Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 130, 2024 Sep 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39311960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly popular in the post-operative management of abdominal surgery. Published data suggest that patients on ERAS protocols have fewer minor and major complications, and highlight a reduction in medical morbidity (such as urinary and respiratory infections). Limited data is available on surgical complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on post-operative complications and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the impact of this protocol on cost-effectiveness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2022, 532 colectomies for colorectal cancer (CRC) were performed. A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital on the cohort of patients, aged 18 years and older, operated on for non-urgent colorectal cancer. The impact on post-operative complications, hospital stay and economic impact was analysed in two groups: patients managed under ERAS and non-ERAS protocol. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching 1:1, each cohort included 71 patients, and clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced in terms of tumour type, surgical technique and surgical approach. ERAS patients experienced fewer infectious complications and a shorter postoperative stay (p < 0.001). In particular, they had an 8.5% reduction in anastomotic dehiscence (p = 0.012) and surgical wound infections (p = 0.029). After analysis of medical complications, no statistically significant differences were identified in urinary tract infections, pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding or sepsis. ERAS protocol was more efficient and cost-effective than the control group, with an overall savings of 37,673.44€. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital was cost-effective and associated with a reduction in post-operative complications, especially infectious complications.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Colectomía/economía , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA