Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
2.
Ann Oncol ; 33(2): 158-168, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34718117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected >210 million people worldwide. An optimal therapeutic approach for COVID-19 remains uncertain, to date. Since the history of cancer was linked to higher mortality rates due to COVID-19, the establishment of a safe and effective vaccine coverage is crucial in these patients. However, patients with cancer (PsC) were mostly excluded from vaccine candidates' clinical trials. This systematic review aims to investigate the current available evidence about the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in PsC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All prospective studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were included, with immunogenicity after the first and the second dose as the primary endpoint, when available. RESULTS: Vaccination against COVID-19 for PsC seems overall safe and immunogenic after well-conducted vaccination schedules. Yet the seroconversion rate remains lower, lagged or both compared to the general population. Patients with hematologic malignancies, especially those receiving B-cell-depleting agents in the past 12 months, are the most at risk of poor seroconversion. CONCLUSION: A tailored approach to vaccination may be proposed to PsC, especially on the basis of the type of malignancy and of the specific oncologic treatments received.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroconversión , Vacunación
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(4): 1639-1647, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31278463

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Anemia is common in oncology and negatively impacts quality of life. However, there is lack of knowledge about iron deficiency (ID) epidemiology. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess iron status in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer beginning chemotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, anemia and ID were evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors and lymphoma before starting chemotherapy. Blood samples were collected at inclusion (W0), 6 weeks (W6), and 12 weeks (W12). Prevalence was evaluated in the general population, according to tumor location and was correlated with tumor response. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2015; 119 had solid tumors and 10 lymphomas. At W0, there were no significant difference between locations with a prevalence around 50-60% (range 47.2-70.4%) and only a trend for colorectal cancer (70.4%, P = 0.069) due to a higher prevalence of absolute ID (18.5%). Prevalence of ID+ decreased between W0 and W6 and remained stable until W12 due to the proportion of patients with ID and without anemia. However, anemia prevalence increased during W0 and W6 and remained stable to W6 from W12 due to patients with anemia but without ID. A significant correlation between tumor response and ID prevalence was found (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the high prevalence of ID and anemia in cancer patients. ID status is correlated to tumor response providing a strong rationale for iron monitoring during cancer management.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/epidemiología , Deficiencias de Hierro , Trastornos del Metabolismo del Hierro/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Anemia Ferropénica/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos del Metabolismo del Hierro/sangre , Trastornos del Metabolismo del Hierro/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
7.
Respir Med Res ; 76: 38-44, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31527016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who survive more than 2 years are considered long-term survivors (LTSs). The present study examined factors associated with long-term survival and collected information for future comparison. METHODS: Clinical, molecular, and therapeutic data were collected from patients followed for primary stage IV (7th TNM classification) NSCLC within 2 years from diagnosis in the respiratory medicine departments of 53 French non-teaching hospitals. LTS and non-LTS records were compared. Factors associated with long-term survival were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Vital status at least 2 years after diagnosis was known for 1977 stage IV NSCLC patients; 220 (11.1%) were LTSs. On multivariate analysis, independent positive factors comprised: TTF-1(+) immunochemistry, EGFR-mutation, surgery, rescue radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Independent negative factors comprised: prediagnosis weight loss>5kg, ECOG performance status>1, and primary radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular biology and targeted therapy were decisive for long-term survival. With their development and their widespread implementation in clinical practice, the percentage of LTSs is expected to grow. Factors determining long-term survival found in this study should be taken into account when considering treatment options for patients with stage IV NSCLC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
8.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 125: 48-50, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29650276

RESUMEN

Pulmonary blastomas represent about 0.5% of primary pulmonary malignancies. The prognosis is poor. Standard treatment consists of surgical excision. There are no published series on which to judge the efficacy of chemotherapy or radiation therapy. We describe an unusual case of classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma (CBPC), with long-term survival despite numerous and varied cancer-related events and review the literature. Our 71-year-old Caucasian woman presented with history of blood in sputum in 2009. Right lower lobectomy yielded a diagnosis of sarcomatoid carcinoma (pneumoblastoma). Unusually, our patient is still alive 7 years after initial surgery, despite metastatic first relapse after 2 years. Metastatic progression was confirmed histologically on three separate occasions during the disease course. The patient received a combination of cisplatin (or carboplatin) and etoposide on three separate occasions. Molecular biology studies of CBPC are needed to identify effective treatments, and a patient registry should be created.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Blastoma Pulmonar , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Pronóstico , Blastoma Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Blastoma Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Blastoma Pulmonar/patología , Blastoma Pulmonar/cirugía , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Oncology ; 86(3): 143-51, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24577186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer have a prognosis and outcome that may be dependent on a host of factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 401 female breast cancer patients who developed metastatic disease after the age of 70 years in order to define potential prognostic factors for specific survival at the time of first recurrence. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 60 months from the time of recurrence, the median specific survival was 21.0 months (95% CI 17.0-23.0). In multivariate analysis we demonstrated that negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.002), presence of positive lymph nodes at initial cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.07-1.75; p = 0.01), site of metastasis (p < 10(-4)) and metastasis-free interval (HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p = 0.008) constituted unfavorable independent prognostic factors able to predict specific survival from the time of metastatic occurrence. Age at initial diagnosis, Scarff-Bloom Richardson grade and adjuvant treatments were significant only in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These survival prognostic factors associated with the use of a specific geriatric questionnaire to assess frailty may assist physicians in evaluating the patient's survival potential and choose a tailored treatment to this cancer population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Mastectomía , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/secundario , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 4(4): 394-401, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24472485

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our main aim was to describe and explore a multidisciplinary approach to the management of elderly patients with cancer, who constitute a heterogeneous population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive study was performed between October 2009 and September 2010. Patients with cancer ≥ 70 years of age were included. Some underwent a simplified multidimensional geriatric assessment with a Charlson score administered by an oncologist, and the evaluation was submitted to a geriatrician who decided whether or not a complete a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) (n=54) should be done. Another group of patients directly underwent a CGA (n=49), and a few patients included in a specific trial underwent a geriatric assessment (n=8). Each patient was classified as fit, vulnerable, or frail by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: 111 patients were included (median age: 81 years [range: 65-96]; 60 males). The most frequent types of cancer were lung (n=29), gastrointestinal (n=20) and head and neck (n=14). Median Charlson score was 2.1 [range: 0-9]. Standard therapy was given to 37/41 (90%) fit, 19/41 (42%) vulnerable, and 6/29 (21%) frail patients. Thirteen frail patients received best supportive care. A social worker was mobilized for 2/41 (5%) fit, 14/41 (34%) vulnerable, and 11/29 (38%) frail patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study outlines the possibilities of cooperation between geriatricians and oncologists in a general hospital. This collaboration could modify therapeutic schedules especially in frail and vulnerable patients.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Modelos Teóricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Francia , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Oncology ; 81(2): 73-8, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21968516

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite current treatment options, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains essentially incurable, requiring research on new drugs or combinations to improve survival and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose of all-oral tegafur-uracil (UFT)/folinic acid combined with vinorelbine as chemotherapy for MBC. Starting doses were 40 mg/m(2)/week of oral vinorelbine administered continuously and 250 mg/m(2)/day of UFT plus 90 mg/day of folinic acid from day 1 to day 28, followed by a 1-week rest period. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. Eight were evaluable for toxicity and antitumor response. The second dose level was shown to be the MTD. At this dose, 2 out of 5 patients receiving oral vinorelbine at 40 mg/m(2)/week and UFT at 300 mg/m(2)/day developed DLT consisting of grade 3 asthenia and grade 3 nausea despite standard prophylaxis. Other toxicities were grade 1 diarrhea and anemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for this combination seems to be the first dose level. A stable response was observed for 6 patients (average 33 weeks). This combination appears to be well-tolerated and offers an alternative to intravenous chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Uracilo/administración & dosificación , Uracilo/efectos adversos , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/efectos adversos , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , Vinorelbina
14.
Vaccine ; 28(43): 7030-4, 2010 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20817011

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to determine predictive factors influencing the acceptance of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza vaccination among hospital workers (HW) in two French cancer centers. A standardized, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was sent to HW of two cancer centers. The survey response rate was 26.2% (n=506). Main reasons for A(H1N1) vaccination acceptance were "to protect my relatives" (30.3%), "to protect myself" (30.3%). Main reasons for A(H1N1) vaccination refusal were the fear of side effects (43.1%), doubt about the vaccine's efficacy (25.8%). Vaccinated HW were more influenced by the institutional campaign (p<0.001) or colleagues' advice (p<0.001) whereas non-vaccinated HW were influenced by their family physician's advice (p=0.03), personal conviction (p<0.001) or the media (p<0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed age (>35 vs ≤ 35), prior seasonal influenza vaccination, professional category and source of information to be predictive factors of vaccination. Future vaccination campaigns will need to focus on young HW (≤ 35-year old), with no prior influenza vaccination and HW who are in contact with patients and who reported low seasonal influenza vaccination rates.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/psicología
15.
Bull Cancer ; 97(3): 311-20, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20123649

RESUMEN

Tamoxifen is a prodrug mainly metabolized by the CY2D6 cytochrome. More than 80 variants of the CYP2D6 gene have been identified. They predict four different enzymatic phenotypes: ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM), extensive metabolizers (EM), intermediate metabolizers (IM) and poor metabolizers (PM). Six retrospectives studies suggest a link between some polymorphisms of the CYP2D6 and tamoxifen efficacy and two studies have found no statistically significant data. Today, level of proof remains insufficient to recommend the testing of a patient's genotype before tamoxifen prescription. Designing prospective studies is necessary before considering therapy strategies based on pharmacogenetics data. In pre-menopausal breast cancer PM or IM patients, an increase in dosage of tamoxifen or a treatment with LH-RH analogues with aromatase inhibitors (AI) may be beneficial instead of the actual recommendations of a 5-year tamoxifen therapy. In postmenopausal EM patients, tamoxifen may be as efficient as AI. In post-menopausal PM patients, a switch strategy may be inferior to a 5-year IA strategy, which would therefore be the standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/farmacocinética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/metabolismo , Polimorfismo Genético , Tamoxifeno/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/metabolismo , Etnofarmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/genética , Farmacogenética , Profármacos/farmacocinética , Profármacos/uso terapéutico , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Tamoxifeno/análogos & derivados , Tamoxifeno/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico
16.
Bull Cancer ; 96(11): 1045-52, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19822486

RESUMEN

The new swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) strain (S-OIV) pandemia may expose immunodepressed cancer patients under chemotherapy to an increased risk of mortality. Here, we put into perspective available antiviral treatments and influenza vaccination efficacy in cancer patients and consider that recommendations for seasonal influenza vaccination for these patients are applicable for the upcoming S-OIV vaccines. We recommend a triple vaccination in cancer patients (seasonal influenza, S-OIV, streptococus pneumoniae), if possible at least two weeks before beginning chemotherapy. In case of an influenza-like illness under chemotherapy, the care will depend on the neutrophilic level. If neutrophil count is under 500 units/mm3, hospital admission is recommended with adapted isolation measures and the prescription of an antiviral treatment with oseltamivir 75 mg twice a day for 5 days, if the onset of symptoms occurred within 48 hours. In case of a sign of severity, antiviral treatment should be started regardless of time of the onset of symptoms. Probabilistic antibiotics should also be introduced. In the absence of neutropenia, home care should be favored, by explaining recommended hygienic measures and by starting an antiviral treatment with the same modalities as described previously. Hospital admission is indicated if a sign of severity is present. Patients under chemotherapy, if not vaccinated, who have had a contact with an infected person should receive a prophylactic antiviral treatment with oseltamivir 75 mg once a day for 10 days.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neutropenia/terapia , Oseltamivir/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Estreptocócicas/administración & dosificación
17.
Prog Urol ; 19(2): 85-93, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19168010

RESUMEN

Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for nonmetastatic, muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer. However, bladder-sparing approaches can be discussed in carefully selected patients. Bladder-preservation protocols aim to guaranty local control and survival with a functional bladder and a good quality of life. Such strategies include combinations of transurethral resection and radiochemotherapy, partial cystectomy and brachytherapy, radiotherapy-cystotomy and electrontherapy. Strict selection criteria and close follow-up are mandatory. New irradiation techniques hold the promise to improve local control by selectively boosting the dose to the tumor while better sparing the organs at risk. Such advances include the use of multimodal imaging, image-guided radiotherapy, concomitant boost with conformal irradiation+/-intensity modulated radiation therapy. Brachytherapy, either high-dose or pulsed-rate, is a promising technique for selected cases. Highly-conformal irradiation with tumor tracking using the Cyberknifetrade mark technology may also provide opportunities to boost the tumor while reducing toxicities. Specific innovative irradiation techniques are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/radioterapia , Humanos , Radioterapia/métodos , Radioterapia/tendencias
20.
Ann Oncol ; 19(12): 2012-9, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18641006

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains palliative. Patients with MBC represent a heterogeneous group whose prognosis and outcome may be dependent on host factors. The purpose of the present study was dual: first, to draw up a list of factors easily available in everyday clinical practice requiring no sophisticated or costly methods and second, to provide results from a large cohort of women who underwent diagnostic and treatment at a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1975 to 2005, a total of 1,038 women with MBC during their follow-up were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were subsequently assigned to five groups according to the period of metastatic diagnosis. RESULTS: It is shown that age at initial diagnosis, hormonal receptor status and site of metastasis are the most relevant prognostic factors for predicting survival from the time of metastastic occurrence. It is also shown that a metastasis-free interval is an easily and immediately available multifactorial prognostic index reflecting the multiparametric variability of the disease. CONCLUSION: These fundamental observations may assist physicians in evaluating the survival potential of patients and in directing them toward the appropriate therapeutic decision.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/patología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA