Risk Factors Associated with Cystoid Macular Edema among Patients Undergoing Primary Repair of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

PURPOSE: To investigate predictors of the development and resolution of cystoid macular edema (CME) after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. DESIGN: Retrospective cross sectional study. SUBJECTS: Patients who underwent primary repair of uncomplicated RRD. METHODS: Demographics, ophthalmic history, visual acuity, RRD features, time to development/resolution of CME, OCT characteristics of CME/epiretinal membrane (ERM), type of surgery, and treatments were collected. Logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of CME development and resolution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of CME development and resolution. RESULTS: A total of 708 eyes were included, of which 55 (7.8%) developed CME. Factors associated with an increased risk of CME development included total number of retinal detachment surgeries (odds ratio [OR] 1.66 [1.24-2.23], P < 0.001), prior intraocular surgery (OR 4.43 [1.19-16.51], P = 0.03), and presence of ERM after surgery (OR 4.49 [2.30-8.74], P < 0.001). Patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) were more likely to develop CME compared with patients undergoing scleral buckling (SB; OR 3.09 [1.18-8.10], P = 0.02). A longer average time to CME detection was associated with lower CME resolution (OR 0.94 [0.89-0.998], P = 0.04). In patients who developed an ERM postsurgically, those who developed CME after ERM had a lower rate of resolution compared with those who developed CME before ERM (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cystoid macular edema may be more likely to develop in patients undergoing PPV than SB, those who underwent more surgeries for RRD repair, those who had prior intraocular surgery, or those who developed an ERM after RRD repair. Resolution of CME may be affected by the time to detection of CME and ERM development. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Patient Utilization of Premium Intraocular Lenses Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: To compare the choice of intraocular lens (IOL) and sociodemographic characteristics between patients who underwent elective cataract surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic and during the pandemic at the Wilmer Eye Institute. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent cataract surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic (June 1 to November 30, 2019) and during the pandemic (June 1 to November 30, 2020) was conducted. Sociodemographic information, including age, sex, race, and insurance, and choice of IOL (premium or standard) were analyzed. The association between timing of surgery and choice of IOL was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The study included 2,877 patients (3,946 eyes) before COVID-19 and 2,564 patients (3,605 eyes) during COVID-19. However, 9.0% (357/3,946) of surgeries before COVID-19 used premium IOLs compared with 11.1% (399/3,605) during COVID-19 ( P =0.004). There was no difference in the racial characteristics of patients between before and during COVID-19. After adjusting for time of surgery and demographics, the odds of choosing premium IOLs for black patients was 0.32 times the odds for white patients ( P <0.001). There was an increase in private-insured patients but a decrease in Medicare-insured patients during COVID-19. After adjusting for time of surgery and demographics, private-insured patients had higher odds of choosing premium IOLs ( P <0.001), whereas Medicaid-insured patients had lower odds ( P =0.007) when compared with Medicare-insured patients. CONCLUSION: More patients chose premium IOLs during COVID-19 than before COVID-19, concurrent with change in insurance status. White patients were more likely to choose premium IOLs than black patients, as were private-insured patients compared with Medicare-insured patients.

Association of Kidney Function Measures With Signs of Neurodegeneration and Small Vessel Disease on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for cognitive decline, but evidence is limited on its etiology and morphological manifestation in the brain. We evaluated the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) with structural brain abnormalities visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also assessed whether this association was altered when different filtration markers were used to estimate GFR. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study nested in a cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 1,527 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. PREDICTORS: Log(UACR) and eGFR based on cystatin C, creatinine, cystatin C and creatinine in combination, or ß2-microglobulin (B2M). OUTCOMES: Brain volume reduction, infarcts, microhemorrhages, white matter lesions. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable linear and logistic regression models fit separately for each predictor based on a 1-IQR difference in the predictor value. RESULTS: Each 1-IQR lower eGFR was associated with reduced cortex volume (regression coefficient: -0.07 [95% CI, -0.12 to-0.02]), greater white matter hyperintensity volume (logarithmically transformed; regression coefficient: 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.15]), and lower white matter fractional anisotropy (regression coefficient: -0.08 [95% CI, -0.17 to-0.01]). The results were similar when eGFR was estimated with different equations based on cystatin C, creatinine, a combination of cystatin C and creatinine, or B2M. Higher log(UACR) was similarly associated with these outcomes as well as brain infarcts and microhemorrhages (odds ratios per 1-IQR-fold greater UACR of 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13-1.52] and 1.30 [95% CI, 1.12-1.51], respectively). The degree to which brain volume was lower in regions usually susceptible to Alzheimer disease and LATE (limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 [Tar DNA binding protein 43] encephalopathy) was similar to that seen in the rest of the cortex. LIMITATIONS: No inference about longitudinal effects due to cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: We found eGFR and UACR are associated with structural brain damage across different domains of etiology, and eGFR- and UACR-related brain atrophy is not selective for regions typically affected by Alzheimer disease and LATE. Hence, Alzheimer disease or LATE may not be leading contributors to neurodegeneration associated with CKD.

Associations among Visual, Auditory, and Olfactory Functions in Community-Based Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Purpose: Objective examination of relationships among visual, hearing, and olfactory function may yield mechanistic insights and inform our understanding of the burden of multiple-sensory impairments. Methods: This cross-sectional study capitalized on continuous measures of visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, pure tone audiometry, Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN), and Sniffin' Sticks from a subset of ARIC participants at two community sites (EyeDOC Study, 2017-2019). Scales of all measures were aligned such that higher values indicated greater impairment. Intersensory bivariate associations were assessed graphically, and correlations assessed using Kendall's tau. Intersensory associations, independent of age, education, smoking, diabetes, and hypertension, were examined using linear regression. Analyses were stratified by community/race (Washington County/White vs Jackson/Black) and sex (men vs women) to explore community-sex heterogeneity. Results: We included 834 participants (mean age, 79 years); 39% were from Jackson and 63% females. We found weak intersensory correlations (tau generally ≤0.15). In the demographics-adjusted regression models, results were heterogeneous across communities and sex. Worse near VA, contrast sensitivity, and olfaction were associated with worse QuickSIN and worse near VA was associated with worse olfaction in some but not all community/race-sex groups (e.g., Jackson/Black women, 0.1 logMAR worse near VA was associated with 0.27 units increase in QuickSIN [95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.45]). Associations were modestly attenuated by adjustment for the shared risk factors of smoking, diabetes, and hypertension. Conclusions: Visual dysfunction showed little or no association with hearing or olfaction impairments, suggesting a modest role for shared risk factors. Translational Relevance: Visually impaired individuals have only a modestly higher risk of other sensory impairment.