedimentos.