Interactive multidisciplinary pilot workshop to improve medical student perception of and interest in breast surgical oncology.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to breast surgical oncology (BSO) and the multidisciplinary management of patients with breast cancer is limited in medical school. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in student perceptions of BSO as a career following an interactive multidisciplinary workshop. METHODS: Pre-clinical medical students participated in a multidisciplinary, hands-on workshop, composed of breast radiology (BR), breast surgical oncology (BSO) and breast plastic reconstructive surgery (B-PRS). BR presented students screening and diagnostic breast imaging followed by hands-on ultrasound-guided biopsy on phantom simulators. BSO demonstrated lumpectomy, mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and axillary lymph node dissections while B-PRS demonstrated oncoplastic techniques and autologous flap reconstruction with cadavers. Pre-and post-workshop surveys assessed student opinions on surgery and BSO. Results were compared using Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Wilcoxon Rank Sum, and Fisher's Exact. RESULTS: The workshop was attended by twenty-four students. There was a statistically significant increase in interest in BSO from 52% to 86% after the workshop (p = 0.003). The event improved understanding of the work and lifestyle in BSO for 79% (19/24). All students (100%) expressed interest to further explore BSO. The most common attractors to a career in BSO were impacts on patients' lives (N = 23), intellectual stimulation (N = 22), and earnings (N = 20). The most reported deterrents were lack of personal time (N = 18) and stress (N = 15). CONCLUSION: An interactive, anatomically based exposure to multidisciplinary breast cancer surgery improves medical student perception and interest in BSO. Medical schools should consider incorporating similar events to foster interest in BSO and other surgical subspecialties.

Evaluation of learning curve with Indocyanine Green (IcG) versus blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (IcG) is an alternative to isosulfan blue (IB) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer (BC). IcG carries improved cost and safety, but oncologic data upon implementation in practice is limited. We evaluated the learning curve defined as oncologic yield and operative (OR) time for IcG in SLN mapping in BC. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients >18 years with cTis-2 cN0 BC undergoing surgery first with SLN biopsy using IB or IcG. Analysis compared IB versus IcG across three time cohorts. RESULTS: Of 278 patients, 77 received IB and 201 received IcG. OR time was longer for IcG (p â€‹= â€‹0.022). There was no difference in oncologic yield between groups (p â€‹= â€‹0.35, p â€‹= â€‹0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons may be able to safely transition from IB to IcG for patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing surgery first. Individuals should track their own data to confirm safety of the technique.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and intervention for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) significantly decreases progression to persistent BCRL (pBCRL). We aimed to provide long-term follow-up on our early detection with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and early home intervention demonstrating reduced pBCRL to guide surveillance recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 148 female patients with breast cancer who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) from November 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. Baseline BIS measurements and postoperative follow-up occurred every 3 months for 1 year, biannual for 1 year, and then annually. An elevated BIS triggered evaluation and initiation of at-home interventions with reassessment for resolution versus persistent BCRL (pBCRL). High-risk factors and timing were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 55 months, and 65 (44%) patients had an abnormal BIS. Of these, 54 (82%) resolved with home intervention. The overall pBCRL rate was 8%. Average time to first abnormal BIS was 11.7 months. None of the stage 0 patients (0/34) and only 5/25 (20%) of stage 1 patients had pBCRL. All of stage 2 and stage 3 patients (7/7) had pBCRL. pBCRL correlated with number of positive nodes, percentage of positive nodes, stage of lymphedema at diagnosis, and recurring abnormal BIS measurements (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that patients undergoing ALND with early BCRL identified by BIS who performed home interventions had an 8% pBCRL rate. Patients at high risk for pBCRL should have routine surveillance starting at 9 months postoperatively to identify an opportunity for early intervention.

Safety of de-escalation of surgical intervention for atypical ductal hyperplasia on percutaneous biopsy: One size does not fit all.

BACKGROUND: Oncologic safety of active monitoring (AM) for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) on core-needle biopsy (CNB) is not well defined. We sought to define oncologic outcomes for AM to manage ADH meeting institutional predefined low-risk criteria (LOW). METHODS: ADH was diagnosed on CNB from 10/2015-03/2020. LOW (pure ADH, size <1 cm, >50% removed by CNB, <3 foci, and no necrosis) patients were offered AM; all others were recommended for surgical excision. Oncologic outcomes were compared for AM and surgery. RESULTS: 111 were included, 21 (19%) meeting LOW. AM occurred in 18 (86%) while 3 elected for excision (with 0% upgrade). Of the 18 LOW in AM, 2 required additional CNB (none at ADH site): 0% were diagnosed with cancer over median 23 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There were no missed cancers at ADH site during AM for LOW, confirming the oncologic safety of AM in this select group.

Rethinking Routine Surgical Excision for all Radial Sclerosing Lesions of the Breast.

INTRODUCTION: The need for routine surgical excision of a radial sclerosing lesions (RSL) of the breast identified on percutaneous biopsy remains controversial, as contemporary upgrade rates are lower than historically cited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively-maintained database of high-risk breast biopsies undergoing multidisciplinary review at a single institution was queried to identify cases of RSL from 2/2015 to 11/2020. Demographic, radiologic, and pathologic variables were summarized using frequencies and analyzed in association with RSL excision status using mixed-effects logistic regression or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: 217 RSL were identified, diagnosed at a mean age of 57 y. The median imaging size was 1.3 cm and the majority had estimated >50% of the target removed by core needle biopsy. 32.3% underwent surgical excision of the RSL biopsy site and 2/70 (2.9%) upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on final surgical pathology. Upgrade was significantly higher for atypical RSL (P = 0.02). None of the RSL (n = 60) without atypia who had undergone excision were upgraded. For those omitting surgical excision, there was no subsequent breast cancer diagnosis at the RSL site over a mean follow-up of 23 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical excision may be omitted for RSL without atypia as this group has 0% risk of upgrade after multidisciplinary review.

The clinical impact of MRI on surgical planning for patients with in-breast tumor recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of breast MRI for patients with known in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). The aim was to determine if the addition of breast MRI altered surgical approach or multidisciplinary management. Previous studies have focused on using breast MRI for surgical planning for index breast cancers (BC) or detecting IBTR. However, the clinical impact of obtaining MRI in the setting of known IBTR has not been evaluated. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to compare surgical approach and multidisciplinary management for patients diagnosed with isolated IBTR who did and did not undergo breast MRI following IBTR diagnosis. RESULTS: IBTR was identified in 69 patients, 46% of whom underwent MRI. There was no difference in the operative approach (p = 0.14) for IBTR patients who did and did not undergo breast MRI Additionally, there was no difference in multidisciplinary care, treatment order, metastatic disease identification, or mortality between cohorts. A relatively small subgroup of patients (n = 3) required change in surgical plan based on MRI results. Patients proceeding with surgery first who also underwent breast MRI experienced a significantly longer time to surgical intervention (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Breast MRI following IBTR diagnosis infrequently impacted clinical management, including surgical approach and multidisciplinary care. MRI for local disease assessment at the time of IBTR should be used selectively based on clinical concern.

Prognostic Significance of Lobular Carcinoma In-Situ (LCIS) Diagnosed Alongside Invasive Breast Cancer.

Purpose: Women with lobular carcinoma in-situ (LCIS) have an increased risk for developing breast cancer (BC) compared with the general population. However, little is known about the clinical implication of diagnosing LCIS concurrently with an invasive breast cancer. We aimed to define the rate of LCIS diagnosed concurrently with an invasive breast cancer and investigate the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) during survivorship care. Materials and methods: A single center retrospective review over 6 years identified women with stage I-III BC who underwent lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy. Patients with or without concurrent LCIS were compared using Chi-squared analyses to assess for differences in clinicopathologic factors and risk of future CBC (including invasive and in-situ disease). Results: Of 1808 patients, 16.6% (n = 301) had LCIS concurrent with their index breast cancer. Patients with LCIS had a higher rate of subsequent CBC development than those without LCIS (3.3% versus 1.0%, P = .004). The risk ratio for patients with LCIS developing subsequent CBC compared with those without LCIS was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-7.3). Conclusions: Patients with LCIS diagnosed concurrently with their index breast cancer at surgery are at higher risk for subsequent CBC than those without LCIS. The evidence from this study suggest that it may be appropriate for women with LCIS diagnosed alongside an index breast cancer to consider on-going high-risk screening during survivorship care.

Is image-guided core needle biopsy of borderline axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients clinically helpful?

BACKGROUND: When borderline axillary lymph nodes (bALN) are identified on ultrasound (US) for breast cancer (BC) patients, preoperative management is unclear. We aimed to evaluate if core needle biopsy (CNB) for bALN is clinically helpful or disruptive. METHODS: Retrospective review of BC patients with bALN from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Clinicopathologic data were compared for those who did and did not have CNB. RESULTS: CNB (n = 34) and no CNB (n = 31) were similar with respect to clinicopathologic factors. Surgical LN-positive rate was the same between cohorts (p = 0.26). CNB was disruptive in 58.8 %; all had CNB for pN0 disease. CNB was helpful in 34.2 %: 14.7 % proceeded directly to axillary dissection; 17.6 % had positive LN localized after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: CNB for bALN is more likely clinically disruptive and did not impact surgical LN positive rate. BC patients with bALN should undergo CNB only if it will change clinical management.

Multidisciplinary Review of Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast can Identify Patients who may Omit Surgical Excision.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to define contemporary management recommendations regarding who would benefit from surgical excision of intraductal papilloma (IDP). METHODS: A prospective database from a single institution identified patients with IDP on percutaneous biopsy from February 2015 to September 2020. Categorical patient demographic, biopsy, and pathologic variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and continuous demographic and imaging variables using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: IDP was present in 416 biopsies, at a median age of 56 years. The median size was 0.9 cm, and the majority had greater than 50% of the target excised by biopsy. Surgical excision was performed for 124 of 416 biopsies (29.8%). Upgrade to malignancy was identified in 14 (11.3%): 8 to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 6 to invasive cancer. Upgrade was significantly associated with concurrent ipsilateral breast cancer (p = 0.027), larger imaging size (p = 0.045), <50% excised with biopsy (p = 0.02), and atypia involving IDP (p = 0.045). Age, clinical presentation, and concurrent contralateral cancer were not significantly associated with upgrade. Lowest upgrade risk (0%) was in pure IDP ≤1 cm with >50% removed by biopsy. Of 401 biopsies that either did not upgrade or undergo excision, 7 (1.7%) developed subsequent breast cancer over a median follow-up of 23.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11,41), none at IDP site. CONCLUSIONS: After multidisciplinary review, the management of IDP can be stratified into low- and high-risk for upgrade groups using key criteria. Low-risk group may omit surgical excision, because those patients have 0% risk of upgrade over the limited short-term follow-up.

Is bioimpedance spectroscopy a useful tool for objectively assessing lymphovenous bypass surgical outcomes in breast cancer-related lymphedema?

PURPOSE: We sought to determine if bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements can accurately assess changes in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in patients undergoing lymphovenous bypass (LVB). METHODS: Patients undergoing LVB for BCRL refractory to conservative treatment from 1/2015 to 12/2018 were identified from an IRB-approved prospectively maintained database at a single institution. All breast cancer patients were assessed with baseline BIS measurements prior to any oncologic surgery and serial BIS during follow-up office visits including before and after LVB. Clinicopathologic information, LVB operative details, and pre- and post-LVB operative BIS measurements were collected. Analysis focused on clinically significant BIS change, defined as two standard deviations (SD), and comparing LVB anastomosis to BIS changes. RESULTS: During the study timeframe, nine patients underwent LVB for treatment of BCRL. The majority (78%) received radiation, taxane chemotherapy, and underwent axillary dissection. An average of 5.6 LVB anastomoses were performed per patient. The average change in BIS following LVB was a 3SD reduction, indicating a clinically significant change. This improvement was stable over time, with persistent 2SD reduction at 22 months postoperatively. The number of LVB anastomoses performed did not significantly correlate with the degree of BIS change. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to utilize BIS measurements to assess response to LVB surgical intervention for BCRL. BIS measurements demonstrated clinically significant improvement after LVB, providing objective evidence in support of this surgical treatment for BCRL. BIS changes should be reported as key objective data in future studies assessing BCRL interventions, including response to LVB.

Is axillary imaging for invasive lobular carcinoma accurate in determining clinical node staging?

PURPOSE: Preoperative evaluation of clinical N-stage (cN) is difficult in breast cancer patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Our goal was to assess the predictive value of axillary imaging in ILC by comparing imaging cN and pathologic N-stage (pN). METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed for newly diagnosed stage I-III ILC patients undergoing preoperative breast imaging from 2011 to 2016. Clinicopathologic factors; mammogram, MRI, and ultrasound findings; and surgical pathology data were reviewed. Sub-analysis for pN2-N3 patients was performed to determine imaging sensitivity for patients with a larger nodal disease burden. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each imaging modality. RESULTS: Of the total 349 patients included, 70.5% were cN0, and 62% were pN0 (p = 0.03). For all patients, mammogram sensitivity was 7%, specificity 97%, PPV 50%, NPV 72%; ultrasound sensitivity was 26%, specificity 86%, PPV 52%, NPV 67%; MRI sensitivity was 7%, specificity 98%, PPV 80%, NPV 51%. For pN2/N3 patients, 38% were identified as cN0. Mammogram sensitivity was 10%; ultrasound 42%; MRI 65%. Pathology evaluation of N2/N3 patients indicated LN were replaced with ILC but maintained normal architecture. The average largest pathologic tumor deposit (1.5 ± 0.8 cm) correlated with average largest imaging LN size (1.4 ± 0.6 cm) (p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: A statistically significant difference between clinical and pathologic N-stage exists for ILC patients. MRI was most sensitive for identification of pN2-N3 patients and should be considered part of routine axillary imaging evaluation for ILC patients.

Secondary angiosarcoma following catheter-based brachytherapy.

Secondary angiosarcoma of the breast following catheter-based brachytherapy after lumpectomy is rare. We describe a case of a patient with breast cancer treated with partial mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy followed by accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), who developed skin changes 6 years after completion of therapy. Punch biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of secondary angiosarcoma. This case is even more unique in that the location of the skin changes was remote to the lumpectomy site. There is a critical need to recognize secondary angiosarcoma presentation after APBI and determine the rate of occurrence compared with traditional external beam irradiation.

Does the Addition of Breast MRI Add Value to the Diagnostic Workup of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has unique histologic growth pattern. Few studies have focused on the value of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) specifically for ILC. We hypothesized that MRI adds value to the diagnostic workup in ILC by better defining the extent of disease and identifying additional foci of malignancy, which can change the surgical plan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of women diagnosed with ILC from 1/2012 to 7/2019 who underwent preoperative MRI. Patient, tumor characteristics, and initial surgical plan were reviewed. MRI had added value if ILC size correlated best to final pathologic size or if additional malignancy was identified. MRI was considered harmful if additional biopsies were benign or if the size was overestimated. RESULTS: ILC was identified in 166 breasts in 165 women. Original surgical plan was for lumpectomy in 86 (52%), mastectomy in 49 (30%), and undecided in 31 (18%). MRI changed the plan in 25 (19%) with 24 (96%) changing from lumpectomy to mastectomy. Additional biopsy was performed in 28% after MRI, the majority (n = 41, 72%) were benign or high risk and 16 (28%) identified additional malignancy. MRI was not a better size estimate than mammogram/ultrasound. Re-excision rate after lumpectomy was 6.8% (5/73). MRI added value in 48 (28.9%) and was harmful in 48 (28.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Using breast MRI in the diagnostic workup of ILC has both positive and negative implications on surgical treatment planning. A shared decision-making conversation is warranted before proceeding with MRI to maximize value and minimize harms associated with this diagnostic tool.

Evaluation of breast surgical oncology complications after single agent versus dual agent HER2 targeted neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether differing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens for HER2 positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) are associated with differing surgical complications. Our goal was to evaluate postoperative complications in HER2+ BC patients receiving NAC with Herceptin (trastuzumab, H) alone versus in combination with pertuzumab (HP). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed of patients with Stage I-III HER2+ BC receiving NAC from 2007 to 2016. Demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure, and 60-day postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: H (n = 101) and HP (n = 132) were similar with respect to tumor characteristics and surgical procedure. Overall operative complications were similar between groups (p = 0.63), as were major versus minor complications (p = 1.0). Subgroup analysis identified a higher rate of complications for lumpectomy patients receiving HP versus H (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with HP is associated with increased complications after lumpectomy. Additional studies are warranted to assess causative factors for this observation.

Reducing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) Through Prospective Surveillance Monitoring Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) and Patient Directed Self-Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic progressive disease that results from breast cancer treatment and nodal surgery. NCCN guidelines support baseline measurements with prospective assessment for early diagnosis and treatment. We sought to determine if baseline measurement with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and serial postoperative evaluations provide early detection amenable to conservative interventions that reduce BCRL. METHODS: Breast cancer patients with unilateral disease high-risk for BCRL from a single institution were evaluated from November 2014 to December 2017. High risk was defined as axillary lymph node dissection with radiation and/or taxane chemotherapy. Patients received preoperative baseline BIS measurements followed by postoperative measurements with at least two follow-ups. Patients with BIS results that were 2 standard deviations above baseline (10 + points) started home conservative interventions for 4-6 weeks. Postintervention measurements were taken to assess improvement. RESULT: A total of 146 patients high-risk for BCRL were included. Forty-nine patients (34%) developed early BCRL and started self-directed treatment. Forty patients (82%) had elevated BIS measurements return to normal baseline range. Nine (6%) patients had persistent BCRL requiring referral for advanced therapy. Patients with persistent BCRL had significant nodal burden on surgical pathology; eight (89%) had N2/N3 disease. Six (76%) with BCRL refractory to conservative measures died of their breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that early conservative intervention for breast cancer patients high risk for BCRL who were prospectively monitored by utilizing BIS significantly lowers rates of BCRL. These findings support early prospective screening and intervention for BCRL. Early detection with patient-directed interventions improves patient outcomes and decreases the risk of persistent BCRL.