Comparing the physicochemical properties of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) and polymeric DCPD (P-DCPD) cement particles.

We developed a new and injectable poly-dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (P-DCPD) forming cement. The key structural difference between P-DCPD and classical DCPD is that P-DCPD is composed of interconnected P-DCPD crystals by interlocking to the polyphosphate chains. In contrast, DCPD is composed of a package of DCPD crystals with weak mutual ionic bonding. The purpose of this continuing study was to compare the physicochemical properties between P-DCPD and DCPD cement particles. Data collected from SEM, X-ray diffraction, and Raman Spectroscopy approaches demonstrated that P-DCPD has a more stable chemical structure than DCPD as evidenced by much less transformation to hydroxyapatite (HA) during setting. Nanoindentation showed a similar hardness while the elastic modulus of P-DCPD is much lower than DCPD that might be due to the much less HA transformation of P-DCPD. P-DCPD has much lower zeta potential and less hydrophilicity than DCPD because of its entangled and interconnected polyphosphate chains. It is expected that superhydrophilic DCPD undergoes faster dissolution than P-DCPD in an aqueous environment. Another interesting finding is that the pH of eluent from P-DCPD is more neutral (6.6-7.1) than DCPD (5.5-6.5). More extensive experiments are currently underway to further evaluate the potential impacts of the different physiochemical performance observed of P-DCPD and DCPD cement particles on the biocompatibility, degradation behavior and bone defect healing efficacy both in vivo and in vitro.

Comparing the release of erythromycin and vancomycin from calcium polyphosphate hydrogel using different drug loading methods.

Calcium polyphosphate (CPP) hydrogel is used to load erythromycin (EM) and vancomycin (VCM) by means of two loading methods: they are either added directly to the formed CPP hydrogel (Gel Mixture method) or mixed with CPP powders, followed by the formation of CPP-antibiotic hydrogel (Powder Mixture method). The release of loaded antibiotics from CPP hydrogel is measured up to 48 hr. Compared to Powder Mixture method, Gel Mixture method significantly reduced the burst release of embedded antibiotics. A significant change in CPP hydrogel Raman characteristic peaks is observed only in Gel Mixture method, indicating a close interaction between embedded antibiotics with CPP hydrogel matrix. In contrast, a similarity between characteristic peaks of CPP hydrogel and Powder Mixture method shows that antibiotic incorporation does not interfere with CPP gel formation, resulting in no ionic interaction between antibiotic and polyphosphate chains. Rheometer analysis further confirms that the hydrophobic nature of EM impacts the viscoelastic properties of CPP hydrogel, whereas the hydrophilic VCM exhibits a higher loading efficiency. The potential application of CPP hydrogel as a ceramic matrix for sustained drug release warrants further investigation.