Esophageal Lichen Planus Is Associated With a Significant Increase in Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Esophageal lichen planus (ELP) is a chronic inflammatory process characterized by apoptotic activity of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells on basal keratinocytes as well as regulatory and helper T cells.1-3 Due to chronic inflammation, malignant transformation may be a concern and has been documented in case reports.4,5 We describe the occurrence of esophageal cancer in ELP patients from a large tertiary patient population.

The diagnosis of esophageal eosinophilia is not increased in the summer months.

Smaller studies have suggested seasonal variation of the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis with more patients being diagnosed in the aeroallergen season. We evaluated a large group of adult patients for a seasonal variation of the diagnosis of symptomatic eosinophilic esophageal infiltration. We performed a retrospective review of adult patients from a large Eosinophilic esophagitis database at the Mayo Clinic Rochester. We only included patients from three states in the upper Midwest, who had 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field on esophageal biopsy, symptomatic dysphagia, and were seen, in our Gastroenterology Clinic between 2000 and 2008. Clinical data were abstracted and the month of diagnosis was determined. The Rayleigh circular test and the Chi-square goodness-of-fit test were used to detect seasonality of symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia diagnosis and seasonality corrected for esophagogastroduodenoscopy monthly volume. The diagnosis of symptomatic eosinophilic esophageal infiltration was made in 372 patients. The mean number of eosinophils was 39.6 per high-power field. The December/January and May/June periods seem to have an increased presentation rate (p = 0.014). Of those tested, reactions to any aeroallergen was present in 69 % (48/70), reactions to >4 aeroallergens in 47 % (33/70) and reactions to any food allergen in 63 % (50/80) of patients. There was no evidence of monthly concentration of symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia diagnosis in the subgroups of patients with any positive aeroallergen, >4 positive aeroallergens, or history of atopy. The diagnosis of symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia is not made more frequently in the summer months.

Once-daily omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate heals severe refractory reflux esophagitis with morning or nighttime dosing.

BACKGROUND: Morning dose or twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is often prescribed to heal severe reflux esophagitis. AIM: Compare the effect of single dose morning (control arm) versus nighttime (experimental arm) omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate (Zegerid(®)) (IR-OME) on esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. METHODS: Adult outpatients with Los Angeles grade C or D esophagitis were allocated to open-label 40 mg IR-OME once a day for 8 weeks in a prospective, randomized, parallel design, single center study. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and validated self-report symptom questionnaires were completed at baseline and follow-up. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 128 (72 %) eligible subjects participated [64 (70 %) male, mean age 58 (range 19-86), median BMI 29 (range 21-51), 58 C:34 D]. Overall, 81 (88 %) subjects healed [n = 70 (76 %)] or improved [n = 11 (12 %)] erosions. There was no significant difference (morning vs. night) in mucosal healing [81 vs. 71 %, (p = 0.44)] or symptom resolution [heartburn (77 vs. 65 %, p = 0.12), acid regurgitation (82 vs. 73 %, p = 0.28)]. Prevalence of newly identified Barrett's esophagus was 14 % with half diagnosed only after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily IR-OME (taken morning or night) effectively heals severe reflux esophagitis and improves GERD symptoms. Results support the clinical practice recommendation to repeat EGD after 8 weeks PPI therapy in severe esophagitis patients to assure healing and exclude Barrett's esophagus.

Does gastric resection have a role in the management of severe postfundoplication gastric dysfunction?

BACKGROUND: Bloating, flatulence, early satiety, and dysphagia resolve in more than 90% of patients early after fundoplication. Gastric dysfunction can persist, however, and a small number of patients develop severe gastric dysfunction (gastroparesis). Management of gastroparesis after antireflux procedures is generally conservative, but gastroparesis can become refractory to medical therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the role of gastric resection in the management of the unusual patient with severe postfundoplication gastric dysfunction. METHODS: From January 1990 to October 2010, a total of 5,129 gastric resections were performed at our institution. From this cohort, we identified nine patients with postfundoplication gastric dysfunction managed with gastric resection. Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively for preoperative evaluation, perioperative course, and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Over 20 years, nine patients were treated with gastric resection for debilitating gastric dysfunction after antireflux surgery. Seven of the nine patients were female; the median preoperative body mass index was 25 kg/m(2) (18-31 kg/m(2)). Median follow-up was 23 months (1-97 months). Preoperatively, five patients required enteral feeding. Postoperatively, although there were no deaths, one patient required operative drainage of a subphrenic abscess, one developed temporary respiratory failure, and one was readmitted for partial small bowel obstruction. Six of the nine patients maintain their nutrition orally, but three are maintained with enteral nutrition. Only two patients are subjectively asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after gastric resection for postfundoplication gastric dysfunction are poor, with three of the nine patients requiring supplemental nutrition and seven of the nine having persistent symptoms.

Low grade esophageal eosinophilia in adults: an unrecognized part of the spectrum of eosinophilic esophagitis?

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined by a minimum of 15 eosinophils (eos) per high-powered field (HPF) on esophageal biopsy, along with esophageal symptoms and the exclusion of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). The clinical significance of fewer eosinophils is unknown. METHODS: Fifty-nine adult patients without a previous diagnosis of EoE with esophageal biopsies containing 1-14 eos per HPF (low grade eosinophilia) and 418 adult patients with ≥15 eos per HPF were identified by retrospective review. Patients were divided into group A (1-9 eos per HPF), group B (10-14 eos per HPF), and group C (≥15 eos per HPF) with a chart review of clinical and demographic data. RESULTS: While dysphagia and atopy (asthma and allergic rhinitis) were more common in patients with ≥15 eos per HPF (group C) than those with low grade esophageal eosinophilia (groups A and B) (93 vs. 88%, P = 0.02), food impaction and heartburn occurred at an equal frequency across all patient groups. Endoscopic findings were likewise similar between groups. Of the 14 patients with low grade esophageal eosinophilia who underwent repeat endoscopy a mean interval of 42 weeks (range 8-118 weeks) later, five (36%) met conventional diagnostic criteria for EoE of 15 or greater eos per HPF. Follow-up in ten patients treated with topical corticosteroids noted improvement in nine, with mean follow-up of 8 weeks (range 4-12 weeks). CONCLUSION: Some adult patients with dysphagia and less than 15 eos per HPF have similar endoscopic findings and clinical course to patients meeting the consensus definition of EoE. Further evaluation of patients with low grade esophageal eosinophilia is needed.

Occurrence of and risk factors for complications after endoscopic dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Several small series have suggested an increased risk of complications associated with esophageal dilation in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). OBJECTIVE: To quantitate the risk and identify risk factors for esophageal complications in dilation in EoE patients. DESIGN: Retrospective, uncontrolled, single-center study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 161 EoE patients (mean ± standard deviation age 44.3 ± 15.3 years, 112 men, 49 women, 150 white patients, 10 unknown, 1 Asian). INTERVENTIONS: Through-the-scope balloon or Savary dilation of EoE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The rate of complications defined as deep mucosal tear, major bleeding, or perforation, and determination of risk factors for complications. RESULTS: A total of 293 dilations were performed in 161 patients. Complications reported were deep mucosal tear in 9.2% (n = 27), major bleeding in 0.3% (n = 1), and immediate perforation in 1.0% (n = 3). All patients with perforations were successfully treated medically without surgery (mean ± standard deviation hospital stay 5.3 ± 3.2 days). Factors associated with an increased risk of complications were luminal narrowing in the upper (odds ratio [OR], 5.62; 95% CI, 2.07-15.26; P < .001) and middle third of the esophagus (OR, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.64-14.83; P < .005) compared with lower third, luminal stricture unable to be traversed with a standard upper endoscope (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.06-5.83; P = .037), and use of Savary dilator (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.18-5.83; P = .018). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, uncontrolled study. CONCLUSIONS: Deep mucosal tears are common after dilation (9%), but the risk of immediate transluminal perforation with EoE is approximately 1%. The risk of severe complications is increased in patients with more proximal stricture and strictures that initially prevent endoscope passage.

Marked deposition of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

OBJECTIVES: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by infiltration of eosinophils into esophageal epithelium. Blood levels of an eosinophil granule protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), have been proposed as a biomarker for EoE. However, information regarding localization of EDN in the diseased tissues has not been available. The goal of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and distribution of EDN deposition in tissue specimens from the esophagus of EoE patients. METHODS: We studied specimens from 10 adult EoE patients and eight histologically normal controls (three under age 17). Sections from mid-esophageal biopsy specimens were stained for EDN by immunofluorescence, using a polyclonal rabbit antibody to EDN. Cellular staining (i.e., infiltration of intact eosinophils) and extracellular staining (i.e., deposition of released EDN) were scored in a blinded manner on an established 7-point scale. RESULTS: Esophageal biopsy specimens from histologically normal controls showed no or few intact eosinophils and no or minimal extracellular EDN deposition. In contrast, EDN staining was clearly observed in specimens from all EoE patients. In some EoE patients, marked extracellular EDN deposition was observed despite relatively small numbers of intact eosinophils. Overall, there was no correlation between the eosinophil infiltration and the extracellular EDN staining scores. CONCLUSIONS: Marked tissue deposition of extracellular EDN is present in the esophagus of EoE patients. Tissue eosinophil counts may underestimate how extensively eosinophils are involved, particularly in individuals with marked eosinophil degranulation. Evaluation of EDN staining in esophageal biopsy specimens may be useful to diagnose and manage patients with EoE.

Silent perforation: an iatrogenic complication of colonoscopy.

A 55-year-old woman presented with a complaint of 3 months of bloody diarrhea with an approximately 8 stools per day. She initially underwent a flexible sigmoidoscopy at an outside hospital with biopsies showing acute and chronic colitis. She was started on asacol 2 tablets 3 times per day. Her symptoms persisted and she was placed on prednisone with only transient improvement in her symptoms. She continued to have diarrhea and malaise with 30-lb weight loss over 2 months. Outpatient colonoscopy was performed for evaluation of this change in bowel habit. Colonoscopy showed 2-cm terminal ileal polyp, focal ulcer of the cecum, and severe ulcerative colitis from mid-ascending colon to rectum, with touch friability, spontaneous bleeding, pseudopolyps, and ulceration. Multiple biopsies were taken of the friable and ulcerated regions. After colonoscopy, the patient remained stable with no complaints of pain. She was then taken for computed tomographic enterography showing severe colitis but also reflecting a large amount of air surrounding the right abdominal structures including the liver, gallbladder, right kidney, and right side of the colon. Air extended inferiorly into the right thigh and superiorly into the chest where it reached the mediastinum and pericardium. There was also a small amount of air in the peritoneal cavity under the diaphragm and adjacent to the liver. These findings were thought most likely secondary to asymptomatic colonic perforation secondary to colonoscopy. The patient remained stable, afebrile, and pain-free small bowel pathology from colonoscopy revealed carcinoid tumor of the terminal ileum. The patient remained stable despite intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, and subcutaneous free air on follow-up x-ray. Patient underwent elective ileocecectomy 2 weeks later with postoperative films showing no evidence of free air. Iatrogenic perforation of the colon is a rare but feared complication of coloscopy with an incidence in some studies of 0.03% to 0.09%. This case demonstrates asymptomatic colonic perforation to a dramatic effect.

Prevalence and predictive factors of eosinophilic esophagitis in patients presenting with dysphagia: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an increasingly recognized cause of dysphagia. We prospectively assessed the prevalence of EE using midesophageal biopsies in patients presenting with no endoscopically evident cause of dysphagia. We also aimed to determine the clinical and endoscopic factors predictive of EE in outpatients undergoing endoscopy for dysphagia. METHODS: Outpatients (18-60 yr of age) undergoing endoscopy for dysphagia at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between June 2005 and June 2006 were enrolled. Patients completed the validated Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire (MDQ). Biopsies were obtained from the midesophagus if there was no endoscopically evident cause of dysphagia or there were endoscopic findings suggestive of EE. EE was defined as the presence of >20 eosinophils/high-power field. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of EE. RESULTS: Of 376 patients enrolled, 238 (63%) completed the MDQ and 222 (59%) had midesophageal biopsies; 33 (15%, 95% CI 6%-12%) had EE by biopsy. Ten of 102 (9.8%) patients who appeared endoscopically normal had EE by biopsy, while 8 of 21 (38%) patients with endoscopic changes suggestive of EE had EE on biopsy. Predictors of EE were younger age, endoscopic features suggestive of EE, absence of use of proton pump inhibitors, and a history of any food impaction for greater than 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: Midesophageal biopsies from normal-appearing mucosa should be obtained in all patients with unexplained solid food dysphagia; this may diagnose EE in about one in 10 cases.

Acute pancreatitis secondary to adenomatous transformation of the ampulla of Vater in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis.

We present an unusual case of pancreatitis secondary to a polyp obstructing the papilla, treated endoscopically. A 45-year-old woman with familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome and prior total colectomy presented with acute pancreatitis. Upper endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticogram revealed significant periampullary tissue. Sphincterotomy and endoscopic snare resection of the polyp were performed without complications. Local, noninvasive procedures are a promising diagnostic and therapeutic modality which has significantly less morbidity and mortality than conventional surgical techniques, and may be a reasonable alternative in the management of such patients.

Gastrointestinal plasmacytoma that caused anemia in a patient with multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: A 70-year-old white male diagnosed with IgA lambda multiple myeloma, who had been treated with two cycles of melphalan and prednisone, was evaluated for persistent anemia. He had required more than 15 U of packed red blood cells within a 2-month period for his anemia, despite recombinant erythropoietin treatment, and his hemoglobin level was persistently below 9 g/dl. INVESTIGATIONS: Physical examination and laboratory tests, which included a red blood cell mean corpuscular volume, platelet counts, coagulation studies, a peripheral blood smear, lactate dehydrogenase level, haptoglobin and bilirubin level, vitamin B12 and folate level, serum iron studies, bone marrow biopsy and immunophenotyping. Additionally, Congo red staining of the subcutaneous fat aspirate and a bone marrow biopsy were carried out, as well as esophagogastroduodenoscopy with gastric and duodenal biopsies. DIAGNOSIS: Gastrointestinal plasmacytoma. MANAGEMENT: Control of underlying disease (multiple myeloma) with 2 cycles of treatment with melphalan and prednisone followed by high-dose pulse dexamethasone chemotherapy as outlined by the oncologist. PPI therapy was continued and NSAIDs were avoided. The patient died because of infectious complications with subsequent multi-organ failure while awaiting work up for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Metastatic malignant melanoma of the gastrointestinal tract.

Malignant melanoma is one of the most common malignancies to metastasize to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Metastases to the GI tract can present at the time of primary diagnosis or decades later as the first sign of recurrence. Symptoms may include abdominal pain, dysphagia, small bowel obstruction, hematemesis, and melena. We report 2 cases of malignant melanoma metastatic to the GI tract, followed by a review of the literature. The first case is a 72-year-old man who underwent resection of superficial spreading melanoma on his back 13 years previously who presented with dysphagia. A biopsy specimen of a mucosal fold in a gastric fundus noted during endoscopy was taken and revealed metastatic malignant melanoma, which was resected 1 month later. Three weeks later, the patient was found to have an ulcerated jejunal metastatic melanoma mass, which was also resected. The second case is a 63-year-old man with an ocular melanoma involving the chorold of the left eye that had been diagnosed 4 years previously, which had been excised several times, who presented with anorexia, dizziness, and fatigue. He was found to have cerebellar and stomach metastases. He underwent adjuvant radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgical resection of the gastric melanoma metastasis. In patients with a history of melanoma, a high index of suspicion for metastasis must be maintained if they present with seemingly unrelated symptoms. Diagnosis requires careful inspection of the mucosa for metastatic lesions and biopsy with special immunohistochemical stains. Management may include surgical resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, observation, or enrollment in clinical trials. Prognosis is poor, with a median survival of 4 to 6 months.