Prosthesis-prosthesis anastomosis using barbed sutures compared to conventional sutures under high, long-term pressure; in vitro extracorporeal circulation setup.

BACKGROUND: While barbed sutures have been extensively utilized in other disciplines, they have not been widely adopted in cardiac surgery. The lack of safety and feasibility data has limited its use within the field. To aide in the further understanding of how cardiac surgeons can use barbed sutures, we sought to develop a high-pressure in vitro simulation model. We compared knotless barbed sutures in a highly pressurized anastomosis to conventional sutures. METHODS: Ten specimens in total were utilized in prosthesis anastomosis, using 34 mm Gelweave Plexus (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, FL 33325, USA) and 34 mm Hemabridge (Intergard Woven Hemabridge, Getinge, Göteborg, Sweden). Five models of size 3-0 barbed suture anastomoses using non-absorbable, barbed, self-retaining, monofilament polypropylene sutures (Filbloc® 3-0, Assut Europe, Rome, Italy) were compared against five conventional anastomoses using size 4-0 polypropylene monofilament (Ethicon, USA). The systems were connected using a novel-designed extracorporeal circulation system. Pressure was rapidly increased in the specimen to a mean pressure of 300-350 mmHg, running then for a minimum of 48 hours to assess anastomosis strength and endurance. RESULTS: No anastomotic dehiscence or rupture was recorded. Complex, angular anastomosis required extra stitch leakage sutures in both conventional and barbed suture specimens. CONCLUSION: Using knotless barbed sutures with an additional self-locking maneuver for prosthesis-prosthesis anastomosis in cardiac surgery is feasible in an in vitro model under long term, high-mean pressure when compared to conventional sutures. In vivo trials should be performed to further validate the in vitro findings.

Reoperation for bleeding after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cardio-surgical haemostatic management is centre-specific and experience-based, which leads to a variability in patient care. This study aimed to identify which postoperative haemostatic interventions may reduce the need for reoperation after cardiac surgery in adults. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study in a tertiary centre. Adult, elective, primary cardiac surgical patients were selected (n = 2098); cases (n = 42) were patients who underwent reoperation within 72 h after the initial surgery. Interventions administered to control surgical bleeding were compared for the need to re-operate using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Rate of cardiac surgical reoperation was 2% in the study population. Three variables were found to be associated with cardiac reoperation: preoperative administration of fresh frozen plasma (OR 5.45, CI 2.34-12.35), cumulative volume of chest tube drainage and cumulative count of packed red blood cells transfusion on ICU (OR 1.98, CI 1.56-2.51). CONCLUSION: No significant difference among specific types of postoperative haemostatic interventions was found between patients who needed reoperation and those who did not. Perioperative transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, postoperative transfusion of packed cells and cumulative volume of chest tube drainage were associated with reoperation after cardiac surgery. These variables could help predict the need for reoperation.