A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without the continuation of gefitinib after disease progression in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (JMTO LC12-01).

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib (G) is a recommended molecular-targeted agent for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Docetaxel (Doc) and pemetrexed (Pem) have similar efficacies, and either is often used as the sole agent during treatment. The efficacy of continuing G after progressive disease (PD) develops has been reported. It remains unclear whether the continuation of G in combination with a single cytotoxic agent beyond PD is beneficial for elderly patients. Here, we conducted a randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy with G for elderly patients with progressive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: Elderly patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with PD previously treated with G were enrolled. Patients received Pem 500 mg/m or Doc 60 mg/m every 21 days and were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with 250 mg G (G+ Doc/Pem arm) or without G (Doc/Pem arm) until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: This trial was terminated early owing to slow accrual. A group of 22 patients underwent analysis. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was significantly longer in the G + Doc/Pem arm (median: 1.6 months vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, p = 0.0391). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in the G + Doc/Pem arm (45.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on G and Pem or Doc beyond PD showed a longer PFS than those on single-agent chemotherapy; however, it was associated with increased toxicity.

Duration of Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy and Time From the Start of Any Treatment to the End of Chest Irradiation as Significant Predictors of Outcomes in Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of this retrospective study was that the duration of twice-daily (BID) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and time from the start of any treatment to the end of chest irradiation (SER) would predict outcomes in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 81 patients received 45 Gy in 30 fractions BID with a ≥ 6-hour interval and concurrent chemotherapy of platinum and etoposide. RESULTS: The median radiotherapy duration was 25 days (range, 21-38 days). The 5-year overall survival rates were 26.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.3%-38.0%), and the median survival time was 30 months (95% CI, 15.5-44.5 months). Using multivariate regression analysis, the significant predictors of survival were the sum of the diameters of the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes, male gender, age ≥ 60 years, and the duration of BID-TRT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25; HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.13-5.02; HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.10-5.17; and HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15, respectively). A total of 70 of 81 patients (86%) received radiotherapy during the first chemotherapy cycle. The median SER was 29 days (range, 21-109 days). The 5-year local control rate was 48.7% (95% CI, 33.9%-63.6%). The significant predictors of local control were the sum of the diameters of the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes, age ≥ 60 years, and SER (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31; HR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.23-14.24; and HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1-1.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The duration of BID-TRT and SER were identified as one of the significant predictors of survival and local control in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy at 45 Gy in 30 fractions, respectively.

Brain Metastasis of Pleural Mesothelioma after a Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon, fatal neoplasm induced by asbestos exposure. Brain metastases from MPM are extremely rare, with most such cases diagnosed only at the time of autopsy. This report describes what we believe to be the first case of MPM metastasizing to the brain after a subarachnoid hemorrhage, as well as the subsequent surgical removal of the brain metastasis.

Molecular analysis of human papillomavirus in never-smokers with non-small cell lung cancer.

The causes of lung cancer in never-smokers remain unclear. The potential contribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) to the carcinogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. In 2008, a prospective registry of never-smokers with NSCLC was established at the Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Osaka, Japan. Never-smokers with NSCLC were consecutively enrolled onto the registry. Of these patients, 114 with large tumor specimens, the majority of which were surgical tissues, were selected. In total, 23 of the most clinically relevant HPV types were assayed using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the viral genome. Following exclusion of samples with suboptimal quality, DNA was extracted from 96 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. These 96 cases consisted of 82 females (85.4%) and 14 males (14.6%), with a median age of 67 years (range, 29-83). Almost all cases (93.8%) were of the adenocarcinoma histological subtype. Despite confirmation of the quality and amount of DNA, HPV type 6 was detected in only one case (1.1%). Furthermore, no other samples examined were positive for any other HPV types. The results therefore suggest that HPV does not play a major role as the driving oncogenic event in never-smokers with NSCLC.

Long-term complete response in a patient with disseminated pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma induced by cisplatin and gemcitabine.

A 47-year-old man was referred to our department due to multiple metastases in the lungs and liver with pleural dissemination six weeks after undergoing curative surgery for lung pleomorphic carcinoma. He received two regimens of chemotherapy, both of which resulted in disease progression. Considering his good general condition, he was treated with cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP). The metastatic lesions exhibited a complete response after six courses of GP, and the patient has remained free from recurrence for over six years. An immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the tumor was highly expressive of gemcitabine transporter human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1, thus suggesting a high sensitivity to gemcitabine.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer.

First-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including gefitinib and erlotinib, have proven to be highly effective agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients harboring an activating EGFR mutation such as the exon 19 deletion mutation and L858R. Although those reversible small molecular targeted agents provide a significant response and survival benefit, all responders eventually acquire resistance. Second-generation EGFR-targeting agents, such as irreversible EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and pan-HER TKIs, may improve survival further and be useful for patients who acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This review discusses novel therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC using first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

[Treatment strategy for activating EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer after failure of first-generation EGFR-TKIs].

Somatic activating mutations such as a deletion in exon 19 or the missense mutation L858R in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)are important mediators of cancer cell oncogenesis, proliferation, and survival. In the last decade, two EGFR target agents have significantly contributed to the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib and erlotinib are first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors(EGFR-TKIs)that play a key role in activating EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Although these reversible, small, molecular target agents provide a significant response and survival benefit, all responders eventually acquire resistance. Although various mechanisms of resistance have been identified, nearly 3 0% of patients who acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs have an unknown mechanism of resistance. Approximately half the patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who develop acquired resistance to these molecular target agents have a secondary mutation T790M in the threonine gatekeeper residue that coexists with a primary EGFR activating mutation. The strategy for overcoming acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs is a major clinical concept. Afatinib is a second-generation EGFR-targeting agent and an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor. It may improve survival further and help in potentially overcoming resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In patients harboring activating EGFR mutations, certain treatments could be suggested for subsequent therapy after failure of first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This review discusses novel therapeutic strategies for activating EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC after failure of first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second- or third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial (DELTA).

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of erlotinib versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -unselected patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate, safety, and analyses on EGFR wild-type tumors. Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, previous treatment with one or two chemotherapy regimens, evaluable or measurable disease, and performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible. RESULTS: From August 2009 to July 2012, 150 and 151 patients were randomly assigned to erlotinib (150 mg daily) and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), respectively. EGFR wild-type NSCLC was present in 109 and 90 patients in the erlotinib and docetaxel groups, respectively. Median PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel was 2.0 v 3.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.55; P = .09), and median OS was 14.8 v 12.2 months (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.22; P = .53), respectively. In a subset analysis of EGFR wild-type tumors, PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel was 1.3 v 2.9 months (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.94; P = .01), and OS was 9.0 v 10.1 months (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.39; P = .91), respectively. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib failed to show an improvement in PFS or OS compared with docetaxel in an EGFR-unselected patient population.

A pilot study of cisplatin and etoposide with and without radiotherapy for advanced malignant thymoma.

AIM: Thymoma is a rare neoplasm of the mediastinum, for which very few data on the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are available. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the safety and efficacy of cisplatin, etoposide, and radiotherapy for thymoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced, previously-untreated thymoma (Masaoka classification), measurable disease, and a performance status of 0-2 were eligible, and were treated with cisplatin-plus-etoposide, together with radiotherapy when possible. RESULTS: One patient achieved complete response, and seven achieved partial responses. Progression-free survival was 37.7 months (95% confidence interval = 18.6-56.8 months). Ten patients had grade 4 neutropenia, and five patients had grade 3 febrile neutropenia. However, other toxicities were relatively mild. To date, only five patients (45.5%) have died, and the median survival time is 128.1 months (95% confidence interval = 51.6-204.6 months). Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy had a good response and long progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and etoposide with or without radiotherapy is effective for advanced thymoma, and has an acceptable toxicity.

Early pharmacodynamic assessment using ¹8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography on molecular targeted therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy for clinical outcome prediction.

Early prediction of therapeutic outcome is important in determining whether the ongoing therapy is beneficial. In addition to anatomical response determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, recent studies have indicated that change in tumor glucose use on or after treatment correlates with histopathologic tumor regression and patient outcomes. This Perspective discusses the use of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for pharmacodynamic evaluation in a very early phase of treatment to predict clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We conducted a study to assess whether early metabolic response determined using FDG-PET correlated with clinical outcomes in patients treated with gefitinib or those treated with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP). Early metabolic response to gefitinib, but not CP, correlated with the late metabolic response, anatomical response, progression-free survival, and even overall survival. A rapid effect of molecular targeted agents might not be aptly evaluated using the conventional criteria, eg, RECIST, in a very early phase of treatment before volumetric shrinkage of the tumor. Based on the findings of several studies, and on the findings from our study, use of FDG-PET might enable prediction of clinical outcomes at a very early stage of treatment, especially in patients treated with molecular targeted agents with rapid clinical efficacy.

Prospective phase II study of cisplatin plus pemetrexed with maintenance of pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: A previous study showed a survival benefit with maintenance therapy with pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unclear whether continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is beneficial in Japanese patients. Here, we present our phase II study that assessed the efficacy and safety of cisplatin plus pemetrexed as induction chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy with pemetrexed in advanced NSCLC patients in Japan. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients received 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day one every three weeks for four cycles. In patients who responded to therapy or achieved stable disease, pemetrexed was continued until disease progression. The primary endpoint of this study was the progression-free survival rate at six months (PFS-6). RESULTS: Of the 35 patients initially enrolled in the study, 18 (51%) received maintenance chemotherapy with pemetrexed. The median PFS was 6.7 months, and the PFS-6 was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42-76%). Median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months (95% CI, 8.3-22.7 months). The median PFS and OS in patients who received maintenance chemotherapy with pemetrexed were 9.5 months and 25.3 months, respectively. The most frequently noted severe toxicity during induction chemotherapy was neutropenia, which occurred in seven patients. Two patients discontinued maintenance therapy owing to prolonged grade 2 edema in one patient and grade 3 neutropenia in another. CONCLUSION: Continuation maintenance chemotherapy with pemetrexed is associated with a survival benefit in patients who have completed induction chemotherapy for non-squamous NSCLC.

Stratification of malignant pleural mesothelioma prognosis using recursive partitioning analysis.

PURPOSE: Prognostic factors and complicated prognostic models have been proposed for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study was designed to stratify MPM prognosis by using a simple model. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with MPM in the past 10 years (n = 122) were examined retrospectively. Data on the presence of chest pain, performance status (PS), asbestos exposure, smoking status, white blood cell count (WBC), haemoglobin (Hb) concentration, platelet count (PLT), lactate dehydronate (LD), histology, stage, and date of death or censored status were collected. After the factors were examined in the univariate analysis, recursive partitioning analysis was performed. RESULTS: Statistically significant factors related to survival were the type of histology, stage, PS, WBC, PLT, Hb concentration, and LD. Histology, stage, PS, and Hb concentration were used in multivariate analysis. Stage and Hb concentration showed good statistical significance, whereas PS was borderline significant. The survival analyses were stratified into five groups by PS, stage, Hb concentration, and chest pain using recursive partitioning analysis. Group A comprised patients showing the most favourable prognoses (PS 0-2 and Hb concentration >12.1 g dL(-1) or PS 0-2 and Hb concentration ≤12.1 g dL(-1) without pain), and group B comprised the remaining patients. The median overall survival in groups A and B was 563 days (95 % confidence interval [CI] 502-779) and 157 days (95 % CI 115-224), respectively (hazard ratio of 5.44 [3.46-8.53, P < 0.0001]). CONCLUSIONS: The MPM patients with PS 0-2 and Hb concentration >12.1 or ≤12.1 g dL(-1) without chest pain had favourable prognoses.

Carboplatin plus either docetaxel or paclitaxel for Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: Assessment of the efficacy of docetaxel plus carboplatin vs. paclitaxel plus carboplatin in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2 to 1 to receive six cycles of either docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)=6 mg/ml min] or paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin (same dose), on day 1 every 21 days. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled. Overall response rate, median PFS and median survival time in the docetaxel-plus-carboplatin group and the paclitaxel-plus-carboplatin group were 23% vs. 33%, 4.8 months vs. 5.1 months, and 17.6 months vs. 15.6 months, respectively. The docetaxel-plus-carboplatin group had a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (88% vs. 60%). CONCLUSION: Both regimens were similarly effective in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase2 study of bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel for non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is involved in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion (MPE), but little is known regarding the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) with carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) for NSCLC with MPE. Chemotherapy-naive non-SQ NSCLC patients with MPE were eligible to participate. Pleurodesis before chemotherapy was not allowed. In the first cycle, the treated patients received only CP to prevent Bev-induced wound healing delayed after chest drainage. Subsequently, they received 2-6 cycles of CP with Bev. Patients who completed more than 4 cycles of CP and Bev without disease progression or severe toxicities continued to receive Bev alone as a maintenance therapy. The primary end point was overall response, although an increase in MPE was allowed in the first cycle. The VEGF levels in plasma and MPE were measured at baseline, and the VEGF levels in plasma were measured after 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Between September 2010 and June 2012, 23 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 60.8 %; the disease control rate was 87.0 %. Sixteen patients received maintenance therapy, following a median of 3 cycles. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 7.1 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.6-9.4 months) and 11.7 months (95 % CI, 7.4-16.8 months), respectively. Most patients experienced severe hematological toxicities, including ≥grade 3 neutropenia; none experienced severe bleeding events. The MPE control rate improved on combining CP with Bev (CP, 78.3 %; CP with Bev, 91.3 %; P = 0.08). The median baseline VEGF level in MPE was 1798.6 (range 223.4-35,633.4) pg/mL. Plasma VEGF levels significantly decreased after 3 chemotherapy cycles (baseline, 513.6 ± 326.4 pg/mL, post-chemotherapy, 25.1 ± 14.1 pg/mL, P < 0.01). CP plus Bev was effective and tolerable in chemotherapy-naïve non-squamous NSCLC patients with MPE.

Histology and smoking status predict survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Results of West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) Study 3906L.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking status is one of the prognostic factors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, adenocarcinoma (Ad) histology is considered a predictive factor in advanced NSCLC. We investigated the correlation between histology or smoking status and survival of NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients who started first-line chemotherapy at affiliated institutions of West Japan Oncology Group from 2004 to 2005. We also collected information on pack-years of cigarette smoking and years since cessation. Overall survival was compared using log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: In total, 2542 consecutive patients were enrolled at 40 institutions. Of those, 71 were excluded because of unknown smoking history. The median overall survival of nonsmoking Ad patients (593 days) was longer than that of smoking Ad, nonsmoking non-Ad, and smoking non-Ad patients (384, 374, and 319 days, respectively; p < 0.001). In Cox regression with sex, age, stage, performance, and treatment as covariates, we found significant interaction (p = 0.039) between histology (Ad/non-Ad) and smoking status (smoker/nonsmoker); smoking conferred a hazard ratio of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.55) in Ad, but only 0.99 (0.75-1.31) in non-Ad. Higher pack-years and shorter period since cessation were significantly associated with poorer survival in Ad (p < 0.001), but not in non-Ad (p ≥ 0.434). CONCLUSION: Ad histology is associated with better prognosis, and only smoking status had a prognostic impact in Ad.

Phase II study of triplet chemotherapy using Tegafur-Uracil, Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of triplet chemotherapy using tegafur-uracil (UFT), vinorelbine, and gemcitabine for patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were subjected to a treatment regimen consisting of intravenous vinorelbine and gemcitabine on days 6 and 13, and oral UFT on days 1-5 and 8-12. This treatment was repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: All patients had an initial performance status of 0 to 1. The objective response rate was 21.9%, median survival time was 13.9 months, and the one-year survival rate was 56.7%. Grade 3/4 toxicities (% of patients) consisted of leukocytopenia (40.6%), neutropenia (56.3%), thrombocytopenia (3.1%), infection (9.4%), hypoxia (6.3%) and dyspnea (3.1%). CONCLUSION: Triplet chemotherapy using UFT, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated, with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, the response rate and median survival did not encourage for additional investigation.

Continued treatment with gefitinib beyond progressive disease benefits patients with activating EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib is an effective treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who harbor activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, no optimal strategy has been established for these patients after gefitinib fails. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the survival benefit of continued gefitinib treatment in these cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed gefitinib responders with activating EGFR mutations who developed progressive disease (PD) during the course of therapy. Prognostic variables were analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Exon-19 deletion mutations and L858R point mutations were detected in 71 and 63 patients, respectively. Median survival time after PD with gefitinib was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval: 11.7-16.9). The median duration of continued gefitinib therapy beyond PD was 3.2 months. Statistical analysis showed that good performance status (0-1) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.6), progression of a previously evaluated lesion (HR: 0.6), and at least 3 months of continued treatment (HR: 0.4) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Continuation of gefitinib beyond PD is an effective optional treatment in EGFR-mutated patients.

Personalized maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Maintenance therapy is a treatment strategy that can prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The increased survival achieved with maintenance therapy has led to new treatment options that should be chosen in accordance with the preferences of patients and physicians. Personalized maintenance therapy involves identification of histological subtypes and molecular features of tumors, thereby improving treatment outcomes. Many clinical trials have been conducted to establish new treatment strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC with non-squamous cell histology. The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations was the most significant innovation for personalized therapy in NSCLC patients. First generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib and erlotinib have significantly contributed to greatly increased survival in specific patients harboring activating EGFR mutations such as exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation. Based on clinical trials of different maintenance therapy strategies, we identified the regimen is the most promising and highlighted for patients whom should be given specific kinds of therapy now and in future studies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond progressive disease: a retrospective analysis for Japanese patients with activating EGFR mutations.

INTRODUCTION: It is not determined whether the continuous use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is reasonable for patients with activating EGFR mutations, who have progressed with the drug. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 2002 to 2010 of consecutive patients who had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations and showed radiological disease progression after EGFR-TKI treatment as the first-line or second-line setting. We classified them into two groups: continuous EGFR-TKI and switching to chemotherapy, and compared the clinical outcomes. Multivariate analysis for survival was performed including age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1/ 2-4), brain metastasis, EGFR mutations (deletions in exon 19 versus L858R), continuous EGFR-TKI (yes/no), and initiation of EGFR-TKI (first versus second). RESULTS: A total of 551 NSCLC patients were screened for EGFR mutations in the period, and 186 patients had activating EGFR mutations. To explore the potential use of EGFR-TKI beyond progressive disease (PD), 64 patients were selected and analyzed. There were 13 men and 51 women, and median age was 65.5 years (range, 42-86). Among them, 31 patients had deletions in exon 19, and 33 had point mutation of L858R in exon 21. Thirty-nine patients were continuing EGFR-TKI beyond PD; 25 patients were switched to cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. The median overall survival was 32.2 months in the patients continuing EGFR-TKI, and 23.0 months in the patients switching to chemotherapy, presenting a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.005). Cox analysis showed that continuous EGFR-TKI after PD (hazards ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.83, p = 0.013) was associated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Continuous use of EGFR-TKI beyond PD may prolong overall survival compared with switching to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with activating EGFR mutations. A prospective study will be needed to confirm our results.