Treatment overview of axial spondyloarthritis in 2023.

The treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is characterized by non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. It may depend on the type and extent of musculoskeletal and extramusculoskeletal manifestations. Recent data on non-pharmacological treatment options, such as physical activity, physiotherapy, and modification of lifestyle factors, are summarized in this review. Moreover, we have provided an overview on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the ever-expanding number of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, respectively). In addition to data on efficacy and safety, the review also encompasses data on switching/cycling, tapering, and treatment selection for specific patient subgroups to optimize treatment outcomes.

[How many patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have the technical prerequisites for video consultations and are also willing to use this to carry out visits by medical specialist visits?] / Wie viele Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen haben die technischen Voraussetzungen für Videosprechstunden und sind bereit, fachärztliche Visiten so durchzuführen?

BACKGROUND: The currently disseminating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and limited capacities in outpatient rheumatological care, pose questions about possible alternatives to clinical visits, also in view of the digital revolution. It is unclear whether and to what extent patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are willing and in a position to deal with the new media, such as video consultation. METHODS: In the middle of the pandemic in May 2020 outpatients were surveyed using a standardized questionnaire in order to document their possibilities and willingness to participate in a video consultation. The treating physicians were asked whether carrying out a video consultation was considered to be a possible and meaningful option. RESULTS: Overall, 232 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were surveyed (64.7% female, average age 54.0 ± 15.2 years), seropositive (n = 58) and seronegative (n = 51) rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA, n = 77) including axial SpA (axSpA) and psoriatic arthropathy (PsA) as well as collagenosis and vasculitis (CoV, n = 46). The mean duration of disease was 5.5 ± 8.2 years, whereby in 75 patients (32.3%) it was the first diagnosis. The mean disease activity (0-10, subjective patient self-estimation) was 4.7 ± 2.5. Overall, 176 patients were basically aware of the possibility to carry out video consultations (75.9%) and 166 considered that they were technically capable to participate (71.6%) but only 131 were principally willing to participate (56.5%). Logistic regression analyses showed that the willingness to participate in video consultations decreased with increasing age (ß = 0.28, p = 0.01). According to the medical estimation video consultations were thought to be principally possible for 161 patients for technical reasons (69.4%) and for 127 for medical reasons (54.7%); however, a video consultation within the framework of treatment was only considered to be meaningful by the physician for 76 patients (32.8%). CONCLUSION: Not all patients can or want to participate in video consultations and the willingness declines with increasing age. The estimation of the meaningfulness of video consultations by physicians was also limited to approximately one third of the patients surveyed. This must be taken into consideration for the future planning of video consultations.

Striking sex differences in magnetic resonance imaging findings in the sacroiliac joints in the population.

BACKGROUND: In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to detect bone marrow edema (BME) in sacroiliac joints (SIJ) but SIJ BME are also detected in the population. Not much is known about sex differences in that regard. OBJECTIVE: To explore sex-specific differences associated with the extent of BME in the SIJ suggestive of axSpA in a general population cohort study. METHODS: Taking advantage of 793 recently evaluated MRIs of subjects < 45 years taking part in the SHIP cohort, we used negative-binomial (NB) count data regression to analyze factors associated with the extent of SIJ BME. Predictors were explored by model-based boosting (MBB), a machine learning approach. RESULTS: Estimates of NB regression showed strong effects of sex in interaction with age, BMI, back pain, and particularly HLA-B27. The NB regression model showed incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the main effect of sex (females vs. males): 0.94 [95% CI: 0.63; 1.41], HLA-B27: 4.32 [2.09; 9.8], and for the interaction of sex to HLA-B27: 0.22 [0.06; 0.75]. According to MBB, HLA-B27 positivity, BMI, current smoking, back pain in the last 3 months, the interaction of sex and HLA-B27, and delivery in the last 12 months were of highest importance to explain the extent of SIJ BME. CONCLUSIONS: Different factors were associated with the extent of SIJ BME in females and males. Most importantly, HLA-B27 was relevant only in males but not in females in whom a postpartal state was important. This finding may be relevant for the pathogenesis of axSpA.

Which Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints Are Most Relevant for Diagnosing Axial Spondyloarthritis? A Prospective Study Comparing Rheumatologists' Evaluations With Radiologists' Findings.

OBJECTIVE: Pathologic sacroiliac (SI) joint changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important for the classification of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). In daily practice, radiologists play a major role in interpreting imaging findings. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of MRI SI joint findings on the identification of axial SpA by radiologists, in comparison to diagnosis by rheumatologists. METHODS: Patients age ≤45 years were prospectively included when referred for clinical suspicion of axial SpA and underwent a complete diagnostic evaluation including STIR- and T1-weighted MRI of the SI joint. Diagnosis made by an experienced rheumatologist with access to all relevant information was considered the gold standard. MRIs were evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists who were unaware of the clinical data, who indicated which MRI lesions were "critical" to the decision for or against axial SpA. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients included, 132 (44%) were diagnosed as having axial SpA. Mean age was comparable between the 2 groups, but patients with axial SpA and those with non-axial SpA differed with regard to symptom duration (58.6 ± 69.5 versus 33.9 ± 45.1 months, respectively; P = 0.003) and HLA-B27 positivity (75.6% versus 19%, respectively; P < 0.001). Rheumatologists and radiologists agreed on the diagnosis in 262 cases (87.3%), while 34 patients (11.3%) were diagnosed as having axial SpA by rheumatologists only (clinically), and 4 cases (1.3%) were judged as suggestive of axial SpA by radiologists only. Bone marrow edema (BME) and sclerosis showed the highest sensitivity, while erosions and fatty lesions showed the highest specificity, for axial SpA diagnosis. The combination of BME with erosions had the highest positive predictive value (86.5%). CONCLUSION: The MRI findings with the highest diagnostic value in patients in whom axial SpA is suspected are structural changes in the SI joint, alone or in combination with BME. Our findings indicate that while the absence of BME is usually not compatible with a diagnosis of axial SpA, the presence of BME does not necessarily confirm a diagnosis of axial SpA.

[RABBIT-SpA: a new disease register for axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis]. / RABBIT-SpA: ein neues Krankheitsregister für axiale Spondyloarthritis und Psoriasisarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has changed enormously in recent years due to market authorization of a number of new biologicals with different modes of action and the increasing use of biosimilars. Real-world data on long-term safety and efficacy under routine daily conditions is not yet sufficient. Therefore, the German Rheumatism Research Center has initiated a new cohort study covering axSpA and PsA. OBJECTIVE: Presentation of initial results from the new register RABBIT-SpA, which was started in May 2017. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study with a similar study design to the German biologics register RABBIT. Patients can be included at the start of a new treatment either in the so-called index drug group or in the comparison group (conventional systemic treatment, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAID). Follow-up per patient should be at least 5 years and preferably 10 years. The RABBIT-SpA uses a web-based documentation system. RESULTS: Up to mid-December 2018 a total of 514 axSpA patients had been documented in RABBIT-SpA, 410 with an index drug and 104 with conventional treatment. There are differences between these treatment groups, e. g. in the duration of the disease and in parameters of disease activity. It is also noticeable that in axSpA patients, approximately 5 years lie between the onset of the symptoms and confirmation of the diagnosis. Of the 355 PsA patients, 265 were included with an index drug and 90 with conventional treatment. Of the PsA patients 86% have a dominant peripheral manifestation. The average number of pressure tender joints is 8 and the average number of swollen joints is 4. CONCLUSION: The online register RABBIT-SpA is well-received by the participating rheumatological institutions. The electronic recording of patient data can be carried out in a reasonable time. Participation in the RABBIT-SpA is open to new rheumatological institutions at any time.

[Imaging of psoriatic arthritis and aspects of radiographic progression]. / Bildgebung bei der Psoriasisarthritis und Aspekte der röntgenologischen Progression.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous multifactorial disease with musculoskeletal involvement, which can be manifested as monoarthritis, oligoarthritis or polyarthritis and in some patients can also affect the axial skeleton. The most frequent indications of inflammation are bone marrow edema and enthesitis. The early and differential diagnosis of PsA is a clinical challenge, particularly as a differential diagnosis from other inflammatory or degenerative diseases of joints. Inflammatory joint and tendon alterations in the region of the extremities and the spine can be visualized with high sensitivity by the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), musculoskeletal sonography (US) and fluorescence optical imaging (FOI). The use of MRI has a prognostic value with respect to the further radiographic course of the disease, particularly in the initial stages of the disease. Structural damage can be specifically and also partially demonstrated 3­dimensionally in peripheral joints and the spine by the use of computed tomography (CT) and conventional X­ray imaging. High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) in particular, can visualize pathophysiological processes and the morphological consequences even in early stages of the disease. The values of conventional X­ray diagnostics, CT, MRI, musculoskeletal US and alternative imaging procedures are presented with respect to the diagnostics and prognosis of the progression of patients with PsA.

Long-term safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: integrated pooled clinical trial and post-marketing surveillance data.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G1-kappa monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A, has been shown to have robust efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) demonstrating a rapid onset of action and sustained long-term clinical responses with a consistently favorable safety profile in multiple Phase 2 and 3 trials. Here, we report longer-term pooled safety and tolerability data for secukinumab across three indications (up to 5 years of treatment in PsO and PsA; up to 4 years in AS). METHODS: The integrated clinical trial safety dataset included data pooled from 21 randomized controlled clinical trials of secukinumab 300 or 150 or 75 mg in PsO (14 Phase 3 trials and 1 Phase 4 trial), PsA (3 Phase 3 trials), and AS (3 Phase 3 trials), along with post-marketing safety surveillance data with a cut-off date of June 25, 2017. Adverse events (AEs) were reported as exposure-adjusted incident rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years. Analyses included all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of secukinumab. RESULTS: A total of 5181, 1380, and 794 patients from PsO, PsA, and AS clinical trials representing secukinumab exposures of 10,416.9, 3866.9, and 1943.1 patient-years, respectively, and post-marketing data from patients with a cumulative exposure to secukinumab of ~ 96,054 patient-years were included in the analysis. The most frequent AE was upper respiratory tract infection. EAIRs across PsO, PsA, and AS indications were generally low for serious infections (1.4, 1.9, and 1.2, respectively), Candida infections (2.2, 1.5, and 0.7, respectively), inflammatory bowel disease (0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively), and major adverse cardiac events (0.3, 0.4, and 0.6, respectively). No cases of tuberculosis reactivation were reported. The incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was low with secukinumab across all studies, with no discernible loss of efficacy, unexpected alterations in pharmacokinetics, or association with immunogenicity-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile over long-term treatment in patients with PsO, PsA, and AS. This comprehensive assessment demonstrated that the safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with previous reports in patients with PsO, PsA, and AS, supporting its long-term use in these chronic conditions.

[Differential diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis-axSpA mimics]. / Differenzialdiagnose axiale Spondyloarthritis ­ "axSpA mimics".

The classification of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises the classical ankylosing spondylitis (AS), which is characterized by already existing structural changes in the sacroiliac joints, and the so-called non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA), in which by definition such changes are not present. This distinction is based on the ASAS classification criteria for axSpA, which are however not suitable for a diagnosis. According to the current classification, spondyloarthritis (SpA) includes axSpA, which can be associated with psoriasis and/or chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (CED), such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and peripheral SpA, which is further divided into SpA associated with psoriasis, partially synonymous with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), reactive SpA, partially synonymous with reactive arthritis (ReA) and SpA associated with CED, partially synonymous with arthritis associated with CED (e.g. Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) and peripheral undifferentiated SpA, which by definition is not associated with any of the above. In this article only the most important differential diagnoses are discussed, i. e. diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), fractures and infections in the axial skeleton. In addition, the frequency of certain musculoskeletal findings in the normal population examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also discussed.

[Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostics in axial spondyloarthritis]. / Magnetresonanztomographie-Diagnostik bei axialer Spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a frequent disorder, which is difficult to diagnose in the early phase. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints and the spine is frequently applied in this phase, when conventional X rays still provide inconclusive results. OBJECTIVE: To explain the typical pathological results and the role of MRI in diagnosing axSpA. RESULTS: The use of MRI of the sacroiliac joints plays a central role in the assessment of the Spondyloarthritis International Association Society (ASAS) classification criteria of axSpA. Bone marrow edema is central to the definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joints. In addition, chronic changes in the sacroiliac joints, such as fat depositions and erosion are taken into account in making the diagnosis of axSpA. When the results are not clear, an additional MRI of the area of the spine in which the patient reports the most pronounced complaints can be performed. A bone marrow edema in at least three vertebral edges can be associated with axSpA. CONCLUSION: The MRI investigation of the sacroiliac joints has evolved into one of the most important methods in diagnosing axSpA.

Long-term efficiency of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: real life data confirm the potential for dose reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the treatment outcome of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the European AS infliximab cohort (EASIC) study after a total period of 8 years with specific focus on dosage and the duration of intervals between infliximab infusions. METHODS: EASIC included patients with AS who had received infliximab for 2 years as part of the ASSERT trial. After that period, rheumatologists were free to change the dose or the intervals of infliximab. Clinical data were status at baseline, end of ASSERT and for a total of 8 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Of the initially 71 patients with AS from EASIC, 55 patients (77.5%) had completed the 8th year of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. Of those, 48 patients (87.3%) still continued on infliximab. The mean infusion interval increased slightly from 6 to 7.1±1.5 weeks, while 45.8% patients had increased the intervals up to a maximum of 12 weeks. The mean infliximab dose remained stable over time, with a minimum of 3.1 mg/kg and a maximum of 6.4 mg/kg. In patients receiving <5 mg/kg infliximab, the mean infusion interval increased to 7.0±1.2 weeks. In total, the mean cumulative dose per patient and per year decreased from 3566.30 to 2973.60 mg. CONCLUSIONS: We could observe that over a follow-up of 8 years of treatment with infliximab, >85% patients still remained on the same treatment, without any major safety events. Furthermore, both the infusion intervals and also the mean infliximab dose were modestly reduced in ≥70% of the patients without the loss of clinical efficiency.

Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: what are the similarities and differences?

The development of the axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (ASAS) classification criteria has had several implications for our understanding of the entire spectrum of spondyloarthritides (SpA). Going beyond the modified New York criteria, which concentrate on conventional radiographs of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) for the classification of ankylosing spondylitis, the ASAS criteria add active inflammation of the SIJ as obtained by MRI and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) B27 to classify patients with chronic back pain starting at a young age as axial SpA (axSpA). AxSpA should be considered as one disease that includes AS, the radiographic form, as well as the non-radiographic (nr-axSpA) form. Similarities and differences between these subgroups have been described in 3 studies: 1 local study, 1 national study (German SpA Inception Cohort) and 1 international study mainly conducted to test the efficacy of a tumour necrosis factor α blocker. Most clinical features and assessments of axSpA showed the same prevalence in patients with and without radiographic changes. However, some differences have been observed: the male:female ratio, the proportion of patients with objective signs of inflammation such as bone marrow oedema as detected by MRI, and the proportion of patients with increased levels of C reactive protein were higher in patients with AS. Importantly, these factors have also been identified as prognostic factors for more severe disease in terms of new bone formation. Thus, nr-axSpA may represent an early stage of AS but may also just be an abortive form of a disease which does cause much pain but which may also never lead to structural changes of the axial skeleton. Since the cut-off between nr-axSpA and AS is artificial and unreliable, we think that the term nr-axSpA should not be used for diagnosis but only for classification for historical reasons.

Optimisation of rheumatology assessments - the actual situation in axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis.

The spondyloarthritides (SpA) are currently differentiated into axial and peripheral SpA. Patients with axial SpA (axSpA) may be further classified into the classical form ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). The SpA are genetically linked, and the subtypes including psoriatic arthritis (PsA) share characteristic clinical symptoms such as inflammatory back pain (IBP) and enthesitis. IMP can be due to sacroiliitis and spondylitis, enthesitis may occur with or without arthritis, and anterior uveitis, as well as other extraarticular manifestations such as psoriasis and chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition to clinical findings, imaging, mainly conventional radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and laboratory results such as HLA B27 and CRP are important tools for classification and diagnosis of SpA. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS), an international group of experts in the field of SpA since 1995, has published on assessments and outcome parameters in SpA. The publication of classification criteria for axSpA has now largely replaced the 1984 criteria for AS. However, the established cut-off between AS and nr-axSpA, 'definite' structural changes in the sacroiliac joints, has been recently debated because of limited reliability. Since imaging plays an important role in all criteria sets, the ASAS group has recently published definitions for inflammatory changes in the SIJ and the spine. The most important domains in AS are disease activity, function, spinal mobility, structural damage, and quality of life, some of which are discussed in this manuscript. For axSpA there are two major tools to assess disease activity, the BASDAI and the ASDAS, one for function, the BASFI, and several mobility measures including the BASMI. The AS Health Index (AS-HI) is introduced elsewhere in this supplement.

[SAPHO syndrome]. / SAPHO-Syndrom.

The SAPHO syndrome, an acronym for synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis, is a rare disease which affects bones, joints and the skin. The main osteoarticular features are hyperostosis and osteitis. Osteoarticular symptoms predominantly occur on the anterior chest wall but the spine and the peripheral skeleton can also be involved. The most important skin affections are palmoplantar pustulosis and severe acne. The etiology of this syndrome remains unclear but infectious, immunological and genetic factors are involved. The diagnostic features of SAPHO syndrome are clinical and radiological. The most important diagnostic procedure is Tc-99 m bone scintigraphy but conventional x-rays as well as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also contribute to the final diagnosis. Bone histology and positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) may help to differentiate SAPHO syndrome from malignancies and infectious osteomyelitis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the cornerstone of treatment. The results obtained using antibiotics and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as sulfasalazine and methotrexate are inconsistent. Bisphosphonates and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs have shown promising results in small studies but further research is still necessary.

Which spinal lesions are associated with new bone formation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with anti-TNF agents? A long-term observational study using MRI and conventional radiography.

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship of spinal inflammation and fatty degeneration (FD) as detected by MRI and new bone formation seen on conventional radiographs (CRs) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: CRs at baseline, 2 years and 5 years and spinal MRIs at baseline and 2 years of 73 AS patients treated with infliximab in European AS Infliximab Cohort were available. Relative risks (RR) were calculated with a general linear model after adjustment for within-patient variation. RESULTS: In a total of 1466 vertebral edges (VEs) without baseline syndesmophytes, 61 syndesmophytes developed at 5 years, the majority of which (57.4%) had no corresponding detectable MRI lesions at baseline. VEs with both inflammation and FD at baseline had the highest risk (RR 3.3, p=0.009) for syndesmophyte formation at 5 years, followed by VEs that developed new FD or did not resolve FD at 2 years (RR=2.3, p=0.034), while inflammation at baseline with no FD at 2 years had the lowest risk for syndesmophyte formation at 5 years (RR=0.8). Of the VEs with inflammation at baseline, >70% resolved completely, 28.8% turned into FD after 2 years, but only 1 syndesmophyte developed within 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Parallel occurrence of inflammation and FD at baseline and development of FD without prior inflammation after 2 years were significantly associated with syndesmophyte formation after 5 years of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. However, the sequence 'inflammation-FD-new bone formation' was rarely observed, an argument against the TNF-brake hypothesis. Whether an early suppression of inflammation leads to a decrease of the risk for new bone formation remains to be demonstrated.

[What is ascertained in the therapy of axial spondyloarthritis?]. / Was ist gesichert in der Therapie der axialen Spondyloarthritis?

The new term axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) includes classic ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic (nr-) axSpA. The definition was introduced in 2009 as part of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA, where-apart from chronic back pain starting before the age of 45 years and the presence of HLA-B27-magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated bone marrow edema of the sacroiliac joints (osteomyelitis) or structural changes on x-rays may play an important role. These criteria can also be used for diagnosis. A major advantage of the new criteria is the identification of patients in early disease stages. In addition to physical therapy, drug treatment with steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), corticosteroid injections, and biologics [blocker of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)] have all been shown to be effective, while conventional disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) such as sulfasalazine and methotrexate seem to work mainly for peripheral arthritis but not for enthesitis. Biologics are indicated when NSAIDs in optimal dosage have failed. Both these drugs have the potential to improve pain, stiffness, and function but they may also have an influence on new bone formation (syndesmophytes). NSAIDs need to be given continuously and biologics for longer periods of time. Patients with elevated C-reactive protein levels benefit most when treated consequently.

[Differential diagnosis of back pain in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: instable cervical spine fracture]. / Differenzialdiagnose Rückenschmerz bei Patienten mit Spondylitis ankylosans: instabile Halswirbelsäulenfraktur.

HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 65-year-old patient with longstanding ankylosing spondylitis (AS) complained of persistent pain in the right shoulder and the neck; elevation of the shoulder was impaired. The symptoms had started a week before admission after a fall. Physical examination revealed generally decreased mobility of an already hyperkyphotic cervical spine (CS) and decreased thoracic excursion. The paravertebral muscles were stiff . CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS: Because of the trauma extensive imaging procedures with conventional radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) of the CS were performed. These showed a compression fracture of C5, detachment of the dorsal and ventral ligaments and a ventral dislocation of C4 with dislocation (Type C fracture). TREATMENT AND COURSE: After immediate consultation of the cooperating center for spinal surgery corpectomy of C5 and ventral fusion of C3-7 were performed on the same day, together with a dorsal transpedicular fusion. During the imaging procedures symptoms of a beginning paraplegia occurred. After successful surgery and early postoperative rehabilitation, the patient was discharged to an in-patient rehabiltation unit. At discharge, there was but a slight paresis of the right arm. CONCLUSION: Patients with AS and advanced spinal ankylosis are at increased risk of vertebral fracture after minor accidents. Regardless of the initial report of clinical symptoms it is mandatory to perform appropriate imaging procedures usually including MRI.

[Spondyloarthritis - the novel concept. An introduction to the diagnosis and treatment of axial spondyloarthritis]. / Spondyloarthritiden - das neue Konzept. Eine Einführung zu Diagnostik und Therapie der axialen Spondyloarthritis.

The characteristic features of spondyloarthritis are inflammation in the axial skeleton (sacroiliitis, spondylitis) and inflammation in peripheral joints (arthritis) and entheses (enthesitis). According to the leading clinical symptom SpA is today differentiated in the either predominant axial or the peripheral form. The axial SpA are further subdivided in ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial SpA. This subset is characterized by the absence of structural changes on conventional x-rays. In this review we describe the clinical symptoms, the diagnosis and therapy of patients with axial SpA.

The degree of spinal inflammation is similar in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who report high or low levels of disease activity: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The threshold for disease activity required to start antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy has been arbitrarily set in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) at Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥ 4. How this relates to spinal inflammation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the clinical, laboratory and imaging data of patients with axSpA with respect to their BASDAI level. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients with axSpA who had never been treated with TNF blockers were included. Laboratory parameters, spinal MRI and x-rays were quantified. Data were stratified according to BASDAI ≥ 4. RESULTS: 44 patients were diagnosed as non-radiographic axSpA (nraxSpA) and 56 patients as ankylosing spondylitis (AS): median age 40.3 ± 10.4 years; 57% male, mean disease duration since diagnosis 6.4 ± 8.4 years, 88% HLA-B27+, mean modified Stokes Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score 8.3 ± 16.4. 60% of patients had spinal inflammation by MRI. The stratification based on BASDAI ≥ 4 disclosed significant differences in most clinical parameters but not for inflammation: patients with nraxSpA and BASDAI < 4 versus ≥ 4 had 0.9 ± 1.4 and 0.5 ± 0.6 inflammatory lesions/patient, respectively (p=0.6), while patients with AS had 3.6 ± 3.7 and 2.7 ± 3.0 inflammatory lesions/patient, respectively (p=0.4). CONCLUSION: The burden of inflammation is quite comparable in patients with axSpA-regardless of disease activity. These data clearly challenge the concept of the recommended cut-off point of BASDAI ≥ 4.

Glucocorticoid treatment in spondyloarthritis.

Spondyloarthritides (SpA) are chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases that usually affect the axial skeleton and may involve entheses and peripheral joints. The main subtypes are ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Other subtypes are reactive arthritis, arthritis associated with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases and undifferentiated axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis. Although SpA were regarded as variants of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) until the 1970s, it is now well established that the pathogenesis of SpA is quite different from that of RA. There is a lack of good clinical studies on glucocorticoid therapy in the SpA. While there is no reasonable doubt that intraarticular local therapies in SpA are as effective as in RA and other forms of arthritis, the evidence for a systemic use is at best marginal. While very high doses may be effective in some patients with AS, the possible value of low-dose corticosteroid therapy in patients with PsA has never been well addressed, with respect to either clinical efficacy or inhibition of radiographic progression. Future studies are needed to clarify this important issue for usual patient care.