Successful treatment of acute kidney allograft rejection using extracorporeal photopheresis in the context of post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases: three successive cases.

We reported 3 kidney transplant patients with PTLD who developed mixed AR following IS treatment minimization. AR episodes were treated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), methylprednisolone and IVIG. In all patients, graft function improved under ECP and stabilized in the long term. These observations suggest that ECP is safe and efficient for treatment of AR in the context of PTLD.

T-bet+CD27+CD21- B cells poised for plasma cell differentiation during antibody-mediated rejection of kidney transplants.

Alloimmune responses driven by donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) can lead to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in organ transplantation. Yet, the cellular states underlying alloreactive B cell responses and the molecular components controlling them remain unclear. Using high-dimensional profiling of B cells in a cohort of 96 kidney transplant recipients, we identified expanded numbers of CD27+CD21- activated memory (AM) B cells that expressed the transcription factor T-bet in patients who developed DSAs and progressed to ABMR. Notably, AM cells were less frequent in DSA+ABMR- patients and at baseline levels in DSA- patients. RNA-Seq analysis of AM cells in patients undergoing ABMR revealed these cells to be poised for plasma cell differentiation and to express restricted IGHV sequences reflective of clonal expansion. In addition to T-bet, AM cells manifested elevated expression of interferon regulatory factor 4 and Blimp1, and upon coculture with autologous T follicular helper cells, differentiated into DSA-producing plasma cells in an IL-21-dependent manner. The frequency of AM cells was correlated with the timing and severity of ABMR manifestations. Importantly, T-bet+ AM cells were detected within kidney allografts along with their restricted IGHV sequences. This study delineates a pivotal role for AM cells in promoting humoral responses and ABMR in organ transplantation and highlights them as important therapeutic targets.

Management of Immunosuppression After Kidney Transplant Failure: Effect on Patient Sensitization.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive treatment is often interrupted in the first months following kidney transplant failure (KTF) to limit side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of prolonged treatment (PT) of more than 3 months' duration after KTF on HLA sensitization and treatment tolerance. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study involving 119 patients with KTF in 3 French kidney transplant centers between June 2007 and June 2017. Sensitization was defined as the development of HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA). RESULTS: In the PT group receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment, 30 of 52 patients (57.7%) were sensitized vs 52 of 67 patients (77.6%) who had early cessation of treatment (P = .02). The results were confirmed by multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.16; 0.98], P = .04). The development of de novo DSAs after CNI treatment (n = 63/90 [70.0%]) was significantly more frequent than during CNI treatment, (n = 18/52 [34.6%], P = .01). Panel-reactive antibody ≥85% was lower in the PT group in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.10; 0.78], P = .02). No differences in the rates of infection, cardiovascular complications, neoplasia, and deaths were observed between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, continuation of corticosteroid treatment had no influence on sensitization but was associated with a higher rate of infection (OR = 2.66, 95% CI [1.09; 6.46], P = .03). CONCLUSION: Maintenance of CNI treatment after return to dialysis in patients requesting a repeat transplant could avoid the development of anti-HLA sensitization with a good tolerance.

An extension of the RITUX-ERAH study, multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing rituximab to placebo in acute antibody-mediated rejection after renal transplantation.

The treatment of active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is still a matter of debate, the place of rituximab remaining controversial. The French multicenter double-blind RITUX-ERAH study included 38 patients with ABMR in the first year of renal transplantation. All patients received plasma exchanges, intravenous immunoglobulins, and corticosteroids and were randomly assigned rituximab or placebo infusion at day 5. Additional rituximab infusions were allowed. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 12-month graft survival and renal function were not different between the rituximab and placebo groups. Long-term data are needed to conclude. Evaluation of the 7-year outcomes of the RITUX-ERAH study patients according to the rituximab or placebo treatment received. Eleven patients received placebo and 27 at least one infusion of rituximab. Seven years after ABMR, death-censored kidney allograft survival and renal function were not different between the groups. The evolution of anti-HLA sensitization was similar. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infectious or neoplastic complications, but to be noted, seven cancers developed in six patients treated with rituximab (mean period of 44 months post-ABMR). In this cohort, there was no benefit 7 years after ABMR of rituximab in addition to plasma exchanges, intravenous immunoglobulins, and steroids.

Increased risk of rejection after basiliximab induction in sensitized kidney transplant recipients without pre-existing donor-specific antibodies - a retrospective study.

Depleting induction therapy is recommended in sensitized kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), though the detrimental effect of nondonor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is not undeniable. We compared the efficacy and safety of basiliximab and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) in sensitized KTRs without pre-existing donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). This monocentric retrospective study involved all sensitized KTR adults without pre-existing DSAs (n = 218) who underwent transplantation after June 2007. Patients with basiliximab and rATG therapy were compared for risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss and death) by univariate and multivariate analysis. Patients with basiliximab (n = 60) had lower mean calculated panel reactive antibody than those with rATG (n = 158; 23.7 ± 24.2 vs. 63.8 ± 32.3, P < 0.0001) and more often received a first graft (88% vs. 54%, P < 0.0001) and a transplant from a living donor (13% vs. 2%, P = 0.002). Risks of BPAR and of reaching the composite endpoint were greater with basiliximab than rATG [HR = 3.63 (1.70-7.77), P = 0.0009 and HR = 1.60 (0.99-2.59), P = 0.050, respectively]. Several adjustments did not change those risks [BPAR: 3.36 (1.23-9.16), P = 0.018; composite endpoint: 1.83 (0.99-3.39), P = 0.053]. Infections and malignancies were similar in both groups. rATG remains the first-line treatment in sensitized KTR, even in the absence of pre-existing DSAs.

Renal function at the time of nephrology referral but not dialysis initiation as a risk for death in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Renal patients with diabetes mellitus are at very high risk of death before and after chronic dialysis initiation. Risk factors for death in this population are not clearly identified. METHODS: We performed a retrospective survival analysis in 861 patients with diabetes mellitus consecutively followed up in the 2000-13 period in a nephrology setting. RESULTS: The mean age was 70 ± 10 years [men 65.2%; diabetes duration 13.7 ± 10.3 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 42.4 ± 21.0 mL/min/1.73 m2). During follow-up (median 60 months; up 15 years), 263 patients died (184 before and 79 after dialysis initiation) and 183 started chronic dialysis. In multivariate analyses, age, elevated systolic and low diastolic arterial pressures, peripheral artery disease, cancer, loop diuretic use and atrial fibrillation at baseline and acute kidney injury (AKI), heart failure (HF) and amputation during follow-up were identified as risk factors for death. After adjustments on these parameters, eGFRs at the time of the first outpatient visit-eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 {hazard ratio [HR] 1.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.17]}, P = 0.005 and eGFR <30 [HR 1.53 (1.05-2.05)], P = 0.004, but not eGFR <60-were powerful risk factors for death. When initiation of dialysis was entered into the multivariate models, it was not associated with a risk of premature death [HR 1.19 (95% CI 0.91-1.55), P = 0.2069], even in patients >80 years of age [HR 1.08 (95% CI 0.64-1.81), P = 0.7793]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes mellitus, high systolic and low diastolic arterial pressure, peripheral artery disease and development of AKI and HF are significant risk factors for death. In addition to these parameters, eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of referral is also a powerful risk factor for death.

Interstitial Nephritis Secondary to Vedolizumab Treatment in Crohn Disease and Safe Rechallenge Using Steroids: A Case Report.

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective humanized monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to the α4 ß7 integrin and acts as a lymphocyte-homing antagonist. It is indicated in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease. We report a case of acute interstitial nephritis following vedolizumab infusion in a 55-year-old white woman treated for severe Crohn disease resistant to several therapies. Other kidney disease causes were ruled out. Glucocorticoids were administrated, leading to full renal recovery. In the absence of other therapeutic options, vedolizumab was re-administered along with transient corticosteroids; this treatment was well tolerated. Fewer than 10 cases of immunoallergic acute interstitial nephritis following treatment with monoclonal antibody have previously been reported in the literature. The pathophysiology of delayed-type hypersensitivity secondary to monoclonal antibody therapeutics is discussed in this case report.