Patterns and determinants of use of pharmacological therapies for intermittent claudication in PAD outpatients: results of the IDOMENEO study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) usually presents with intermittent claudication (IC). The aim of the present study was to assess, in clinical practice, the pattern of use of pharmacological therapies for IC in stable PAD outpatients. METHODS: A propensity analysis was performed using data from the IDOMENEO study, an observational prospective multicenter cohort study. The association between any pharmacological symptomatic IC therapy with different variables was investigated using generalized linear mixed models with pharmacological therapy as response variable and binomial error. RESULTS: Study population: 213 patients, male sex 147 (69.0%), mean age 70.0±8.6 years. Only 36.6% was under pharmacological treatment for IC, being cilostazol the most used medication (21.6%). Univariate analysis showed a probability of a patient of being assigned to any pharmacological symptomatic IC therapy of 67.0% when Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) <0.6 and 29.8% when ABI>0.6 (P=0.0048), and a propensity to avoid pharmacological treatment for patients with a high number of drugs to treat cardiovascular risk factors (probability of 55.2% for <4 drugs and 19.6% for >4 drugs, P=0.0317). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher probability of assigning treatment for ABI<0.6 (P=0.0274), and a trend to a lower probability in patients under polypharmacy (>4 drugs: OR=0.13, P=0.0546). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, only one third of stable outpatients with IC used symptomatic pharmacological therapy for IC. We found a propensity of clinicians to assign any symptomatic pharmacological IC therapy to patients with lower values of ABI and a propensity to avoid this kind of treatment in patients under polypharmacy.

A prospective multicentre study on the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and claudication symptoms in patients with peripheral artery disease (the IDOMENEO study).

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective multicenter cohort study was to characterise the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and intermittent claudication (IC) symptoms in clinical practice patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), and to determine the care gap with international guidelines and evidence-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2011 through 2013, participating centres enrolled consecutive patients with PAD of atherosclerotic, origin demonstrated by ultrasound, ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.9 and symptoms of IC. A seven item grid was built for the assessment of care gap (percentage of patients eligible for a treatment who did not receive it). cerebrovascular disease or at least two CVD risk factors. Care gap was lower than 25 % for any method to stop smoking, lipid lowering agents, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy and any kind of exercise program; between 25% and 50% for ACE inhibitors/ angiotensin II antagonist therapy; between 50% and 75% for beta-blocker therapy; and higher than 75% for supervised exercise program and use of cilostazol. Patients with and without CADI cerebrovascular disease were differently treated with clopidogrel (27.3% and 4.8 %, p < 0.001), any antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy (98.7% and 83.3 %, p <0.001) and beta-blockers (46.8% and 16.0%, p<0.001). RESULTS: All patients (232) presented at least one CVC risk factor, 90.2% at least two, and 91.5% had either established CAD or CONCLUSIONS: Many gaps with evidence-based recommendations are still present in the pattern of the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for CVD risk factors and IC symptoms in clinical practice PAD patients.

Venous thromboembolism in medical patients treated in the setting of primary care: a nationwide case-control study in Italy.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of venous thrombotic events (VTE) among medical outpatients is still not clear and it remains to be clarified whether medical diseases involve the same risk if managed at home or in hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate in the setting of outpatient family medicine the relationship between VTE and medical conditions known to be at risk during a hospital stay. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study involved a nationwide retrospective observation according to a nested case-control method; 400 general practitioners throughout Italy constituted the network for data collection. Between 2001 and 2004, all cases recorded as having VTE were entered; ten control patients without VTE, matched by sex, physician, and age, were selected from the database for each case. RESULTS: The eligible population comprised 372,000 patients and 1,624 incident VTE were recorded. Univariate analysis indicated hospitalization (OR 5.02; 95% CI 4.01-6.29), cancer (OR 3.06; 95% CI 2.47-3.79), acute infectious disease (OR 2.93; 95% CI 1.94-4.43), neurological disease (OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.56-4.33), congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.68-3.69), paralysis (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.51-2.32), COPD (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.29-1.95), stroke (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.24-2.12), superficial venous thrombosis (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.11-2.04, and rheumatic diseases (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.28-1.74) as significantly associated with an increased risk for VTE. After adjustment, only transient or definitive paralysis, cancer, acute infectious disease, congestive heart failure, neurological diseases, and previous hospitalization remained associated. CONCLUSIONS: This large study indicates that VTE outpatients seen by general practitioners in Italy have a high prevalence of the same medical diseases associated with VTE among patients treated in hospital.

D-dimer before chemotherapy might predict venous thromboembolism.

To see whether D-Dimer levels can identifying patients at high risk of venous thrombotic events and establish the best benefit/risk-of-bleeding ratio. Current guidelines do not recommend routine prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, but the risk increases about 6.5-fold because of this treatment. D-dimer was measured at baseline in 124 cancer patients scheduled for their first chemotherapy. VTE events, including symptomatic episodes of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism or both, were recorded during the first 6 months of therapy, and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis was revealed by compression ultrasonography at baseline and after 90 and 180 days. During follow-up, there were 11 episodes of VTE (8.9%). Mean D-dimer values were higher in patients with VTE (2195 +/- 1382 vs. 695 +/- 1039 ng/ml, (P < 0.001). On grouping D-dimer values in tertiles, only 2.4% (confidence interval, 0.9-5.7%) in the first (<262 ng/ml) and second tertiles (262-650 ng/ml) suffered a deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism event as compared with 22% (confidence interval, 9-34%) in the third (>650 ng/dl) (P = 0.003). The VTE-free interval was significantly shorter in the third tertile than in the first (P = 0.0218, log-rank test; relative risk for third vs. first tertile, 11.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-81.3; P = 0.0033). Multivariate analysis found that only baseline D-dimer concentrations were correlated with the subsequent development of VTE. Baseline D-dimer values in cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy might be used to select those at low risk of VTE, most likely to be safe without prophylaxis.

The impact of antithrombotic prophylaxis on infectious complications in cancer patients with central venous catheters: an observational study.

Infections in cancer patients after implantation of a central venous device (CVD) are not infrequent and are potentially serious. The possibility of limiting this complication with antithrombotic drugs is still debated. For this observational study, we recorded the routine management of CVD in cancer patients in 18 oncology centers in Lombardy (northern Italy), assessing the effect of antithrombotic prophylaxis on catheter-related infections. Out of 1410 patients enrolled, 451 received antithrombotic prophylaxis continuously after implantation of the central line. During a median follow-up of 30 months, 57 catheter-related infections were reported in the 1390 patients seen at least once at follow-up visits (4.1% of the whole series), giving an overall incidence of 0.10 infections per 1000 catheter days. This complication was significantly more frequent among patients with an indwelling central venous catheter, or peripherally inserted catheter, than among those with a port device, and the group not given antithrombotic prophylaxis had 0.14 infective complications/1000 CVD days compared with 0.05/1000 CVD days (odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.7-5.0) for those treated. Antithrombotic prophylaxis protected against infections at the catheter exit site and track but not against systemic infections. Confirming earlier evidence, this study found a reduction in catheter-related infections in patients given antithrombotic prophylaxis. However, this reduction, reflecting local infections, seems unlikely to be one of the mechanisms explaining the lower mortality among our patients treated with anticoagulants.