Postoperative Outcomes in Malleolar Fractures Fixed With a 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate Hook Plate.

Ankle fractures are among the most common types of fractures seen in the United States. Few studies have analyzed the use of a locking compression plate (LCP) hook plate in the fixation of malleolar fractures. The goal of this study was to analyze postoperative outcomes in malleolar fractures fixed with a 3.5-mm LCP hook plate. A cohort of 74 patients with ankle fractures treated operatively with hook plates between 2011 and 2021 by a single orthopedic surgeon was retrospectively reviewed. Time to union, duration of non-weight bearing, final range of motion, postoperative complications, demographics, and comorbidities were recorded. A total of 66 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. There were 5 isolated medial malleolar, 34 bimalleolar, and 27 trimalleolar fractures. There were 46 women and 20 men with a mean age of 60.9±18.9 years. Fourteen patients had diabetes, 27 had osteoporosis, and 4 were current or former tobacco users. All patients achieved union, with a mean time to union of 10.9±5.3 weeks. The mean time to weight bearing was 50.2±18.4 days. The mean length of follow-up was 8.1±5.6 months. At final follow-up, mean dorsiflexion was 9.9°±4.3° and mean plantarflexion was 14.1°±5.1°. Six patients experienced postoperative complications such as surgical site infections and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. This study demonstrates that the use of a 3.5-mm LCP hook plate in the operative fixation of malleolar fractures has a high rate of union while maintaining low rates of postoperative complications. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):340-344.].

Acceptable clinical outcomes despite high reoperation rate at minimum 12-month follow-up after concomitant arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and medial meniscal allograft transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Single-stage medial meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a technically challenging procedure for management of knee pain and instability in younger patients, but clinical and functional outcomes data are sparse. The purpose of this study was to assess surgical and patient-reported outcomes following concomitant ACLR and medial MAT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series of patients who underwent medial MAT with concomitant primary or revision ACLR at our institution from 2010 to 2021 and had minimum 12-month follow-up. Complications, reoperations, visual analog scale (VAS) pain, satisfaction, Lysholm score, return to sport, and return to work outcomes were assessed. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Physical Function Scores were used to measure patients' functional status relative to the US population. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 17 knees of 16 individual patients. The cohort was majority male (82.4%) with mean age of 31.9 years (range 19-49 years) and mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.9 kg/m2 (range 22.5-53.3 kg/m2). Mean follow-up time was 56.8 months (range 13-106 months). Most patients underwent revision ACLR (64.7%). The 1-year reoperation rate was high (23.5%), with two patients (11.8%) tearing their meniscus graft. Patient-reported outcomes indicated low VAS pain (mean 2.2), high satisfaction (mean 77.9%), and fair Lysholm score (mean 81.1). Return to work rate was high (92.9%), while return to sport rate was low (42.9%). Postoperative PROMIS scores were comparable or superior to the national average and correlated significantly with patient satisfaction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant ACLR and MAT procedure is associated with excellent knee pain and functional outcomes and high rate of return to work after surgery, though the 1-year reoperation rate is high and rate of return to sport is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.