Geroscience: Aging and Oral Health Research.

Research in aging has significantly advanced; scientists are now able to identify interventions that slow the biologic aging processes (i.e., the "hallmarks of aging"), thus delaying the onset and progression of multiple diseases, including oral conditions. Presentations given during the 3-part session "Geroscience: Aging and Oral Health Research," held during the 2023 American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research meeting, are summarized in this publication. Speakers' topics spanned the translational research spectrum. Session 1 provided an overview of the geroscience and health span (disease-free and functional health throughout life) concepts. The common molecular mechanisms between oral cancer and aging were discussed, and research was presented that showed periodontal microflora as a potential factor in Alzheimer's disease progression. Session 2 focused on behavioral and social science aspects of aging and their oral health significance. The keynote provided evidence that loneliness and isolation can have major health effects. These social conditions, along with poor oral health, tooth loss, and cognitive decline, could potentially affect healthy eating ability and systemic health in older adults. Research could help elucidate the directions and pathways connecting these seemingly disparate conditions. Session 3 focused on the delivery of oral care in different settings and the many barriers to access care faced by older adults. Research is needed to identify and implement effective technology and strategies to improve access to dental care, including new delivery and financing mechanisms, workforce models, interprofessional provider education and practice, and use of big data from medical-dental integration of electronic health records. Research to improve the "oral health span," reduce oral health disparities, and increase health equity must be tackled at all levels from biologic pathways to social determinants of health and health policies.

Oral Health Literacy, Preventive Behavior Measures, and Chronic Medical Conditions.

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between oral health literacy, preventive orientation and behaviors, and chronic medical conditions-specifically, hypertension and diabetes. A cross-sectional study was conducted with dental school patients attending the dental clinics in Los Angeles, California, and Baltimore, Maryland. Their health literacy levels were measured using the short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (Short-TOFHLA) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine and Dentistry (REALM-D). The medical history and existing medical conditions-specifically, hypertension and diabetes status-were extracted from patient health history and electronic records. Ten items were asked about preventive behaviors (e.g., brushing teeth in evening, smoking, exercise, drinking soda) and 3 preventive health services (dental checkup, flu shot, medical checkup). Six locus of control items were asked (e.g., good health is a matter of good fortune, what happens to my health is God's will). Out of 793 subjects, 221 had a documented history of hypertension, 88 with diabetes. There was an association between Short-TOFHLA scores and both diabetes and hypertension, but after controlling for sociodemographic and preventive variables, the association was no longer significant. In multivariate analysis, women, people with at least some college, Asians or non-Hispanic Whites, younger people, those who spoke English as a child, those who sought health information from the Internet or health care professionals, and those who smoked reported lower utilization of preventive health services, and those who had less locus of control reported higher Short-TOFHLA scores. There were no significant differences in mean REALM-D scores between patients who had hypertension or diabetes versus not having the condition. Multivariate models showed that people with higher REALM-D scores had at least some college, were other race/ethnicity or non-Hispanic White, spoke English as a child, and sought health information via the Internet. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study show that dental school patients exhibit a range of health literacy abilities and preventive behaviors, and health literacy measures positively correlated with some preventive behaviors but not others. Dental schools receive a significant number of patients with chronic diseases, and students should be educated to use effective patient communication skills to reinforce positive health behaviors among these patients.

An empirical test of the validity of the Oral Health Status Index (OHSI) on a minority population.

Disease varies in different populations based on sociodemographic variables, and there is limited understanding of this interaction. The purpose of this methodological study was to determine the validity of the Oral Health Status Index, a disease-based index, on a Hispanic population by comparing it with the NIDCR epidemiological measures of disease, with the addition of demographic and behavioral variables. The epidemiologic data were collected according to the criteria defined by the NIDCR, including: a modified Decayed Missing Filled Surfaces Index, gingival inflammation, calculus, and destructive periodontal disease measures. The demographic and behavioral variables were gathered from 240 interviews with Hispanic adults in two community clinics. Bivariate analysis was used to determine relationships between the descriptive epidemiologic, demographic, and behavioral variables and the Oral Health Status Index (OHSI). There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in mean OHSI scores among the demographic variables age, education, income, and place of birth; and the behavioral variables alcohol consumption, flossing, and acculturation. Multiple regression analysis with the OHSI as the dependent variable showed that the statistically significant (p < 0.001) epidemiologic predictors were: percentage of Decayed Teeth/Decayed, Filled Teeth; Number of Replaced Teeth/Missing Teeth; and millimeters of mesial attachment loss. These collectively explained 47.49% of the variance in the regression. The addition of demographic variables to the epidemiologic regression identified age (p < 0.05), gender (p < 0.01), and place of birth (p < 0.01) as significant predictors that explained an additional 4.12% of the variance, collectively bringing the total explained variance to 51.61%. The behavioral variables did not contribute significantly to predicting the OHSI regression score. The Oral Health Status Index in this study is validated by its correlation with both the epidemiologic measures and the demographic variables. This combination of variables separated the Hispanics into Mexicans and Central/South Americans.

Findings of clinical and radiographic caries among several adult age groups.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are aged-based variations in the association between clinically detected and radiographically detected caries and whether the prevalence of clinically undetected radiographic caries varies across adult age groups. STUDY DESIGN: The data for the analysis were from a clinical study that evaluated the efficacy of guidelines for prescribing dental radiographs. A total of 460 subjects had clinical examinations and interpretation made on full-mouth radiographs. Analysis was conducted to determine the tooth-specific and subject-specific prevalences of clinically undetected caries and to establish whether the association between clinical signs and radiographic signs varied by subject age. RESULTS: In total, approximately 5.8% of clinically sound teeth showed radiographic evidence of dentinal caries, and the prevalence increased with patient age. The prevalence of clinical signs of medium and large caries was 7.8% in 12,358 teeth in which caries was both clinically and radiographically present. However, for more than 80% of the teeth with clinically undetected caries, the lesions were evident on the interproximal radiographs. The associations between clinical and radiographic signs of dentinal caries were homogeneous across age groups. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that adolescents and adults continue to have medium and large caries, although the location of the caries differs by age group, with higher proportions of gingival caries in older patients.

Consistency of patient classification in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

The purpose of this study was to examine diagnosis and treatment planning categorizations used by experienced orthodontists. Thirty-nine clinicians were asked to evaluate six test cases and formulate a diagnosis and treatment plan for each. The information provided was categorized using a problem-oriented classification. The results indicate little agreement exists in diagnostic subcategories, such as molar relationship, degree of crowding, or the nature of skeletal discrepancies. There was also little agreement regarding some treatment strategies, such as extraction of teeth, the use of orthopedic appliances, or the use of surgery. A need exists for better definitions of diagnostic criteria and appropriate treatment options.

Mammography use in older women with regular physicians: what are the predictors?

Results of a longitudinal study of 1,050 women 65 years of age and older under the care of faculty internists demonstrate that individual and sociodemographic factors predict mammography use. The majority of the sample (79%) had received a mammogram within the past two years. Multiple logistic regression analyses of findings from a telephone survey showed that mammographic screening was significantly higher among women who had recently received a Pap smear, whose annual household incomes exceeded $30,000, and whose personal health care habits were preventively oriented; they used more preventive services such as routine dental care and engaged in more preventive behaviors such as seat-belt use and routine exercise. Mammography use was significantly higher among those 75 or younger. These findings suggest that enhancing patient preventive orientations should be part of interventions designed to increase screening. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): appropriateness review, preventive health services, utilization, aged, Medicare.

Efficacy of FDA guidelines for prescribing radiographs to detect dental and intraosseous conditions.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the FDA guidelines for ordering dental radiographs to a conventional full-mouth examination for the detection of intraosseous disease and conditions affecting teeth other than caries. STUDY DESIGN: We examined 490 patients and selected posterior bite-wing and periapical views as indicated by the patient's signs or symptoms. We compared the radiographic findings with the use of this selected set of radiographs to those from a full-mouth set of radiographs to determine the rates of missed disease when the FDA guidelines were used. RESULTS: The most commonly missed intraosseous findings were osteosclerosis, unerupted teeth, periapical radiolucencies, and primary root tips. Periapical radiolucencies that were most probably periapical cemental dysplasia were missed in six patients. The most commonly missed dental findings were resorbed roots and pulp stones. Three instances of dens in dente were missed. CONCLUSIONS: When we used the FDA guidelines, the number of missed intraosseous and dental conditions was small and most likely inconsequential given the range of variability in dental diagnosis and treatment.

Efficacy of FDA guidelines for ordering radiographs for caries detection.

This study evaluated the effect on caries diagnosis of using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for ordering radiographs on a sample of new adult patients seeking general dental care at a dental school clinic. These guidelines recommend posterior bitewing views accompanied by supplemental periapical views as indicated by the patient's clinical signs or symptoms. We compared the findings from the use of this protocol to those from a full-mouth set of radiographs made on the same new patient. We examined 490 patients and ordered periapical radiographs in accordance with the FDA guidelines, namely, when there was some clinical sign or symptom suggesting the need for radiographs. A full-mouth set of radiographs was obtained, and both the full and selected sets were evaluated separately. We found that 95% of our patients had one or more carious lesions, with an average of 5.7 carious teeth per patient. Of the 2808 carious teeth detected in the study, 1949 (69%) were found radiographically and 1564 (56%) were found clinically. Indeed, 1244 (44%) of the carious teeth were detected only by radiographic examination. Use of the FDA guidelines resulted in a 43% reduction in the number of radiographs ordered. Reduction in the number of images made on patients resulted in failure to detect 93 lesions (3.3%) located on 88 teeth in 11.4% of the study patients. Most of the missed lesions (2.9%) were radiographically confined to the enamel of anterior maxillary teeth. Only 36 of the missed lesions (1.6% of all radiographic lesions) extended into the dentin. We believe that this number is very small and most likely inconsequential compared with the considerable diversity among dentists regarding radiographic detection of caries, as well as the diversity of opinion regarding the indications for restorative treatment.

Radiographic secondary caries prevalence in teeth with clinically defective restorations.

Decisions to replace existing restorations are often based on clinical findings of margin discrepancies and other restoration defects. Previous studies have suggested that such findings do not correlate well with the actual presence of secondary caries, and that treatment should be deferred until caries is clinically or radiographically evident. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency with which clinically defective restorations are associated with radiographic secondary caries. As part of a study to assess the efficacy of guidelines for the ordering of dental radiographs, 6285 restored teeth in 490 subjects were examined clinically and radiographically by three calibrated investigators. Specific criteria were used to determine whether restorations were intact or defective. Of the total, 822 teeth (13%) were judged to have clinically defective restorations. Of these, 113 teeth (14%) had radiographic secondary caries. Of the 5463 teeth with intact restorations, 5% had radiographic secondary caries. We found that the likelihood of radiographic secondary caries was nearly three-fold higher for defective restorations than for intact restorations. The large percentage (86%) of defective restorations with no radiographic secondary caries suggests, however, that replacement of all defective restorations due to risk of secondary caries may constitute overtreatment. The use of defective restoration status and presence of radiographic secondary caries as a combined criterion for replacement may potentially reduce such overtreatment. The prevalence of secondary caries under defective restorations should be determined clinically so that the usefulness of combining the criteria of defective restoration with those of radiographic secondary caries can be evaluated.

Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists' decision making.

A study was conducted to determine the amount of diagnostic and treatment planning information gained by orthodontists when pretreatment radiographs are added to a set of orthodontic records. Thirty-nine orthodontists evaluated six test cases and formulated a diagnosis and treatment plan. Information was collected about the participants' certainty with their diagnoses and treatment plans, the impact of the radiographs, the number and type of radiographs that were selected, and the difficulty of each case. Results showed that orthodontists were approximately 75% confident of their diagnosis before reviewing any radiograph. There were 741 radiographs ordered, of which 192 produced changes to the diagnostic process. The lateral cephalometric radiograph was the most productive. Panoramic and full-mouth series were productive but provided largely duplicative information.