[Overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants]. / Überdosierung von direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Incorrectly dosed DOAC treatment is associated with excess mortality. PURPOSE: This article aims at raising awareness of DOAC overdosing and its causes as well as presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a case presentation, a structured review of the current literature on DOAC overdosing was performed and treatment recommendations were extracted. RESULTS: In addition to wittingly or unwittingly increased DOAC intake, common causes of overdose are inadequate dose adjustment for concomitant medication or comorbidities. Global coagulation testing should be supplemented with DOAC-specific testing. Severe bleeding and the need for invasive diagnostics or urgent surgery represent indications for treating DOAC overdoses. Based on the cause of an DOAC overdose, active charcoal, endoscopic pill rescue, antagonization with idarucizumab or andexanet alfa and the targeted substitution of coagulation factors represent treatment options. CONCLUSION: The sensitization of clinicians is important to ensure a timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of DOAC overdosing. This report provides an overview of current knowledge on diagnostics and treatment; however, further studies are necessary to improve the existing algorithms.

Marked hyperferritinemia in critically ill cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate characteristics and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with marked hyperferritinemia. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis comprising cancer patients with a ferritin level >10.000 µg/L treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 59 years (range: 15-86 years). Females accounted for 48% of cases. 90% of patients had a hematologic malignancy. The median maximum ferritin level was 27.349 µg/L (range: 10.300-426.073 µg/L). The diagnostic criteria of septic shock were fulfilled in 51% of cases; 31% of patients had hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) according to the HLH-2004 criteria. Mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and the use of vasopressors were necessary in 59%, 35% and 70% of cases, respectively. The ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 33.3%, 23.1%, 23.7% and 11.7%. Patients with septic shock had a worse survival than those without septic shock (p = .001); the survival of patients who fulfilled the HLH-2004 criteria did not differ from those who did not (p = .88). CONCLUSION: Critically ill cancer patients with marked hyperferritinemia have poor outcomes. The present data may help to make informed decisions for this patient group.

[Handoffs in the intensive care unit]. / Übergaben auf der Intensivstation.

BACKGROUND: Effective handoffs in the intensive care unit (ICU) are key to patient safety. PURPOSE: This article aims to raise awareness of the significance of structured and thorough handoffs and highlights possible challenges as well as means for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the available literature, the evidence regarding handoffs in ICUs is summarized and suggestions for practical implementation are derived. RESULTS: The quality of handoffs has an impact on patient safety. At the same time, communication in the intensive care setting is particularly challenging due to the complexity of cases, a disruptive work environment, and a multitude of inter- and intraprofessional interactions. Hierarchical team structures, deficiencies in feedback and error-management culture, (technical) language barriers in communication, as well as substantial physical and psychological stress may negatively influence the effectiveness of handoffs. Sets of interventions such as the implementation of checklists, mnemonics, and communication workshops contribute to a more structured and thorough handoff process and have the potential to significantly improve patient safety. CONCLUSION: Effective handoffs are the cornerstone of high-quality and safe patient care but face particular challenges in ICUs. Interventional measures such as structuring handoff concepts and periodic communication trainings can help to improve handoffs and thus increase patient safety.

Single agent subcutaneous blinatumomab for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) molecule that redirects CD3+ T-cells to engage and lyse CD19+ target cells. Here we demonstrate that subcutaneous (SC) blinatumomab can provide high efficacy and greater convenience of administration. In the expansion phase of a multi-institutional phase 1b trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04521231), heavily pretreated adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) received SC blinatumomab at two doses: (1) 250 µg once daily (QD) for week 1 and 500 µg three times weekly (TIW) thereafter (250 µg/500 µg) or (2) 500 µg QD for week 1 and 1000 µg TIW thereafter (500 µg/1000 µg). The primary endpoint was complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) within two cycles. At the data cutoff of September 15, 2023, 29 patients were treated: 14 at the 250 µg/500 µg dose and 13 at 500 µg/1000 µg dose. Data from two ineligible patients were excluded. At the end of two cycles, 12 of 14 patients (85.7%) from the 250 µg/500 µg dose achieved CR/CRh of which nine patients (75.0%) were negative for measurable residual disease (MRD; <10-4 leukemic blasts). At the 500 µg/1000 µg dose, 12 of 13 patients (92.3%) achieved CR/CRh; all 12 patients (100.0%) were MRD-negative. No treatment-related grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurologic events (NEs) were reported. SC injections were well tolerated and all treatment-related grade 3 CRS and NEs responded to standard-of-care management, interruption, or discontinuation. Treatment with SC blinatumomab resulted in high efficacy, with high MRD-negativity rates and acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated adults with R/R B-ALL.

[Diagnostics and treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der hämophagozytischen Lymphohistiozytose.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperferritinemic hyperinflammatory syndrome. A primary hereditary form can be distinguished from a secondary acquired form. In adults the secondary form accounts for the vast majority of cases. Infections, malignancies and autoimmune disorders are common triggering factors of secondary HLH. Persistent fever, bicytopenia or pancytopenia and splenomegaly represent major symptoms in HLH and occur in virtually all patients. The diagnosis of HLH is made on the basis of the HLH-2004 criteria. The probability of the presence of HLH can be estimated using the HScore. Patients with HLH require immunosuppressive treatment. Hence, high doses of corticosteroids represent the cornerstone of treatment. Furthermore, immunoglobulins, anakinra, ruxolitinib or etoposide are given depending on the triggering factor. The course and prognosis of HLH are dependent on the early initiation of treatment, the triggering factor and the response to treatment.

Chlorhexidine gluconate-coated gel pad dressings for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic diseases or autologous stem cell transplantation: A registry-based matched-pair analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-coated gel pad dressings for central venous catheter (CVC) may prevent CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). However, real-world data showing beneficial effects in patients with hematologic malignancies are scarce. METHODS: In a matched-pair analysis with data from a multicenter CVC registry, non-tunneled jugular and subclavian vein CVC in adults with hematologic malignancies or germ cell tumors (including patients receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [ASCT]) with CHG were compared with non-CHG dressings. The primary endpoint was definite CRBSI rate within 14 days (dCRBSI14) of CVC insertion; secondary endpoints were combined rate of definite or probable CRBSI within 14 days (dpCRBSI14), overall (dpCRBSI), and CRBSI incidences of all estimates. RESULTS: In total, 2070 CVCs were assessed. There was no statistically significant difference in dCRBSI14 (2.3% vs. 3.5%) between patients with and without CHG gel dressings. Likewise, with regards to dpCRBSI14 (6.2% vs. 6.3%) and the overall dpCRBSI rate (9.2% vs. 10.5%), no significant difference was detected. Furthermore, dCRBSI14 incidence (2.0 vs. 3.2/1000 CVC days), dpCRBSI14 incidence (5.4 vs. 5.6/1000 CVC days), and overall CRBSI incidence (5.5 vs. 6.0/1000 CVC days) showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: CRBSI rates were not reduced by the use of CHG gel dressings in patients with hematologic malignancies and/or ASCT.

[With a tumor diagnosis in the intensive care unit]. / Mit einer Tumordiagnose auf der Intensivstation.

Tumor patients nowadays show significantly improved survival rates due to advancements in modern intensive care medicine, particularly in the case of organ failure. The previous reluctance towards implementing intensive medical care measures in patients with a tumorous disease is no longer justified. For successful intensive care treatment, the timing and the mode of admission along with the specific intensive care measures and underlying organ dysfunction(s) are crucial factors for the prognosis. To ensure appropriate treatment in clinical practice and to balance between overly restrictive admission criteria and overtreatment, a triage system could be beneficial. This would consider the prognosis of the underlying malignant disease, the performance status of the patient, available treatment options and a dynamic assessment of the course of the intensive medical care. Long-term results of tumor patients show that around 80% of tumor patients who have been in the intensive care unit present physical and mental health similar to those who were never admitted. Even the majority of patients who needed ongoing cancer treatment due to tumor stage did not show any differences in treatment intensity and their remission status after 6 months. A successful intensive care medicine, the individualized definition of aims, as well as adjustment of the treatment goals, require close collaboration between hematologists, oncologists, and intensive care physicians.

Hyperleukocytosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective analysis.

A relevant proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presenting with hyperleukocytosis are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data on characteristics and outcomes of these patients are limited. We therefore conducted a single-center retrospective analysis including 69 consecutive AML patients with a white blood cell (WBC) count > 100.000/µl who had been treated on the ICU between 2011 and 2020. The median age was 63 years (range: 14-87 years). Males accounted for the majority of cases (n = 43; 62.3%). Mechanical ventilation (MV), renal replacement therapy and the use of vasopressors were necessary in 34.8%, 8.7% and 40.6% of patients, respectively. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in 15.9% of patients. The ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 53.6%, 43.5%, 42% and 30.4%, respectively. Age (p = 0.002), SOFA score (p < 0.001) and MV (p < 0.001) were independently associated with a reduced survival probability. A score comprising the factors age > 70 years, lactate dehydrogenase level > 1500 U/l, WBC count > 150.000/µl, elevated lactate level and SOFA score > 7 allowed the discrimination of 3 distinct risk groups (low-risk: 0-1 points, intermediate-risk: 2 points, high-risk: 3-5 points) with regard to survival (p < 0.0001). Taken together, the present analysis indicates that more than two-thirds of AML patients with hyperleukocytosis treated on the ICU die within 1 year. However, outcomes vary considerably depending on the presence of risk factors.

Impact of the insertion site of central venous catheters on central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with cancer: results from a large prospective registry.

PURPOSE: Overall, insertion of central venous catheter (CVC) into femoral veins (FV) has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of infection compared with subclavian and internal jugular (IJV/SCV) CVC, but no data are available on the impact of the FV insertion site on the CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) risk in patients with cancer. The objective of the study is to compare CRBSI rates and incidences of FV with those of internal jugular and subclavian vein (IJV/SCV CVC) as observed in the prospective SECRECY registry. METHODS: SECRECY is an ongoing observational, prospective, clinical CRBSI registry active in six departments of hematology/oncology in Germany. Each case of FV CVC was matched at a ratio of 1:1 to a case with IJV/SCV CVC. The propensity score was estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, and duration of indwelling catheter. RESULTS: Of 4268 CVCs included in this analysis, 52 (1.2%) were inserted into the FV and 4216 (98.8%) into the IJV/SCV. 52 cases of FV CVC were matched with 52 IJV/SCV CVC. There was no significant difference in the CRBSI rate (3.8% vs. 9.6%), the CRBSI incidence (5.7 vs. 14.2/1000 CVC days), and the median CVC time (5.5 vs. 5 days) between the FV and the IJV/SCV group. CONCLUSION: Based on this data, inserting FV CVCs in patients with cancer does, at least in the short-term, not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CRBSI as compared to IJV/SCV CVC.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective analysis.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be associated with adverse events necessitating treatment on the intensive care unit (ICU). Data focusing on patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are scarce. We thus conducted a single-center retrospective analysis comprising 79 individuals who had high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2014 and 2020 and were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of conditioning therapy and day 30 after ASCT. The median age was 57 years (range: 20-82 years); 38% of patients were female. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (34%) and plasma cell disorders (28%) were the most common indications for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Sepsis represented the major cause for ICU admission (68%). Twenty-nine percent of patients required mechanical ventilation (MV), 5% had renal replacement therapy, and 44% needed vasopressors. The ICU, hospital, 90-day, and 1-year survival rates were 77.2%, 77.2%, 72.2%, and 60.3%, respectively. Stable disease or disease progression prior to the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy (p = 0.0028) and MV (p < 0.0001) were associated with an impaired survival. A total of 36 patients died during observation. The most frequent causes of death were the underlying malignancy (44%) and sepsis (39%). Taken together, the present analysis indicates a favorable overall outcome for patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Thus, this patient group should not be denied admission and treatment on the ICU.

JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Final results of a phase II, open label, multicentre clinical trial (JeRiCHO).

OBJECTIVES: Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsing after second-line therapy have a dismal prognosis and novel approaches are required for this patient group. Based on promising (pre-)clinical data and the favourable toxicity profile, we performed a phase II clinical trial with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL (r/r cHL). METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL who failed second-line treatment were included. Ruxolitinib was given orally at a dose of 25 mg twice daily in continuous 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the PET/CT-based overall response rate (ORR; complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) after 2 cycles; secondary endpoints included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as feasibility. The Jericho Trial adopted a 2-stage phase 2 design (Simon 1989). RESULTS: Among the 12 included patients in stage 1, 2 had a PR, 3 had a stable disease (SD) and 6 had progressive disease (PD) after two treatment cycles (ORR: 2/12 evaluable patients, 16.7%). Median PFS was 3.6 months, the 1-year OS estimate was 50.6% (median not reached). The toxicity profile was favourable with only one grade IV adverse event (7.1%) reported. CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib exhibited a favourable side effect profile but modest activity in r/r cHL. Although the formal stopping criterion after stage 1 was not met, the trial did not continue to stage 2 due to the low response and PFS rates observed in stage 1.

Scheduled removal of central venous catheters (CVC) to prevent CVC-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological disease or autologous stem cell transplantation: a registry-based randomized simulation-study.

Although not generally recommended, scheduled central venous catheter (CVC) removal is sometimes carried out in order to reduce the CVC-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) incidence. We conducted a simulation for scheduled CVC removal within the multicenter CRBSI registry (SECRECY). Non-tunneled jugular and subclavian CVC in patients with hematological disease or with germ cell tumors (including patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation [SCT]) were included. Cases were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to either a simulated, scheduled CVC removal after 7, 14, and 21 days, or to non-simulated, unscheduled CVC removal (control group). The primary endpoint was definitive CRBSI incidence for a scheduled CVC removal after 14 days (dCRBSI-D14rmv). Among other, secondary endpoints were definite CRBSI incidence for a scheduled removal after 7 days (dCRBSI-D7rmv) and 21 days (dCRBSI-D21rmv). Data on 2984 CVC were included. Patients' median age was 59 (range 16-95) years, 58.8% being male. The vast majority (98.4%) were patients with hematological malignancies. Jugular veins were the main insertion site (93.2%). dCRBSI-D14rmv was 3.10/1000 CVC days as compared to 4.15/1000 CVC days in the control group (p = 0.23). There was a significant difference between dCRBSI-D7rmv (0.86/1000 CVC days) and controls (p < 0.001), but not between dCRBSI-D21rmv (4.10/1000 CVC days) and controls (p = 0.96). Our data suggest that in patients with hematological diseases or autologous SCT recipients scheduled CVC removal after 14 days does not result in a lower CRBSI incidence compared to unscheduled removal.Trial registration: DRKS00006551, 2014/09/29, retrospectively registered.

[Intensive care management of cancer patients]. / Intensivmedizinische Betreuung hämatologischer und onkologischer Patienten.

Cancer patients compromise about 15-20 % of all patients on the intensive Care Unit (ICU). Moreover, recent therapeutic developments in hematology oncology as chimeric T-cells (CAR T-cells) regularly require critical care and therefore the amount of cancer patients in the ICU is expected to grow in the coming years. Although their prognosis has dramatically improved over the past decades, the mortality on cancer patients on the ICU is still high compared to non-cancer patients. Therefore, the interdisciplinary management of these patients is crucial in order to accurately identify patients who benefit from transfer to the ICU and to optimize treatment of these vulnerable and often complex patients. Consequently, large cohort studies have shown a positive impact of daily interdisciplinary patient visits including hematology-oncology and critical care medicine on survival of cancer patients on the ICU. This short review summarizes current knowledge and open questions in the critical care management of cancer patients.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) for severe respiratory failure in adult cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: The question of whether cancer patients with severe respiratory failure benefit from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) remains unanswered. We, therefore, analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes of a large cohort of cancer patients treated with vv-ECMO with the aim to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: 297 cancer patients from 19 German and Austrian hospitals who underwent vv-ECMO between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A multivariable cox proportional hazards analysis for overall survival was performed. In addition, a propensity score-matched analysis and a latent class analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 56 (IQR 44-65) years and 214 (72%) were males. 159 (54%) had a solid tumor and 138 (47%) a hematologic malignancy. The 60-day overall survival rate was 26.8% (95% CI 22.1-32.4%). Low platelet count (HR 0.997, 95% CI 0.996-0.999; p = 0.0001 per 1000 platelets/µl), elevated lactate levels (HR 1.048, 95% CI 1.012-1.084; p = 0.0077), and disease status (progressive disease [HR 1.871, 95% CI 1.081-3.238; p = 0.0253], newly diagnosed [HR 1.571, 95% CI 1.044-2.364; p = 0.0304]) were independent adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. A propensity score-matched analysis with patients who did not receive ECMO treatment showed no significant survival advantage for treatment with ECMO. CONCLUSION: The overall survival of cancer patients who require vv-ECMO is poor. This study shows that the value of vv-ECMO in cancer patients with respiratory failure is still unclear and further research is needed. The risk factors identified in the present analysis may help to better select patients who may benefit from vv-ECMO.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit during the peri-transplant period have unfavorable outcomes-results of a retrospective analysis from a German university hospital.

The prognosis of allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) has improved over the last decades. However, data focusing on patients treated in the ICU during the peri-transplant period are scarce. We therefore conducted an analysis comprising 70 patients who had allogeneic stem cell transplantation at the University Hospital Cologne between 2014 and 2020 and were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of conditioning therapy and day 30 after transplantation. The median age was 59 years (range: 18 - 72 years). 50% of patients were female. Sepsis was the most common cause for ICU admission (49%). Mechanical ventilation (MV) was required in 56% of patients, 27% had renal replacement therapy (RRT), and 64% needed vasopressors. The ICU, hospital, 90-day, and 1-year survival rates were 48.6%, 38.6%, 35.7%, and 16.2%, respectively. MV and/or RRT during the ICU stay were associated with an impaired survival (p < 0.0001). The same was true for the use of vasopressors (p < 0.0001). In contrast, baseline characteristics did not impact the outcome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 17% of patients. None of the patients undergoing CPR was alive at 1 year. Among patients who died after discharge from the ICU (n = 23), sepsis and other infectious complications represented the major causes of death (48%). Taken together, the present analysis indicates unfavorable outcomes for allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients admitted to the ICU during the peri-transplant period. The data may help to make informed decisions with patients and their families.

Reactivation of EBV and CMV in Severe COVID-19-Epiphenomena or Trigger of Hyperinflammation in Need of Treatment? A Large Case Series of Critically ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are common in critically ill patients and have been described in patients with severe COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether these reactivations are associated with increased mortality and whether targeted treatments are beneficial. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center cohort study, patients with severe COVID-19 treated on our intensive care unit (ICU) were screened for EBV and CMV reactivation as detected by polymerase chain reaction. If present, patient characteristics, temporal connections to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 diagnosis and corticosteroid use, the use of targeted treatments as well as the course of disease and outcome were analyzed. As control group, non-COVID-19 patients with sepsis, treated within the same time period on our ICU, served as control group to compare incidences of viral reactivation. RESULTS: In 19 (16%) of 117 patients with severe COVID-19 treated on our ICU EBV reactivations were identified, comparable 18 (14%) of 126 in the non-COVID-19 control group (P = .672). Similarly, in 11 (9%) of 117 patients CMV reactivations were identified, comparable to the 16 (13%) of 126 in the non-COVID-19 sepsis patients (P = .296). The majority of EBV (58%) and CMV reactivations (55%) were detected in patients under systemic corticosteroid treatment. 7 (37%) of 19 patients with EBV reactivation survived the ICU stay, 2 (29%) of 7 patients with rituximab treatment and 5 (42%) of 12 patients without treatment (P = .568). Five (50%) of 10 patients with CMV reactivation survived the ICU stay, 5 (83%) of 6 patients with ganciclovir treatment and 0 of 4 patients without treatment (P = .048). Follow-up analysis in these patients showed that the initiation of treatment lead to decrease in viral load. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are at a high risk for EBV and CMV reactivations. Whether these reactivations are a cause of hyperinflammation and require targeted treatment remains uncertain. However, in patients with clinical deterioration or signs of hyperinflammation targeted treatment might be beneficial and warrants further studying.

Reinduction therapy with everolimus in combination with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabin and cisplatinum in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: an experimental phase I/II multicentre trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG HD-R3i).

Reinduction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDCT + ASCT) is second-line standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) but has a high failure rate. Because response to reinduction is predictive of the outcome after HDCT + ASCT, we aimed to improve the standard dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatinum (DHAP) reinduction regimen by addition of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (everDHAP). Transplant-eligible patients aged 18-60 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL were included in this experimental phase I/II trial. Everolimus (10 mg/day, determined in phase-I-part) was administered on day 0-13 of each DHAP cycle. From July 2014 to March 2018, 50 patients were recruited to the phase II everDHAP group; two were not evaluable, three discontinued due to toxicity. Randomization to a placebo group stopped in October 2015 due to poor recruitment after nine patients. The primary end-point of computed tomography (CT)-based complete remission (CR) after two cycles of everDHAP was expected to be ≥40%. With a CT-based CR rate of 27% (n = 12/45) after two cycles of everDHAP the trial did not meet the primary end-point. Adding everolimus to DHAP is thus feasible; however, the everDHAP regimen failed to show an improved efficacy.